similar to: uEFI support for PXELinux 6.0 alpha?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "uEFI support for PXELinux 6.0 alpha?"

2014 Mar 27
1
Any hints about compiling syslinux 6.03-pre9 on AMD64?
Dear all, I packaged syslinux 6.03-pre9 on AMD64 Debian Sid, however, the problem is, I have problem to use it for PXE booting (BIOS mode). It always gives me "Failed to load COM32 file vesamenu.c32". I am sure all the settings are correct because if I switch to the prebuilt syslinux downloaded from
2013 May 07
1
Syslinux 5.01 fails to boot iPXE
I have an issue to boot iPXE with Syslinux 5.01. However, the same method works for Syslinux 4.06. The error messages I got is (see attached png file): =================================== iPXE 1.0.0+git-20120202.f8840ba-3 -- Open Source Network Boot Firmware -- http://ipxe.org Features: VLAN HTTP iSCSI DNS TFTP AoE SRP BzImage COMBOOT ELF MBOOT PXE PXEXT /syslinux/ipxe.lkn: command not found
2013 Sep 26
3
One DHCP/PXE config for BIOS, EFI32, and EFI64 clients?
On 09/26/2013 01:44 AM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: > Yes; you can configure your DHCP server to hand out different values for > the pxelinux.configfile option to specific clients, matching on MAC > address or a variety of other conditions. Of course, this means that > the config file for that machine will need to know what firmware to > expect and thus what path to set. Hi Jeffrey,
2013 Sep 12
2
Problem with pxelinux 5.10 and memtest86+ 4.20
Deal developers, I'd like to follow the thread http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/syslinux/2013-April/019761.html but change the subject to 'pxelinux 5.10 and memtest86+ 4.20' and provide more test cases. The pxelinux before version 5, e.g. version 4.06, worked very well with memtest86+ 4.20, all my PXE client machines, including VMWare workstation 9, VirtualBox 4.2, and all the real
2014 Mar 08
2
Syslinux EFI + TFTPBOOT Support
On 2014?03?08? 20:57, Gene Cumm wrote: > Please try 6.03-pre6. I see a regression on 6.03-pre7 with EFI64 netboot > >> > Another thing you I'd like to mentioned is, after bootx64.efi was >> > downloaded, the next download for ldlinux.e64 was about 15 secs later. >> > Is that normal? > When it's successful for me, it takes 0.2s from the beginning of >
2013 Oct 29
2
syslinux/isolinux 6.2 "Error: Couldn't read the first disk sector"
After switching to version 6.2, I am having a problem to use chain.c32 to boot a local disk. My settings: ====================== label local MENU LABEL Local operating system in hard drive kernel chain.c32 append hd0 ====================== It gave me "Error: Couldn't read the first disk sector" If I change the settings as ====================== label local MENU LABEL
2014 Apr 23
1
*.c32 for efi64 and efi32?
/sudo/pseudo code/ On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 9:32 AM, Don Cupp <doncuppjr at yahoo.com> wrote: I actually propose another strategy that may kills many birds with one stone. I think it should be able to be handled internally. Right now, we take a kernel argument as a literal file name hdt.c32 really mean load file hdt.c32. That great, it works, that is how most config files are written.
2014 Apr 23
2
*.c32 for efi64 and efi32?
