similar to: build failures due to missing rpl_optarg

I needed to add a few patches to be able to build libguestfs 1.20.2 out of tree. Mostly srcdir/builddir issues -- I think that I had posted something for building the daemon before. As mentioned on IRC, I found that compiling (Ruby bindings) caused config.h file shipped with the Ruby headers to be included rather than ${builddir}/config.h. This can be fixed because the relevant checks can be

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 09:42:52AM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > I'm pleased to announce libguestfs 1.26, a library and set of tools > > This fails to link at least in sles11sp3, 1.25.37 was still ok: > > ... > [ 288s] virt_index_validate-index-validate.o: In function `main': > [ 288s]

I'm pleased to announce libguestfs 1.26, a library and set of tools for accessing and modifying virtual machine disk images. This release took more than 6 months of work by a considerable number of people, and has many new features (see release notes below). You can get libguestfs 1.26 here: Main website: http://libguestfs.org/ Source:

Hi Patch "drm/nouveau: use drm_mm in preference to custom code doing the same thing" in nouveau tree introduced new deadlock possibility, for which lockdep complains loudly: [ 1541.070202] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: Allocating FIFO number 3 [ 1541.084772] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: nouveau_channel_alloc: initialised FIFO 3 [ 2417.733440] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0:

Dear Sirs and Madams, I run a small visual effects production company, Hammerhead Productions. We'd like to have an easily extensible inexpensive relatively high-performance storage network using open-source components. I was hoping that OCFS2 would be that system. I have a half-dozen 2 TB fileservers I'd like the rest of the network to see as a single 12 TB disk, with the aggregate

Lots of bugfixes all over the map. Thanks to all for testing and patches! Adam Jackson (8): modesetting: Lie less in the man page modesetting: Document Option "DoubleShadow" in the man page xfree86: Fix Option "MaxClients" validation modesetting: Don't free(dst) in drmmode_prop_info_copy glamor_egl: Don't initialize on llvmpipe

This is a set of autoconf macros used by the configure.ac scripts in other Xorg modular packages, and is needed to generate new versions of their configure scripts with autoconf. This release changes the XORG_CHECK_MALLOC_ZERO macro to stop testing if malloc(0) returns NULL and instead assumes it might, so that software still works properly if it is running with a different malloc implementation

I recently upgraded to Rtools28 to build a package under Windows. I see that g77 is no longer in Rtools, but it does have gfortran, and it uses version: GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.2.1-sjlj (mingw32-2) I am compiling some old fortran code as part of a larger project. When I do that, I get undefined references: gcc.exe: s_cmp.o: No such file or directory gcc.exe: s_copy.o: No such file or directory

In commit a0f155e96 'KVM: Initialize irqfd from kvm_init()', when kvm_init() is called the second time (e.g kvm-amd.ko and kvm-intel.ko), kvm_arch_init() will fail with -EEXIST, then kvm_irqfd_exit() will be called on the error handling path. This way, the kvm_irqfd system will not be ready. This patch fix the following: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at

In commit a0f155e96 'KVM: Initialize irqfd from kvm_init()', when kvm_init() is called the second time (e.g kvm-amd.ko and kvm-intel.ko), kvm_arch_init() will fail with -EEXIST, then kvm_irqfd_exit() will be called on the error handling path. This way, the kvm_irqfd system will not be ready. This patch fix the following: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at

I''ve upgraded to linux 3.10 and enabled extended inode refs and skinny metadata extent refs with these commands: btrfstune -r /dev/sdc1 btrfstune -x /dev/sdc1 Since then, I have "WARNING: at fs/btrfs/backref.c:903 find_parent_nodes+0x616/0x815 [btrfs]()" showing up like crazy: # grep -c "WARNING: at fs/btrfs/backref.c:903" syslog 181819 That''s after just

On 9/24/19 10:55 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 15:41, Frank Cox <theatre at sasktel.net> wrote: >> >> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released? >> >> I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate is kind of a

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100035 Bug ID: 100035 Summary: nouveau runtime pm causes soft lockups and hangs during boot Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

While running some doveadm expunge -A mailbox Spam savedbefore 30d and doveadm purge -A after 2010-08-26 16:20:51 auth: Error: net_accept() failed: Too many open files 2010-08-26 16:20:51 master: Warning: service(auth): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped 2010-08-26 16:21:21 auth: Panic: file auth-request-handler.c: line 85 (auth_request_handler_unref): assertion failed:

Hi, Chris (cc) and I try to get the SGE master monitor work with Apple Leopard dtrace. Unfortunately we are stuck with the error msg below. Anyone having an idea what could be the cause? What I can rule out as cause is function inlining for the reasons explained below. Background information on SGE master monitor implementation is under http://wiki.gridengine.info/wiki/index.php/Dtrace

Hi guys! I'm getting the following warn on 4.15-rc1, on GTX 560 Ti: [ 9.430433] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: NVIDIA GF114 (0ce000a1) ... [ 9.585172] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: bios: version 70.24.2e.00.02 ... [ 9.772204] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: fb: 1024 MiB GDDR5 [ 9.777342] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 9.782106] refcount_t: increment on 0; use-after-free. [ 9.787522] WARNING:

See this thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-June/thread.html#00012 This commit also adds a regression test of vddk password=- and password=-FD. --- tests/Makefile.am | 4 ++ plugins/vddk/vddk.h | 1 + plugins/vddk/reexec.c | 43 ++++++++++++- plugins/vddk/vddk.c | 2 +-

1. If we run a few passes in a sequence ..is the bytecode file transformed after each pass in sequence i.e if we have a) opt -pass1 -pass2 -pass3 < in.bc > out.bc b)opt -pass1 -pass2 < in.bc > tmp.bc opt -pass3 < tmp.bc > out.bc are the above two equivalent ? what I basically want is to run my pass on an optimised bytecode , so should i optimize it and get a new bytecode

Greetings all, I see the following issue during snap creation under IO: Transaction commit calls btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes() that locks the delalloc_inodes list, fetches the first inode, unlocks the list, triggers btrfs_alloc_delalloc_work/btrfs_queue_worker for this inode and then locks the list again. Then it checks the head of the list again. In my case, this is always exactly the same

Hi, I'm new to this list and joined since I am volunteering as a tech admin for a non profit organization called CouchSurfing (.com) where we tried to move the web servers to Xen zones and this has proven quite unstable since the our defined zones tends to crash on a daily basis with the latest CentOS 5 Xen updates. The physical boxes have 2 quad core 1.6GHz Xeon CPU's and 4 GB RAM, there