similar to: UPS batteries, resolved

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "UPS batteries, resolved"

2013 Feb 11
5
OT: UPS battery vendor
Hi, folks. I need some new replacement batteries for rack-mount APC UPSes. My old vender... well, the salesman I dealt with for several years left about a year and a half ago, and last year's purchase was a disaster (wrong batteries, wrong batteries, months to get the shipping to return the wrong batteries...), so I'm looking for a new, reliable vendor who does US government contract
2010 Mar 26
2
apcupsd, APC UPSs, and batteries, resolved
Well, here's the tale: we got a "replacement kit" for some APC SmartUPS 3000 - rackmount UPSs. The "kit", costing about half of what APC is asking, is just the batteries, and you pull the tray out, open it up, and swap out the batteries. Except, I did this on one... and the replace battery light never went out. Not using apcupsd's apctest, not pushing the button. The
2015 Jul 14
1
Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 14.07.2015 um 16:17 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >> My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're >> supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows >> binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks >> highly of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? >
2010 Feb 02
0
Was, Re: APC Smart-ups "status codes" (slightly OT), is replacement batteries
> > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 16:53 -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: <battery change tale o' woe snipped> >> But the idiot light's still on. <snip> Well, I followed the link to the NUT info, and tried a "manual" calibration, and still no joy. Swapping in a cartridge that's still good, the light goes out, so it's not the unit. However, googling for
2009 Oct 19
1
Megatec driver, this UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries, Infosec model E4 / 5000
Ubuntu 8.04 Nut : Version: 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu7.2 Hello, I choose the megatec driver and I connect through a serial cable. I receive a "This UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries" message. I know this is not an error but I don't really what I have to do next. Here is the result of /lib/nut/megatec -a infosec -DDD debug level is '3'
2020 Nov 01
0
ups.test.result meaning
On Saturday 31 October 2020 20:13:48 Rick Dicaire wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 2:42 PM Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com> wrote: > > I'm going to guess that since your test runtime of 305 is very close > > to the low limit of 300, that's the warning. Not yet a fail, but > > very, very close. > > I tried setting > override.battery.runtime.low = 60
2008 Jun 05
0
RECALL: Lithium batteries for Polycom Soundstation 2W
Just released by the CPSC on their recalls mailing list; please forward to any venues where you feel operators or resellers of the SoundStation might be, with this preface included. My 2W had a battery with the part code 1520-07804-002; its date code was GP0806, and therefore predates the recall period. Cheers, -- jra ----- Begin forwarded message ----- This message consists of the following:
2020 Nov 01
1
ups.test.result meaning
On Sunday 01 November 2020 09:02:56 Charles Lepple wrote: > Gene, > > you might have missed this email, and I admit I wasn't very precise > with my wording. Yes, or at least I don't recall it, which at my age IS a possibility. More below as needed. > This particular UPS model is returning a fixed (in the sense of > "constant") integer "24" (not
2013 Dec 02
1
Thanks on 6.5
Hey, Johnny et al, Thanks for the hard work, and quick followup to upstream. What's especially nice for us, and for other folks using CentOS at US federal gov't agencies, is that finally, the stock ssh-agent works seamlessly with pkcs11 and PIV/CAC cards, which is being required across the board. We'd been building our own openssh pieces... (and it was my manager that pushed that
2015 Mar 01
2
New batteries and another attempt to get nut running
Hi Charles; I hope this finds you well. Here is dmesg output: gene at coyote:~$ dmesg |grep Belkin [ 3.315667] usb 2-3: Product: Belkin UPS [ 3.315669] usb 2-3: Manufacturer: Belkin [ 4.084258] generic-usb 0003:050D:0751.0009: hiddev0,hidraw4: USB HID v1.11 Device [Belkin Belkin UPS] on usb-0000:00:02.0-3/input I have configured it to use this generic-usb, and probably made it less
2018 Jun 08
5
C7, encryption, and clevis
On 06/08/18 13:48, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Frank Cox wrote: >>>> so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1? >> >> With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I >> wonder if this outfit is actually still in compliance with the terms of >> their license for this software, whatever it may be? >> >> If
2017 Apr 03
0
battery not installed, but battery still 100% and NUT 2.7.2-4 does not catch this and report a error
On Monday 03 April 2017 14:13:08 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: Back on the mailing list, where such belongs. > On Mon, 3 Apr 2017, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Nut, IIRC, can do a periodic battery test by putting it offline, > > using the battery, for a predetermined length of time, weekly, > > monthly etc, > > We definitely don't want that in this instance either! Why not?
2010 Dec 06
0
Coolkey and esc and "SmartCard"s, oh, my
What's happening: I put my "SmartCard" in the reader, and the Coolkey phone home window pops up. I close it, and the SmartCard manager window pops up, saying it's not initialized. Neither of these should be happening with these cards (US federal gov't issue, not DoD). Googling, I find <https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0068.html>, and in that, it says (in part):
2014 Feb 01
0
Motion Detecting Camera
mark wrote With the continuing annoyance from motion, my manager's asked me to go looking again for a video surveillance appliance: basically, a motion-detecting DVR and cameras. The big thing, of course, is a) price (this is a US federal gov't agency, and being civilian, money is *tight*, don't give me the libertarian/GOP line about how freely we spend, thankyouverymuch), b) it has
2016 May 03
0
C6 Firefox 45.1 segmentation faults
Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Akemi Yagi" <amyagi at gmail.com> >>> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> >>> Sent: Tuesday, 3 May, 2016 01:32:55 >>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] C6 Firefox 45.1 segmentation
2016 May 03
1
C6 Firefox 45.1 segmentation faults
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:34 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Akemi Yagi wrote: >> To add to your fun, let me present my wish list: >> >> mplayer-gui and libquicktime (latest version from PUIAS) and >> mlt >= 0.9.4 >> > Ummm, NO. NOT the latter, under any circumstance... or hadn't you missed > the huge announcements that Apple would no longer
2019 Feb 22
0
iptables 2 firewalld
Y'all may remember me fighting this a few weeks back. I did finally succeed, and thought that my awk script might be helpful to others. Yes, it's really simple, it uses the build-in FORWARD chain. The line where I skip the definition of those chains is because it *is* built in. To use it, I did an iptables-save on the firewall that's currently in use, changed the physdev devices to
2014 Jan 31
3
OT hardware question
With the continuing annoyance from motion, my manager's asked me to go looking again for a video surveillance appliance: basically, a motion-detecting DVR and cameras. The big thing, of course, is a) price (this is a US federal gov't agency, and being civilian, money is *tight*, don't give me the libertarian/GOP line about how freely we spend, thankyouverymuch), b) it has to be on the
2004 Aug 27
2
Samba, the GPL and SCO
For those of you following the IBM vs SCO legal case, you have probably noticed that SCO has said that the GPL is invalid. IBM appears to make the reasonable case that you can't say something is void, and then rely on it. INAL, but why is SCO allowed to distribute Samba without agreeing to the GPL? That's like buying a car, then claiming the sale agreement is bogus but you still want
2018 Jun 28
0
EXTERNAL: Samba issues with Win 10 (one last followup)
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:50:06PM -0400, mark wrote: > Wells, Roger K. wrote: > > On 06/28/2018 10:35 AM, mark wrote: > >> > >> Just ran into a problem: someone with a new laptop, running Win 10, > >> version 1709, tried to map their home directory (served from a CentOS 6.9 > >> box, and it fails, with Windows complaining that it no longer supports