similar to: various DNS scenarios / setups with samba4 + BIND9

No, this is not needed. Solution here in this is simple. search primary.domain.tld # optional extra search domains after the primary. nameserver IP_AD-DC_OF_THIS_SERVER_FIRST nameserver IP_AD-DC_others Run : samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ And your done, all needed records are fixed/updated. This goes wrong if the IP of the running server isnt the first and/or if search is setup

And, BTW, right now, I am able to see my problem via the following 3 ways... 1) Through Windows DNS Manager, I cannot add, change or delete any DNS records from: mycompany.loc samdom.mycompany.net mycompany.net I *can* add, change and delete DNS records from: _msdcs.samdom.mycompany.net mycompany.com 7.168.192.in-addr.arpa 5.168.192.in-addr.arpa 3.168.192.in-addr.arpa

Louis, I appreciate your efforts with my predicament. I'm very sorry to say that your advice hasn't gotten me to a solution. After updating my /etc/network/interfaces to put my localhost IP address first (192.168.3.201, for example), saving, restarting services, rebooting, running "samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ", saving, rebooting, etc., I still cannot add, edit or

You did change : the DLZ option from 9.8 to 9.9 ? check your bind options. this .. dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND 9.8.x # database "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9.so"; # For BIND 9.9.x database "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; # For BIND 9.10.x # database "dlopen

Nice shell script,?Louis. Here are the results: Collected config ?--- 2019-06-20-12:46 ----------- Hostname: umbriel DNS Domain: samdom.mycompany.net FQDN: umbriel.samdom.mycompany.net ipaddress: 192.168.3.203? ----------- Samba is running as an AD DC ----------- ? ? ? ?Checking file: /etc/os-release NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="16.04.6 LTS (Xenial Xerus)" ID=ubuntu

I've been working on this problem for a few hours. Here are some updates: Many of the domains I listed are duplicates of domains managed by other DNS servers on my network. There was no point in having them in Samba AD, so I deleted the zones in Windows DNS Manager and created slaves in my named.conf.local folder, so that they'd pull the records from my authoritative BIND DNS server,

> > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_AppArmor_and_SELinux_Integration > > > > > > > > selinux is not installed. > > > > Firewall is not active. > > > > iptables is not active. > > > The problem appears to have something to do with Apparmor. > > > > > > > > From that page, >

Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that. I can only add then, all three DC's in my little net are installed with bind 9.18 and working all the same without errors. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Stefan Kania via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um 20:47: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> I have exact that running:

That the script isnt running, shows that whats going wrong.. Your resolving.. And then thats also why your kerberos settings are not working. And, that is what your problem is. Show this: cat /etc/hosts cat /etc/resolv.conf hostname -f hostname -d hostname -s hostname -A hostname -I cat /etc/krb5.conf The bind setup on my Debian (10) Buster AD-DC's with Bind9_dlz About same setup as

On 16/01/2023 18:56, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> >>> >>> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>>> Hi to all, >>>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the

Hi there. Setup is Centos 7.4 with Samba 4.7.4. I In our second office I've got configured Centos 7.5 with latest samba ad + dlz, which I've set just as Andrew suggested, using separate bind9 that forwards queries to the samba AD(dlz) for the given dns zone. Unfortunately the office isn't operational yet, so I can't share any experience. Best On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:11 AM

On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> >> >> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>> Hi to all, >>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >>> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports

On Sun, 5 May 2019 00:11:40 +1000 Rob Thoman via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > We migrated the domain to AD on a ubuntu 18.04 box with samba 4.7.6. > The DNS backend is DLZ > > We are seeing DNS issues as per below > > When using dnsupdate we get the following error. The server can > resolve the hostname(itself) > > added interface

Hi Stefan, I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the bullseye-backports. I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. As like 9.16 I use the "dlz_bind9_18.so" entry in named.conf. If you need further information to compare just ask. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um

Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Stefan, > > I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the > bullseye-backports. > > I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. > On the first DC it's running like I expacted, but on the second one I'm having the provlem. > As like 9.16 I use the

Hi all, I am running samba 4.0.5 as Active-Directory Domain Controller with bind9 9.8 and I am using the BIND9_DLZ mech. I have setup my DNS quite exactly as described on the samba4_dns HowTo, but I am facing following problems: Win2000 clients are NOT ABLE to update/add/delete dynamic dns ressource records to the DNS database, because it seems they cannot be verified by samba4? The BIND9 log

Hai, As Andrew also told, setup a caching dns and forward the samba dns zones. This works great, i use this on 2 internet connected servers. What we (i) also want to know is your running OS and samba version. That does help us, yes, really.. ;-) A very simple to setup for a forwarding dns. Install bind9 on the ftp server. Set in the named.options. dnssec-enable yes;

Hi all, it seems the workaround is no longer needed, got an extra update of bind 9.18.28 today: --- Changes for bind9 (bind9 bind9-dnsutils bind9-host bind9-libs bind9-utils) --- bind9 (1:9.18.28-1~deb12u2) bookworm-security; urgency=medium * Fix the assertion failure in samba-libs DLZ module. (Closes #1074378) Tested it, and yes, it worked... Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama

Hi Benedikt, > > I have to add a second DC to a Zone. > I use the sernet packages Version 4.11 on a debian 10 host. > > The bind refuses to start: > > root at addc-zone02:~# systemctl status bind9 > ? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server > Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/bind9.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) > Active: failed (Result:

On 09/01/2023 14:35, Arnaud FLORENT via samba wrote: > Hi everyone and best wishes for 2023 > > > I think i'm facing the bind 9 DLZ lockup problem described here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#The_Lockup_Problem > > > running samba 4.16 AD on ubuntu 20.04 with bind 9.16.15 > > there are about 500 computers on the network.