similar to: OPUS examples questions

Dear all: I installed the rsync 2.5.4 in my two machine (192.168.1.30 and 192.168.1.120, both are AIX OS) to backup data each other. The software`s installation is ok, and I can copy local files. But when I try to backup data between two machines, there reports some errors: >./bin/rsync -avz 192.168.1.30::web ./backup-3000/ rsync: failed to connect to 192.168.1.30: Connection refused

I understand that we need to push the address to a register then branch using the register. But i am asking why there is a trampoline there such that a call to foo is first branched to an snippet and the snippet branches to the X86CompilationCallback. is this snippet necessary ? Thanks Xin On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Reid Kleckner <reid.kleckner at gmail.com>wrote: > The

How do I submit my GSOC proposal to the llvmdev mailing list ? -- Kind Regards Xin Tong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110328/4f068139/attachment.html>

The address of the callee may be more than 2 GB away in memory, which cannot be encoded as an immediate offset in the call instruction. So, the value is first materialized with a mov instruction which can encode the immediate and then jumped to through a register. Reid On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Xin Tong Utoronto <x.tong at utoronto.ca> wrote: > I have a question on the LLVM JIT

Hi, I would like to assign a value to a member b of the list a in position 3, by calling: assign( target, 2.34, 3) My question is what the "target" should be. I tried target <- paste("a", $, "b") and something else, but haven't got the right answer yet. BTW, if I attached a list named

I have a question on the LLVM JIT I did some brief memory reading one day and I found that a call to a non-library function is resolved by the X86CompilationCallback, but the X86CompilationCallback is reached through a trampoline. why can not the generated code jump to the X86CompilationCallback function directly ? 0x2b0a6a4d103b: mov $0x2b0a6a561010,%rax 0x2b0a6a4d1045:

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Wang, Chris <cwang at sonusnet.com> wrote: > I downloaded test vectors from opus-codec.org site. The site indicated > that the test files are intended for verifying that the Opus decoders are > operating properly. I assume I could also use them to verify my encoder > implementation, right? For example, use testvector01.dec as input to my

Benjamin, Thanks for the prompt response. Are there other recommended methods to verify encoder implementations? Regards, Chris From: benjamin.m.schwartz at gmail.com [mailto:benjamin.m.schwartz at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Benjamin Schwartz Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 1:53 PM To: Wang, Chris Cc: opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] Questions Regarding Opus Test Vectors On Sun, Nov 10,

On 24 June 2011 21:13, Xin Tong Utoronto <x.tong at utoronto.ca> wrote: > I would like to know the status of the autovectorization support in LLVM. >  does LLVM have a loop dependence analysis, does LLVM have a infrastructure > for autovectorization ? etc. Not yet, but it's getting there... http://polly.grosser.es/ cheers, --renato

On 29 March 2011 12:35, Xin Tong Utoronto <x.tong at utoronto.ca> wrote: > *Project Description:* > > * > * > > LLVM has gained much popularity in the programming languages and compiler > industry from the time it is developed. Lots of researchers have used LLVM > as frameworks for their researches and many languages have been ported to > LLVM IR and interpreted,

I would like to ask them Why do they always say that OPUS is a leader in 64k and 96k, but that it is not 128k or 192k? Does OPUS not achieve transparency in 128k and at 160k is it like a 320k MP3 file? Thanks for reading my question, this is referred to the new version of OPUS 1.2. Since I want to know your recommendation for a transparent file at a lower bitrate. -------------- next part

I would like to know the status of the autovectorization support in LLVM. does LLVM have a loop dependence analysis, does LLVM have a infrastructure for autovectorization ? etc. Kind Regards Xin Tong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110624/3dc35318/attachment.html>

Hi All, I just started to learn compiling C codes for R usage, and got a problem when I was playing with my 'hello world' code. #include <R.h> #include <Rdefines.h> #include <Rmath.h> SEXP test( ) { double x; x=dnorm(1.0,0.0,1.0,1); printf(" x value is: %d \n",x); return(R_NilValue); } I got the result : x value is: -466460838 Could

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:32:03PM +0800, Hurricane Tong wrote: > I seem to run into some trouble. > I succeeded in building the source code of Xapian in ubuntu, > but when I write a demo c++ application > > [snip] > I can't get it built. > > > hurricanetong at hurricanetong-VirtualBox:~/workspace$ g++ -L/usr/local/lib -lxapian-1.3 BuildIndexDemo.cpp Hmmm,

Hi, I am trying to output a R data set for use in WinBugs, I used dput(list(x=rnorm(100),N=100),file="bug.dat") But I can't get the intended format: list(x=c(.......),N=100), instead, I got something like this (copied the first two lines): [00000000]???73?74?72?75??63?74?75?72??65?28?6C?69??73?74?28?78???? structure(list(x

Hi Xin, Thank you for your reply! I have tried the 3 alias analyses you have mentioned on LLVM 3.5: 1) $ opt -globalsmodref-aa -aa-eval < xxx.bc > /dev/null (May-alias response 100%) 2) $ opt -tbaa -aa-eval < xxx.bc > /dev/null (May-alias response 100%) 3) $ opt -cfl-aa -aa-eval < xxx.bc> /dev/null (Unknown command line argument '-cfl-aa') It seems that they are not

Dear Sir, Very glad to send E-mali to you , Im Annie. I have encountered some problems on the way of learning opus, so I would like to consult you. I found "global_stack" was not released after malloc, and malloc memory was too large.So what I want to ask you is whether "global_stack" malloc can have less memory, since the value "GLOBAL_STACK_SIZE" can be

I don't think so, but you should check source code. On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech at gmail.com> wrote: > but does it have default values ? > > Thanks > > Xin > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Che-Liang Chiou <clchiou at gmail.com> wrote: >> You specify shader model, bit size and etc. arch-specified parameters >>

I downloaded test vectors from opus-codec.org site. The site indicated that the test files are intended for verifying that the Opus decoders are operating properly. I assume I could also use them to verify my encoder implementation, right? For example, use testvector01.dec as input to my encoder and compare its output bitstream with the corresponding testvector01.bit bitstream file. Any idea

Dear all: In fact, even I add the user in the command, the rsync`s error is still appearing: >./bin/rsync -avz tong@192.168.1.30:/BGI/UCSC-mirror/bin/rsync-2.5.4/man ./backup-3000/ rshd: 0826-813 Permission is denied. rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(151) another try: >./bin/rsync -avz