similar to: MIT Kerberos and OpenSSH

Hi all and TIA for any help, I find myself in an imposed quandry. I am using cPanel on 4.11-RELEASE-p13 boxes. 99% of the system works well, but I've come across an issue with ssl. It's caused my certs to suddenly crap out and SSL connections from payment processors no longer work (making my customers a tad angry) The base system has openssl-0.9.7d and the ports are linked against

I am completely frustrated at this point. The following is not meant against you personally, but I'm the ONLY I.T. person for 100 users in 6 different offices, and I don't know what to do at this point but beg. I finally figured out what Heimdal is, and I believe is the main problem. Installed 5.2.1 on a machine. Installed krb5 from ports. Changed make.conf adding

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm wondering if/where I can get the server side component for freebsd-update. Presumably such a component would build and sign the binary patches and prepare them to be served via HTTP to the freebsd-update client. I need a system for distributing binary updates to a collection of customized FreeBSD machines, jails, and embedded systems.

Can anyone suggest a way to have a notification after a print job has completed. I currently have this as my print command: lpr -r -P%p %s; csh -c 'echo \"%J has started printing on %S\" | /usr/bin/smbclient -U %L -M %m -I %I' & It kind of does what I want, but notice that the message says that "Job has STARTED printing on Printer". This is because with this

>From 2.6.2's Makefile: install: all ... ${INSTALLCMD} ${STRIP} -m 755 rsync$(EXEEXT) ${DESTDIR}${bindir} ... install-strip: $(MAKE) STRIP='-s' install This doesn't work (at least) on OpenBSD, because install(1) there will use the value of the environment variable STRIP as the command to run for stripping the executable. Renaming the variable will take care of this. ---

Hello! I noticed that the binaries of all llvm tools contain an rpath to $OBJDIR/Release/bin. I just only learned about rpaths, but the way I understand them this would only make sense if that path would contain shared libraries, which it doesn't. Especially it makes no sense if I install the binaries and delete the build directory (where it potentially even leaves a security issue behind).

Hi, Is it possible to mount the complete SMB tree (Network Neighborhood in MS Windows) to /smb for example? I currently only know how to mount individual shares. Thanks in advance, Z

Hello all! I've readed somes docs and I found nothing about the following trouble : I can't connect to my sbmd server using the following : '\\MYRH72SMBDSERVERNAME\'. I always got a error message like : 'Share name could not be found, make sure you typed it correctly....' , but if I utilize \\10.x.x.x\ all is working fine (I don't want to access using the \\IP\

Howdie: I've been reading some old threads and still have a couple of questions about applying the AGI_BACKGROUND script inside a Conference. Perhaps someone can save me a bit of fidd'lin. Am I right in assuming that the MEETME_AGI_BACKGROUND script **WILL WORK** on SIP conferenced channels **WITHOUT** an **ACTIVE** zap channel-- AS LONG AS THERE IS A DIGIUM CARD INSTALLED IN THE

> I've run the test last night to see how long it takes, and I can > afford to cronjob it for the night. Great! > I didn't quite realize it would automatically send the report, but > it did [1] and there are a few test failure from the > Frontend{C,C++} directories. I suppose this is because I have > llvm-gcc4.0 2.1 installed, which might need to be upgraded. Is >

Hello list! Tanya Lattner wrote: > We are in desperate need of linux x86 testers (32 or 64 bit). If you > could set one up, the LLVM project would be very grateful. Right now > we have virtually no testers covering this platform. I've run the test last night to see how long it takes, and I can afford to cronjob it for the night. I didn't quite realize it would automatically

>> llvm-gcc4.0 is no longer supported, use llvm-gcc4.2. Please keep in mind >> that you need to keep llvm-gcc in sync with llvm (same revision number). > > This basically means llvm-gcc needs to be rebuild every time llvm > is built and the test run. Shouldn't this be part of > NewNightlyTest.pl then? Yes. Patches accepted ;) There is a GSOC student that is supposed

Howdie- Can anyone please confirm that the BACKGROUND application does ***NOT*** return IMMEDIATELY when called from within an AGI EXEC command? It seems that EXEC waits until DTMF or THE END OF THE AUDIO FILE to return to the AGI script. This essentially prevents repeated calls to BACKGROUND (or I assume any other asterisk dialplan application) from within an AGI, and prevents

All, We are in desperate need of linux x86 testers (32 or 64 bit). If you could set one up, the LLVM project would be very grateful. Right now we have virtually no testers covering this platform. Directions to set up a tester are here: http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#nightly These directions could be improved of course. If you have any questions, I will be happy to assist you in

Hi, im using a WinXP Pro with samba 2.2.8, i have configured samba according the the online book - Using Samba, 2ed, O'Reilly & Associates and the system is generating the following error when i try to logon: [2003/11/10 21:20:13, 3] smbd/oplock.c:init_oplocks(1214) open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket. [2003/11/10 21:20:13, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(813) bind

PLEASE HELP ME!!! For some reason, I can not change any of my shares! I just started trying to configure samba yesterday. Here is what I have: (2) Windows 98 SE Systems (1) Debian 2.2 r 3 Linux System running Samba The username on the Windows machines is "Name" and I want to be able to access a few shares on the Samba machine. So I started configuring

I am having a problem with some Windows 95 PC's . I had Samba 2.0.5 installed on a Sun system with Solaris 6, and a local network of PC's with W95 and W98, and everything was working fine. I then installed a new server with Solaris 8, and changed the IP addresses on the network, and the W98 PC was fine as was one of the W95 PC's, but 2 W95Pc's cannot see the Samba share, if I do

Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> Is >> there a specific version of llvm-gcc that is prefered for nightly >> tests? Shall I go with the latest stable one? 4.0 or 4.2? > llvm-gcc4.0 is no longer supported, use llvm-gcc4.2. Please keep in mind > that you need to keep llvm-gcc in sync with llvm (same revision number). This basically means llvm-gcc needs to be rebuild every time

On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > >> llvm-gcc4.0 is no longer supported, use llvm-gcc4.2. Please keep in mind > >> that you need to keep llvm-gcc in sync with llvm (same revision number). > > > > This basically means llvm-gcc needs to be rebuild every time llvm > > is built and the test run.

I have been using samba for a while now with great sucesses it has replaced my Windows 2000 server completely, I am using a mix of windows98, 2000 and XP with no problems. However i would like to do two things, 1) print samba veriables to a log file in a location of my choice 2) When a windows test user logs on, i would like to display a windowed dialog box showing the verious samba veriable