similar to: Identd in jail.

Hi all, Has identd been removed from the upstream release? If so what replaces it? I see an oidentd rpm on DAG, but I'm curious about what I should be using? Many Thanks Daveh

Sorry to ask this question here since it's related to IRC and not Asterisk, but I am having trouble logging into the #asterisk IRC channel on freenode and was wondering if anyone else has had this problem and solved it. So here's the situation: Whenever I try to login to the #asterisk channel I get a message like "you must be identified to login to this channel." So after doing

Hi, I use shorewall on my router (internal ip: 192.168.1.4). The router is used as a gateway for my lan. If I try to access an IRC server from any "client" (for exaples 192.168.1.1) I get the message "no identd". I tried the following in my shorewall rules config (etc/shorewall/rules), but i doesn''t work: ACCEPT net loc tcp 113

I've just realised that when a user uses ssh to connect to a machine, then sets up a port forward and uses it, the resulting connection is reported by identd as belonging to root. While I realise ident is not any kind of secure authentication, it doesn't make much sense to make it even less so by letting any user create connections reported to be made by root. The sshd should drop all

Hello. I have a lot of servers with CentOS 7 and samba 4 (classic domain controllers), differnt versions (4.4.4, 4.6.2...). I have found that changes hosts allow option are not applaying without restart smbd. I have tried: systemctl reload smbd.service killall -1 smbd pkill -HUP smbd smbcontrol smbd reload-config but client I have added does not have access. I see strange messages in system

Hi, Rowland, I have the same issue too. I can't find any useful info after I ran 'man smbcontrol', could you give us a clearer answer. Thanks. Yours Adam From: Rowland Penny via samba Date: 2018-06-20 17:40 To: samba Subject: Re: [Samba] hosts allow option is not applaying without restart smbd On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:22:36 +0700 Vladimir Eltsov via samba <samba at

Bottom posting On 6/21/2018 9:38 AM, adam_xu--- via samba wrote: > Hi, Rowland, I have the same issue too. I can't find any useful info after I ran 'man smbcontrol', could you give us a clearer answer. Thanks. > > > > Yours Adam > > From: Rowland Penny via samba > Date: 2018-06-20 17:40 > To: samba > Subject: Re: [Samba] hosts allow option is not

Hello. I have a lot of servers with CentOS 7 and samba 4 (classic domain controllers), differnt versions (4.4.4, 4.6.2...). I have found that changes hosts allow option are not applaying without restart smbd. I have tried: systemctl reload smbd.service killall -1 smbd pkill -HUP smbd smbcontrol smbd reload-config but client I have added does not have access. I see strange messages in system

On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:54:06 +0200 john doe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Bottom posting > > On 6/21/2018 9:38 AM, adam_xu--- via samba wrote: > > Hi, Rowland, I have the same issue too. I can't find any useful > > info after I ran 'man smbcontrol', could you give us a clearer > > answer. Thanks. > > > > > > >

Where can I find a patch for ext3 fs for kernel-2.4.2. Currently I'm using RH7.1 I dont want to upgrade to RH7.2!!! I just want to applay the ext3 patch for kernel-2.4.2 compile and use it. Thanks in advance! Sanat

Where can I find a patch for ext3 fs for kernel-2.4.2. Currently I'm using RH7.1 I dont want to upgrade to RH7.2!!! I just want to applay the ext3 patch for kernel-2.4.2 compile and use it. Thanks in advance! Sanat

Hello... What is the status of AutoCAD 2005 under Wine 1.1.4... Is it still need applay any patches and recompile Wine, or nothing is need for install, only winetricks??

Already fixed in CVS. See this report for the patch and applay it. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1147 ----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE stephane.purnelle@corman.be Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467 |---------+---------------------------------------------------------> | |

I have a need to have users SSH into a server where they are limited to a chroot jail (sandbox). Once they are there, they need to be able to execute 'ssh' and 'scp' to other systems. I've no problem setting up the basic chroot jail and providing basic functionality (ls, cat, less, etc). The part that is stopping me is setting it up so that that user can then 'ssh'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Jailed processes can attach to other jails Category: core Module: kernel Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Jailed processes can attach to other jails Category: core Module: kernel Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Jail rc.d script privilege escalation Category: core Module: etc_rc.d Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Jail rc.d script privilege escalation Category: core Module: etc_rc.d Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Jail rc.d script privilege escalation Category: core Module: etc_rc.d Announced:

Hi. When we don't have too many IP addresses available and we want to run for example www server inside a jail, but use the same IP address as the main system, we need to actually use an internal IP address and forward http port with firewall from external IP to jail's IP. In that way we know that if somebody breaks into out jail, he cannot run sshd server (we have keys, I know) or any