similar to: Select first element of each factor and convert to NA

I've got a new setup (different building) where Asterisk is sitting between the PBX and phone company on a E&M T1 line. Mitel PBX <-> Asterisk <-> Phone company Inbound works. Asterisk gets the in-band digits from the phone company and hands the call off to the Mitel just fine. Outbound is weird. Asterisk seems to expect that the mitel will send routing information

I'm not sure if this is the official behavior but I would expect the na.action function applied to a lm object to return the na.action. Here is what I mean. > x<-0:10 > y<-x+rnorm(10) Warning message: In x + rnorm(10) : longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length > y[5]<-NA > m<-lm(y~x) > m$na.action 5 5 attr(,"class") [1]

Hi, I have three matrices which could be, for example: A = 0, NA NA, 3 B = 1, NA 0, NA C = 1, NA 1, 1 (The point is that they all may have NA's in some cells) QUESTION: How do I perform a element-by-element sum of the elements of these three matrices (A + B + C), ignoring NA's, to obtain: D = 2, NA 1, 4

Hi, I am attaching a plot where you can see there are a few "jumps" (plots 1, 4, 5 and 6), due to incidents with the measuring sensors (basically someone touching the sensor). I need to revert those changes to have a plot without unreal measurements, so make those fragments go back to its original pattern before the jump. I have used the function cpt.mean {changepoints} so I can

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2486 Bug ID: 2486 Summary: allow ForceCommand none or similar Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Folks, My question concerns the SIP Notify that is being sent to ... device. You can see it in the following line: Voicemail: 0/0 Shows no Voice mail but I did leave a voice mail at the extension. Any suggestion on what I should look for in my * setup. I am not worried about the 481 coming back for the other side yet. Once I get a handle on the Notify, I'll work on the 481.

Hi all, I've experienced this problem using StructTS(x) when the *first* element of x is a NA (R:R1.7.0, os: w2ksp4). Please look at the following code: a=rep(1:7,10) library(ts) #this works StructTS(a) #this works x=a x[2]=NA StructTS(x) #this doesn't work x=a x[1]=NA StructTS(x) The last command returns this error "Error in optim(init[mask], getLike,

I'm trying to run distributed ThinLTO without thin archives. When I do, I get an error in the optimizer when clang tries to open a nonexistent file: clang++ -flto=thin -Xclang -fno-lto-unit -O3 -c main.cpp -o main.o clang++ -flto=thin -Xclang -fno-lto-unit -O3 -c lib/lib.cpp -o lib/lib.o clang++ -flto=thin -Xclang -fno-lto-unit -O3 -c src/lib.cpp -o src/lib.o llvm-ar -format gnu qcs lib.a

Hi, This is probably a small query but one I'm struggling with: I have a list in which I had elements which were NA, I removed them, by doing: list2 <- lapply(list, na.omit), However this leaves the element there with 'character(0)' in place as well as attributes: e.g. [[978]] character(0) attr(,"na.action") [1] 1 attr(,"class") [1] "omit" I want

Hi Guys, I was wondering what our next steps should be to solve the slow write times. Recently I was debugging a large code and writing a lot of output at every time step. When I tried writing to our gluster disks, it was taking over a day to do a single time step whereas if I had the same program (same hardware, network) write to our nfs disk the time per time-step was about 45 minutes.

Hello all, I'm trying to calculate the standar desviation and I'm using the function sd(x,na.rm=TRUE) and I have this error:? Error in var(x, na.rm = na.rm) : no complete element pairs . Why happen this?, What can I do to solve it?. x is list of three numbers which I have from a table. Thanks so much from Spain Carlos Morales Diego

Are you sure using conv=sync is what you want? I normally use conv=fdatasync, I'll look up the difference between the two and see if it affects your test. -b ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pat Haley" <phaley at mit.edu> > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com> > Cc: "Ravishankar N" <ravishankar at redhat.com>,

Hi, Today we experimented with some of the FUSE options that we found in the list. Changing these options had no effect: gluster volume set test-volume performance.cache-max-file-size 2MB gluster volume set test-volume performance.cache-refresh-timeout 4 gluster volume set test-volume performance.cache-size 256MB gluster volume set test-volume performance.write-behind-window-size 4MB gluster

I have a 5 column matrix like 12 10 8 6 3 10 9 8 7 5 14 NA 4 NA NA NA 15 NA 10 NA 5 ... I want to select the position of the first entry for each row <=5 for example, for the first row, I want to select the last element and return its position as 5; for th e third row, I want to select the third element and return its position as 3; similarly for the 4th row, I want to select the fifth

Hi Ben, Sorry this took so long, but we had a real-time forecasting exercise last week and I could only get to this now. Backend Hardware/OS: * Much of the information on our back end system is included at the top of http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-April/030529.html * The specific model of the hard disks is SeaGate ENTERPRISE CAPACITY V.4 6TB

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Pat Haley <phaley at mit.edu> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Decided to try another tests of gluster mounted via FUSE vs gluster > mounted via NFS, this time using the software we run in production (i.e. > our ocean model writing a netCDF file). > > gluster mounted via NFS the run took 2.3 hr > > gluster mounted via FUSE: the run took

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Pat Haley <phaley at mit.edu> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> Today we experimented with some of the FUSE options that we found in the >> list. >> >> Changing these options had no effect: >> >>

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Pat Haley <phaley at mit.edu> wrote: > > Hi, > > Today we experimented with some of the FUSE options that we found in the > list. > > Changing these options had no effect: > > gluster volume set test-volume performance.cache-max-file-size 2MB > gluster volume set test-volume performance.cache-refresh-timeout 4 > gluster

Hi All, Decided to try another tests of gluster mounted via FUSE vs gluster mounted via NFS, this time using the software we run in production (i.e. our ocean model writing a netCDF file). gluster mounted via NFS the run took 2.3 hr gluster mounted via FUSE: the run took 44.2 hr The only problem with using gluster mounted via NFS is that it does not respect the group write permissions which

hello, i have something like: out<-list() for(i in 1:n){ data<-gen(...) #fixed size data out[[i]]<- fun(data) } > object.size(out[[1]]) 6824 In principle 1 GB should allow n = 1024^3/6824 = 157347? i have about 2GB are not taken by other processes. however, I can see the memory shrinking quite rapidly on my system monitor and have to stop the simulation after only n=300. why