similar to: autofs and LDAP automount maps

Hi, What is the magic juju that I have to put in /etc/sysconfig/autofs to get autofs to default to using NFSv4, rather than NFSv3, for mounting file systems? I don't want to place these flags into the automount maps themselves because we have a varied network with Sun, CentOS, RedHat and Macintosh systems, and the flags that have to get added to automount maps (which we distribute centrally

We have a particular file system that we're trying to keep in sync between two FreeBSD/ZFS servers using Rsync. The file system has many millions of files, and about 4TB of data total. Rsync takes HOURS to run, even when there are no files to transfer. Just the comparison itself takes hours. Is there any way to speed up the transfer? The command line I'm using is:

Hi, I was wondering if there is any momentum to get OpenLDAP's back_perl feature installed into the CentOS Yum repository. If this isn't the right mailing list for such a request, could someone point me in the correct direction? Thanks! Tim Gustafson Baskin School of Engineering UC Santa Cruz tjg at soe.ucsc.edu 831-459-5354

Hi, Is there any sample code out there that might give me a sort of "bare bones" example of how to create an Ogg streaming server that would produce a video/audio stream suitable for consumption by the HTML5 VIDEO element? The video being streamed will be generated dynamically using libGL. I have the pixel data for each frame of the libGL rendered image available to me, so really I am

I agree that this sounds like, and indeed is, a recipe for disaster. I was going to explain some of the woes of our environment but I don't think it's actually relevant after looking at my problem a bit more. If I'm way off base I'm happy to be herded back, but please tolerate me as I share what I am seeing today because I really hope to solve the narrow issue of SMB file access

> > When I try to > > access even an already-mounted NFS directory to which I have permission, > > gssproxy complains: > > > > Jul 10 08:55:51 smb gssproxy: gssproxy[1469]: (OID: { 1 2 840 113554 1 2 > 2 > > }) Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more information, > > Client 'host/smb.soe.ucsc.edu at AD.SOE.UCSC.EDU' not found in

Hello, We share out user home dirs from a a solaris server via samba. On a windows machine I can change file permissions to files in my samba home dir. From OS X 10.4.2 all the files are at 700 and chmod does nothing to them. From the GUI get info just says that I can read and write. The smb.conf on the sun server has the following entries under the [home] section: browseable = no read only =

Hi Rowland, Thanks for the prompt reply. The gidNumber attribute is set to the appropriate primary UNIX group for each user already. Are there any ways to work around the ID issue, or at least to mitigate some of the consequences? We looked at updating uid/gid values across the board but there is so much data owned by existing users and groups that we haven't been able to proceed. On

I should add that the samba.log file was logging NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS errors when authentication attempts were failing. Workstations in the domains were still able to authenticate, however, and I verified that the DNS records were still correct. The SRV records were all in place and the domain controllers' host names were resolving. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Eric Shell

On 09/07/2019 20:00, Eric Shell wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Currently Domain Users doesn't have a gidNumber because it didn't have > a corresponding group in OpenLDAP, which is our master directory. Did you miss the bit where I said Domain Users MUST have a gidNumber ? > > The primary Unix group gidNumber for each user is replicated from > their OpenLDAP records, but

Hi Rowland, Currently Domain Users doesn't have a gidNumber because it didn't have a corresponding group in OpenLDAP, which is our master directory. The primary Unix group gidNumber for each user is replicated from their OpenLDAP records, but the AD groups have a suffix due to historical name collisions - a POSIX group called harry would be harry-group in AD, but with a matching

Ugh, I knew I forgot something. Here is smb.conf: --- [global] kerberos method = system keytab template homedir = /soe/%U workgroup = BSOE template shell = /bin/bash security = ads realm = AD.SOE.UCSC.EDU idmap config BSOE : schema_mode = rfc2307 idmap config BSOE : range = 100-999999 idmap config BSOE : backend = ad idmap config BSOE : unix_nss_info = yes idmap config BSOE : unix_primary_group

On my CentOS5 boxes the automounter fails after the last update to autofs.x86_64 1:5.0.1-0.rc2.177.el5 No update is seen on CentOS6 and things still work there. The home directory of users is setup using an auto.home map which is distributed using NIS: * fsutrecht02:/export/home/& /nobackup -noacl nasutrecht01:/nobackup/& /snapshot -ro fazant:/home_backup/ This maps a users

I have several CentOS 5.2 workstations in a Sun Solaris NIS domain and Solaris NFS servers (all Solaris 8). Frequently the auto mounter hangs with very high utilization -- I think it might be due to the Solaris 8 servers only using NFSv3 and the CentOS wanting to use NFSv4. How can I set the system to use NFSv3 globally, even for auto mount maps from my ancient Solaris NIS domain (which I wold

I added Domain = ourdomain to /etc/idpmapd.conf, and restarted rpc-idmapd, then autofs. And nfslock, for good measure. service nfs-idmap status Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status nfs-idmap.service nfs-idmap.service - NFSv4 ID-name mapping daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/nfs-idmap.service; disabled) Active: active (running) since Thu 2015-04-23 11:23:24 EDT; 2min 59s ago

Hi, I was installing hundreds of packages on a machine with a single call to install.packages() and after a long time the call to install.packages() finally returned with the following warnings and errors: Warning messages: 1: packages ?hgu133aprobe?, ?hgu95av2.db?, ?BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2?, ?BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm10?, ?BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.UCSC.dm3.masked?,

Hi Marco, You will hit muliple problems, most can be solved. Im installing a new member here with samba 4.8.5 and building new samba 4.8.6 atm. ;-). Im (trying to ) fix this also again in this new setup. Below it a bit of what i know. > Client are in DHCP, so it is hard to use 'normal' NFSv3 mount, eg > security by IP. If they register ( or are registered) in the dns correctly

Thanks for the quick replies. One domain is at Windows Server 2008 functional level, and the other is Windows Server 2012 R2. The samba 4 servers are running 4.2.10 and the samba 3 servers are running 3.6.23, both from rpms available from either the CentOS 6 or 7 repos (samba 4 on CentOS 7, samba 3 on CentOS 6). Here's the smb.conf used on the two samba 4 servers: [global] > workgroup

Hai, I'm getting somewhere, here you go, a snap of what i have atm. And what works atm. Im asuming you have winbind already running. Obligated is A+PTR record in the DNS. You can turn or the rdns check in krb5.conf but i did not test that. # Tested on Debian Stretch - NFSv4 SERVER apt-get install --auto-remove nfs-kernel-server systemctl stop nfs-* Added in krb5.conf below the

Hai, Hmm.. Bummer.. I just discovered the debian package dont have the vfs_nfs4acl include in the build. And because of that it's not in my packages. I'll have a look into it, see what i can make of it. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > L.P.H. van Belle via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 9