similar to: New package lazyData submitted to CRAN

A new release of the conf.design package has been submitted to CRAN. This is largely a "tidying up" release, with no substantial change in functionality. The one difference some users may notice is that the method functions factorize.default factorize.factor are no longer exported directly, but instead are simply registered as S3 methods in the namespace. This change should not

A new release of the conf.design package has been submitted to CRAN. This is largely a "tidying up" release, with no substantial change in functionality. The one difference some users may notice is that the method functions factorize.default factorize.factor are no longer exported directly, but instead are simply registered as S3 methods in the namespace. This change should not

Hi the list I have package foo0 with a big dataset 'myData'. In DESCRIPTION, if I use 'LazyData: no', then I get: - when I open a R session : memory used=20 908 - when I attach 'library(foo0)' : memory used=24364 - then I load the set 'data(myData)' : memory used=39 668 If I use LazyData: yes', then I get - when I open a R session : memory used=20 908

>>>>> Aaron Wells <aaronw at catalyst.net.nz> >>>>> on Fri, 24 Nov 2017 12:46:48 +1300 writes: > Hi, I think I've found a bug in R CMD INSTALL. When it tries to parse a > DESCRIPTION file with an invalid LazyData field, it errors out while > trying to print the correct error message: >> R CMD INSTALL . > *

Hi, I think I've found a bug in R CMD INSTALL. When it tries to parse a DESCRIPTION file with an invalid LazyData field, it errors out while trying to print the correct error message: > R CMD INSTALL . * installing to library ?/home/example/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.4? * installing *source* package ?samplepackage? ... ** data Error in errmsg("invalid value of ", field,

Dear developeRs, I've searched the documentation, FAQ, and mailing lists, but haven't found the answer(*) to the following: When should one specify LazyLoad, LazyData, and ZipData? And what is the default if they are left unspecified? (*)Except that 1) If the package you are writing uses the methods package, specify LazyLoad: yes, and 2) The optional ZipData field controls whether the

Hello, That is my first post here and I'd like to thanks everybody in advance. I am writing a package with some R functions and try to submit it to CRAN. After build and check the package a number of times, I am struggling with the fact that the CRAN people responsible for checking packages are replying me with some mistakes that I just do NOT get when I do the check in my computer. With the

When I run R CMD check on the survival package I invariably get a note: ... * checking for file ?survival/DESCRIPTION? ... OK * this is package ?survival? version ?3.2-6? * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE Maintainer: ?Terry M Therneau <therneau.terry at mayo.edu>? ... This is sufficient for the auto-check process to return the following failure message: Dear maintainer,

Conditional Inference Procedures in a Permutation Test Framework The `coin' package implements a general framework for conditional inference procedures, commonly known as permutation tests, theoretically derived by Strasser & Weber (1999). The conditional expectation and covariance for a broad class of multivariate linear statistics as well as the corresponding multivariate limiting

Conditional Inference Procedures in a Permutation Test Framework The `coin' package implements a general framework for conditional inference procedures, commonly known as permutation tests, theoretically derived by Strasser & Weber (1999). The conditional expectation and covariance for a broad class of multivariate linear statistics as well as the corresponding multivariate limiting

Dear useRs, `multcomp' version 0.991-1 will be shortly available from CRAN near you. Nearly all functionality contained in the package has been re-implemented from scratch. The focus of the package has been extended to general linear hypotheses in arbitrary parametric models and the most important function to check out is `glht()'. Multiple comparison of means procedures (for example

Dear useRs, `multcomp' version 0.991-1 will be shortly available from CRAN near you. Nearly all functionality contained in the package has been re-implemented from scratch. The focus of the package has been extended to general linear hypotheses in arbitrary parametric models and the most important function to check out is `glht()'. Multiple comparison of means procedures (for example

FWIW, here's a little data set I collected yesterday while working as an election judge in a precinct in Maryland: End DEM REP IND LIB OTH 8:00 40 12 7 1 0 9:00 30 7 3 0 0 10:00 35 13 6 0 0 11:00 31 10 8 0 0 12:00 23 4 2 0 0 1:00 23 5 0 0 0 2:00 20 8 1 0 0 3:00 24 5 6 0 0 4:00 15 6 4

Dear all, in GADM map there are three levels (nation, province and precinct) for each country of the world but for all of them you are never able to plot only one part of a chosen country. To be sure, I am trying to plot only one region of “Italy” and colour the different precincts in it. So far I am able to colour only the part of my interest but the programme still plot the whole country. Is

Hello, All: If I use LazyData with the Ecdat package on R-Forge, "R CMD check" reports "no visible binding for global variable 'nonEnglishNames'", where 'nonEnglishNames' is a dataset in Ecdat used as the default argument for a function. With LazyData, that NOTE disappears. However, then I get, "Warning: objects 'Hstarts',

Hi, In the DESCRIPTION file the ByteCompile and LazyLoading arguments appear to accept any value. >From the manual the field should be a "logical field". However, authors interpret this in a variety of ways: unique(tools::CRAN_package_db()$ByteCompile) # [1] NA "TRUE" "yes" "true" "Yes" "no" #

Hello, The CRAN checks for the drake package (4.1.0) fail for r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang. This happened right when crayon 1.3.4 was released, but I suspect the problem is not with crayon or drake, but with base R-devel. I cannot reproduce the error myself, but I have copied a minimal working example (MWE) below that should theoretically isolate the problem. `find_namespaced_functions()`

Hi, not sure this is a bug or just an unavoidable undesirable side-effect -- or just me that does not do the right thing. Consider the code and output below. It creates 2 packages: * pkgA * pkgB that creates a method for a generic defined in pkgA Changes in a method for the generic in pkgA (after re-installing pkgA) are not reflected in pkgB, unless pkgB is re-installed against the new

Hi, the ratetables package on CRAN contains no author/maintainer information whatsoever and I cannot remember who submitted it ... is the creator out there on this list? The DESCRIPTION file is missing (otherwise I wouldn't have problems with finding the author) ... Fritz -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read

Dear useR! an updated version of package 'vars' has been shipped to CRAN lately. Information on package 'vars': ============================== Title: VAR Modelling Version: 0.1.3 Date: 2006-07-27 Author: Bernhard Pfaff Maintainer: Bernhard Pfaff <bernhard at pfaffikus.de> Depends: R (>= 2.0.0), MASS, strucchange Saveimage: yes