On 04/23/2014 09:06 PM, Ady wrote: > Suggestions and patches are surely welcome. Ady, Mine is only suggestion, and for sure I will just follow what Syslinux developers decide. Thanks. Steven. -- Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/47CF935C Fingerprint: 0240 1FEB 695D 7112 62F0 8796 11C1 12DA 47CF 935C
2014 Mar 08
2
Syslinux EFI + TFTPBOOT Support
On 03/08/2014 10:06 PM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> Hi Gene, >> > Thanks. As you suggested, I did a test about 6.03-pre6, and I still got >> > the same issue. My client machine >> > still only shows: >> > ==================== >> > Getting cached packets >> > My IP is 192.168.120.1 >> > ==================== >> > The syslog log
2013 Sep 13
0
Problem with pxelinux 5.10 and memtest86+ 4.20
On 09/13/2013 06:36 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Steven Shiau <steven at nchc.org.tw> wrote: >> On 2013/9/12 11:55, Steven Shiau wrote: >>> >>> Deal developers, >>> I'd like to follow the thread >>> http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/syslinux/2013-April/019761.html >>> but change the subject to 'pxelinux
2013 Sep 12
0
Problem with pxelinux 5.10 and memtest86+ 4.20
On 2013/9/12 ?? 11:55, Steven Shiau wrote: > Deal developers, > I'd like to follow the thread > http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/syslinux/2013-April/019761.html > but change the subject to 'pxelinux 5.10 and memtest86+ 4.20' and > provide more test cases. > > The pxelinux before version 5, e.g. version 4.06, worked very well with > memtest86+ 4.20, all my PXE
2013 Oct 29
0
syslinux/isolinux 6.2 "Error: Couldn't read the first disk sector"
My bad, I meant version 6.02, not 6.2 Steven. On 10/29/2013 11:28 AM, Steven Shiau wrote: > After switching to version 6.2, I am having a problem to use chain.c32 > to boot a local disk. > My settings: > ====================== > label local > MENU LABEL Local operating system in hard drive > kernel chain.c32 > append hd0 > ====================== > It gave me
2013 Sep 20
0
One DHCP/PXE config for BIOS, EFI32, and EFI64 clients?
On 09/20/2013 02:34 AM, Ady wrote: >> There might be an alternative (and possibly others too): let the user >> select the appropriate firmware from within pxelinux.cfg/default. >> >> So, keep using the same method you used in previous versions, instead >> of selecting the Syslinux cfg / firmware from the DHCP snippet that >> Daniel posted. >> >>
2013 Sep 20
0
Problem with pxelinux 5.10 and memtest86+ 4.20
On 09/13/2013 06:36 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: > I believe this is a result of how/where memtest wants to be loaded. I > can confirm it's present in 5.11-pre9 but appears resolved for me in > 6.02-pre16. I should be able to test in Workstation-9.0.2 tomorrow. Hi Gene, Were you able to reproduce the issue on VMWare WS 9? If so, when we will expect the fixed version (5.x) to be released?
2013 Sep 26
0
Problem with pxelinux 5.10 and memtest86+ 4.20
On 09/24/2013 04:58 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: > I'm not sure if there will be another 5.xx release or pre-release, > except possibly more testing with some changes I've made recently for > lwIP-enabled PXELINUX (lpxelinux.0) Gene, Got it. If possible, please have another 5.xx release since 6.x is a big jump from 5.x. Thank you very much. Steven. -- Steven Shiau <steven _at_ nchc
2013 Sep 26
0
Problem with pxelinux 5.10 and memtest86+ 4.20
On 09/27/2013 02:37 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > "Big jump" in what way? Oh, I should not use that strong words... Actually what I meant is the implementation of EFI support so the file directories in the release tarball are different. Steven. -- Steven Shiau <steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan.
2013 Oct 17
0
One DHCP/PXE config for BIOS, EFI32, and EFI64 clients?
On 2013/9/27 ?? 07:28, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > It wouldn't be too hard to implement, just a matter of someone finding > the time. > > -hpa Great! I believe this feature is very useful for a PXE server. Since syslinux 6.02 is released, may we expect this feature to be added in 6.03? Am I too greedy? :) Thanks for all the great job about syslinux. Appreciate. Steven. -- Steven
2013 Sep 16
4
One DHCP/PXE config for BIOS, EFI32, and EFI64 clients?
Dear all, I'd like to have a DHCP/PXE server for different arch of clients, i.e. BIOS, EFI32, and EFI64 clients. As described here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720589 What Daniel has proposed (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720589#10) should work, i.e. Using a file called pxelinux.cfg/bios containing the following 2 lines:
2014 Apr 23
0
*.c32 for efi64 and efi32?
I actually propose another strategy that may kills many birds with one stone. I think it should be able to be handled internally. Right now, we take a kernel argument as a literal file name hdt.c32 really mean load file hdt.c32. That great, it works, that is how most config files are written. All we need to do is change the expectation a little from a literal to a directive with a literal
2014 Mar 07
2
Syslinux EFI + TFTPBOOT Support
On 2014?03?07? 23:05, Ady wrote: > I understand that these remarks might seem not the main issue, but I > tend to think that once you are successful while using only "default" > > values and in a minimalistic case, you could add complexity > (different paths, multiple firmwares, additional kernels, multiple > cfg files...). Ady, Thanks. I will follow your advice to