similar to: Making Linux and domain users the same

Good day oh technical ones . I was running Samba 4 (client only, not using it as a DC so effectively running Samba 3 code from the Samba 4 tree) and, other than a little "Gotcha!" regarding decoding Kerberos PACs, it was all working perfectly. Then recently I had to upgrade, to "4.2.0pre1-GIT-b505111" (I had to upgrade the OS on the server

Hello, We're having a problem with "Samba 4" joined to a "Server 2008 R2" domain (at "Server 2008" functional level across the forest). The interesting thing is that this only affects a single user - all other accounts work without problems. When accessing our main server using that account, "smbd" always reports "can't parse the PAC:

Good day oh technical ones . I was running Samba 4 (client only, not using it as a DC so effectively running Samba 3 code from the Samba 4 tree) and, other than a little "Gotcha!" regarding decoding Kerberos PACs, it was all working perfectly. Then recently I had to upgrade, to "4.2.0pre1-GIT-b505111" (I had to upgrade the OS on the server

I have a Samba 3.0.24-7 on Fedora 6 as a member of an Windows NT 4.0 domain, with a simple share setup with ACLs. The permissions on the share from Windows XP Pro Security tab shows Everyone, and root (Unix Group\root) without any Permissions. When trying to add permissions from XP while logged on as CPDOM+admin the error is display "Unable to save permission changes on "share

We observe a difference between a Windows 7 client and Windows 2003/XP client when accessing directories that should be accessible via the UNIX accounts primary group GID. Windows client refuses access. Ignoring for now why the two different client behaviours (either some subtle difference in the requests or the way the Samba reply is dealt with) the question is what should be the correct

Hi all, I'm experiencing a problem when NTBACKING'UP my W2000 Server files against a Linux 2.4.9 + ReiserFS 3.6 file system + Samba share. It works OK for the first 4 Gb's around file size. Then ntbackup stops serving data and the file on the samba side appears to be downsized to 0 and growing ssssslowly. Once you stop ntbackup by killing the process, the file reappears at its real

Hi I have Debian/stable and samba 3.2.5. I have set this (smb.conf): ... create mode = 0770 directory mask = 0770 ... and the files created have those permissions: drwxrwx--- 2 piotrlg piotrlg 22 2010-05-06 14:51 nowy3 -rwxrw---- 1 piotrlg piotrlg 10752 2010-05-06 14:51 nowy3.doc please note the lack of x bit for group file permission (for directory it works as expected). I have to use force

Il 14/05/2015 13:40, Tris Hoar ha scritto: > On 14/05/2015 10:16, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> Hi List, >> I've installed C7.1 and today configuring fstab for another disk I get >> this: >> >> UUID=d5ff30df-9e1d-4fc8-99b6-845ffa6509db / xfs >> defaults 0 0 >> UUID=052f75bc-0513-45e0-a01f-06c9a698469f /mnt/data

Hi, I added these lines to smb.conf: kernel op locks = false op locks = false strict locking = true so I could see some locks from the unix level. It worked sorta, I see the locks for big files (but not the locks I was expecting), but for little files it shows nothing: # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/mattest.doc # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/contents.doc 0 22086 W

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-02-23 06:10 ------- what does "streaming" mean? what does "output reports" mean? do you have more detailed reports? do you have debugging output? what clients are involved? what servers? does the same happen with openssh 3.0.2? does the same happen with a recent

On 11/26/2015 10:18 AM, Tris Hoar wrote: > To access RHN you will need a support agreement with Red Hat. You > could use the packages from Centos, but it would be better to just > rebuild the server if you are going down that route. long ago, far away, I successfully converted several RHEL boxes to CentOS by making a list of all the RPMs and replacing them with the centos

Hi list, i've upgraded Samba 3.0.14a to 3.0.20b (debian package) and ran into following problem: I cannot change the file-attribute (read-only, hidden, archive) from a file via the windows explorer as an ordinary user. The error "access denied" occurs. The file has following permissions on Unix: -rwxrw---- 1 root Massen 0 2005-10-28 08:17 Neu Textdatei.txt The user is

I have browsed through loads of archive material and cant seem to find anywhere where this exact issue has been posted. am using samba 2.28 set up as an NT domain, there are no problems with the general configuration. My issue is witb samba not following the permissons I have set on files in a shared directory. Purpose: set up a directory for students and teachers where students can leave files

Hi List, I've installed C7.1 and today configuring fstab for another disk I get this: UUID=d5ff30df-9e1d-4fc8-99b6-845ffa6509db / xfs defaults 0 0 UUID=052f75bc-0513-45e0-a01f-06c9a698469f /mnt/data xfs defaults 0 0 UUID=732dafbd-2f14-4dd6-8513-1504b13302f1 swap swap defaults 0 0 Fields fs_freq and fs_passno

hello, i have a question concerning the locking feature of samba (both 2.2.8 and 3.0.0) that i haven't found answered in the documentation. at this point i am not sure, whether it's a bug in samba, the client applications or simply a misunderstanding of the locking feature itself on my part - at any rate it's a pressing problem, as my clients are losing both their data as well as

On 11/4/2015 12:52 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: > I don't get this for some reason... not even sure why. ESXi's default > behaviour seems to be to allow hotplug, that does not seem to be > deactivated. I am just not sure. Wonder if this could be the Centos 7 vs 6 > - perhaps that is what I ought to test for. what virtual SCSI controller type are you using for these VM's? Mine

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Tris Hoar <trishoar at bgfl.org> wrote: > On 04/11/2015 20:59, John R Pierce wrote: > >> On 11/4/2015 12:52 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: >> >>> I don't get this for some reason... not even sure why. ESXi's default >>> behaviour seems to be to allow hotplug, that does not seem to be >>> deactivated. I am just

Op 25-11-14 om 19:08 schreef Tris Hoar: > On 25/11/2014 16:52, Johan Vermeulen wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I'm looking at setting up ds-389 on both Centos6.6 en Centos7, both >> minimal installs with >> epel repo enabled. >> >> When running yum search ds-389 on Centos7 I get only 3 packages, >> >> 389-ds-base >> 389-ds-base-devel

Hello All, I'm looking at setting up ds-389 on both Centos6.6 en Centos7, both minimal installs with epel repo enabled. When running yum search ds-389 on Centos7 I get only 3 packages, 389-ds-base 389-ds-base-devel 389-ds-base-libs On Centos6.6 I get the whole list: 389-ds.noarch : 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite 389-ds-base.x86_64 : 389 Directory Server (base)

Hi tris, ?Many thanks, I'll give the perl script a try shortly.... Best,David On Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:00 AM, Tris Hoar <trishoar at bgfl.org> wrote: On 30/03/2016 18:08, David Copperfield wrote: > Hi, >? We have tens of networks(VLANs) in data center with a central Linux DHCP server. each network has their router to do the DHCP relay. So, the DHCP server's