similar to: total indirect effects in structural equation modeling using lavaan

I am a new user of the function sem in package sem and lavaan for structural equation modeling 1. I don?t know what is the difference between this function and CFA function, I know that cfa for confirmatory analysis but I don?t know what is the difference between confirmatory analysis and structural equation modeling in the package lavaan. 2. I have data that I want to analyse but I have some

Hi Yves lavaan looks like a very nice package. From the tutorial introduction I see you create path diagrams for some of the models you describe. How did you do this? I don't see a function for this in the package. I know there is a path.diagram function in the sem package that uses dot to draw the diagram, but I've always found the layouts from dot somewhat strange for path diagrams

A long formula which is converted using as.character, looses its last part: ``diagonal = 1e-12)'' Shorter formula is ok though. Best, H??vard ************ Browse[2]> formula.str y ~ -1 + b1 + b2 + b3 + b4 + b5 + b6 + b7 + b8 + b9 + b10 + b11 + b12 + b13 + b14 + b15 + b16 + b17 + b18 + b19 + b20 + b21 + b22 + b23 + b24 + b25 + b26 + b27 + b28 + b29 + b30 + b31 + b32 +

Dear R-users, A new package called `lavaan' (for latent variable analysis) has been uploaded to CRAN. The current version of lavaan (0.3-1) can be used for path analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling, and growth curve modeling. More information can be found on the website: http://lavaan.org Some notable features of lavaan: - the 'lavaan model

Dear R-users, A new package called `lavaan' (for latent variable analysis) has been uploaded to CRAN. The current version of lavaan (0.3-1) can be used for path analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling, and growth curve modeling. More information can be found on the website: http://lavaan.org Some notable features of lavaan: - the 'lavaan model

> > If one compares the random effect estimates, in fact, one sees that > > they are in the correct proportion, with the expected signs. They are > > just approximately eight orders of magnitude too small. Is this a bug? > > BLUPs are essentially shrinkage estimates, where shrinkage is > determined with magnitude of variance. Lower variance more > shrinkage towards

I am fitting models to the responses to a questionnaire that has seven yes/no questions (Item). For each combination of Subject and Item, the variable Response is coded as 0 or 1. I want to include random effects for both Subject and Item. While I understand that the datasets are fairly small, and there are a lot of invariant subjects, I do not understand something that is happening here, and in

Hello! I am trying to reproduce (for a publication) analyses that I ran several months ago using lavaan, I'm not sure which version, probably 0.4-12. A sample model is given below: pathmod='mh30days.log.w2 ~ mh30days.log + joingroup + leavegroup + alwaysgroup + grp.partic.w2 + black + age + bivoc + moved.conf + local.noretired + retired + ds + ministrytime + hrswork + nomoralescore.c +

Hello R Community, I am using the Lavaan package in R 2.15.0 to analyze data collected from 1200 lakes across North America. My dataset includes 3 continuous independent variables (LOG_NTL, LOG_PTL, and LOG_SR_A_D) and 1 continuous dependent variable (BIOVOL) . I have successfully constructed structural equation models using the Lavaan package (example included below with code), but I have not

MCI A1 A2 A13 A14 A23 A24 A33 A34 Grouped together 56766 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6459 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 31233

I have been trying to use lavaan (version 0.4-7) for a simple path model, but the program seems to be computing far less degrees of freedom for my model then it should have. I have 7 variables, which should give (7)(8)/2 = 28 covariances, and hence 28 DF. The model seems to only think I have 13 DF. The code to reproduce the problem is below. Have I done something wrong, or is this something I

Hi, I recently tried to estimate a linear unconditional latent growth curve on 7 repeated measures using lavaan (most recent version): modspec=' alpha =~ 1*read_g0 + 1*read_g1 + 1*read_g2 + 1*read_g3 + 1*read_g4 + 1*read_g5 + 1*read_g6 beta =~ 0*read_g0 + 1*read_g1 + 2*read_g2 + 3*read_g3 + 4*read_g4 + 5*read_g5 + 6*read_g6 ' gmod=lavaan(modspec, data=math, meanstructure=T,

Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20120425/dafc9a68/attachment.html>

Hi Sorry for the rather long message. I am trying to use the cfa command in the lavaan package to run a CFA however I am unsure over a couple of issues. I have @25 dichotomous variables, 300 observations and an EFA on a training dataset suggests a 3 factor model. After defining the model I use the command fit.dat <- cfa(model.1, data=my.dat, std.lv = T, estimator="WLSMV",

Hello all I'm trying to run some path analysis in either sem or lavaan (preferably lavaan because I find its interface easier to use). Most of my variables are continuously distributed and fairly well-behaved but I have a single exogenous variable (sex) which is not continuously distributed. Preliminary model fitting suggests that there aren't any sex by (anything else) interactions. The

Hello, I am trying to do a multiple groups CFA in lavaan and I get the following error message: Error in cov(data.obs, use = "pairwise") : 'x' is empty I'm not sure what this message is referring to, can anyone help me? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Multiple-Groups-CFA-in-Lavaan-tp3457971p3457971.html Sent from the R help mailing

Dear R-users, Does somebody know what does the "Estimate" reported by the Lavaan model tell us? I assume this tells the relative strength of the dyadic relations. Thank you for your help! Regards, Sylvain -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Lavaan-model-tp4648004.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I've just found the lavaan package, and I really appreciate it, as it seems to succeed with models that were failing in sem::sem. I need some clarification, however, in the output, and I was hoping the list could help me. I'll go with the standard example from the help documentation, as my problem is much larger but no more complicated than that. My question is, why is there one latent

Dear R-List, (I am not sure whether this list is the right place for my question...) I have a dataframe df.cfa

Hola a todos, Estoy iniciandome en R y la verdad es que aun estoy muy muy verde.... Estoy intentando clasificar unos datos con support vector machines, pero me da fallo al usar la funcion predict. El código que uso es el siguiente: calibrate<-read.table("calibration.txt", header=TRUE) calibrate$calibration<-as.factor(calibrate$calibration)