Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[Fwd: Re: Fwd: FreeBSD hiding security stuff]"
2003 Aug 12
0
Fw: Certification (was RE: realpath(3) et al)
That /. shit is indeed VERY annoying :( (FreeBSD dead WTF!!)
But if I have to convince a customer why to choose for FreeBSD, I always use
Yahoo! as an example. They got some ridiculous traffic and that site is
ultra fast.
They always buy that :D
So for now i dont need an audit
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Devon H. O'Dell" <dodell@sitetronics.com>
2005 Mar 04
1
[Fwd: Re: FW:FreeBSD hiding security stuff]
Well, I *tried* to CC: freebsd-security... I'm forwarding this to
get around the "posting from wrong address" filter.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: FW:FreeBSD hiding security stuff
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 04:42:48 -0800
From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
To: Jonathan Weiss <tomonage2@gmx.de>
CC: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Hackers
2004 Jan 11
5
BSD-licensed IDS/IDP Software?
I seem to remember seeing somewhere (on this list/on the web -- don't
remember) that there was some ``Snort-like'' software that was available under
the BSD license. Unfortunately, I'm unable to find any information about such
software. Was I dreaming, or can anybody else jog my memory? :)
Kind regards,
Devon H. O'Dell
2003 Sep 17
2
ftp
Hi,
Could u recommend a secure ftp daemon? I want to be able to control the ports it uses.... and not to have to let all of the upper ports open.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
2012 Oct 12
0
new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd at quip.cz> wrote:
> I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about config,
> but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. And they
> are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2.
Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and
Dragonfly BSD. I wonder
2006 Apr 01
0
freebsd-security Digest, Vol 154, Issue 1
freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org wrote:
> Send freebsd-security mailing list submissions to
> freebsd-security@freebsd.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org
>
> You
2005 Oct 31
1
policies primer posted
After trying to get all the policy stuff nailed down I figured I'd save
others the trouble, so I wrote up a primer and posted it on my site at
http://www.ehsco.com/reading/20051031.html
Hoepfully that will save others some trouble
--
Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
2003 Jul 16
3
Announcing DragonFly BSD!
Announcing DragonFly BSD!
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/
Hello everyone! For the last few months I have been investigating
and then working on a new approach to the BSD kernel. This has snowballed
into a far more ambitious project which is now ready for wider
participation.
It is the intent of this project to take over development of the 4.x tree,
to move kernel
2005 Jun 22
0
DragonFly BSD icecast HOWTO
Dear icecast users and developers,
Please note, I have created a HOWTO that discusses how to install and configure
icecast and ices2 to play a playlist of oggs on a DragonFly BSD machine. You
can review it by following the link below. Feel free to give me any feedback
you feel is necessary.
Also, please CC me on replies because I am not on the list.
Keep up the good work!
Thanks,
Adrian
2015 Nov 04
3
Nouveau for FreeBSD
On 04/11/15 11:58, Pierre Moreau wrote:
> Wasn't there some work being done by François Tigeot or Jean-Sébastien Pédron
> to port Nouveau to DragonFlyBSD/FreeBSD? Or at least they were talking about porting it
> at XDC 2014, no idea what the current status is.
From what they said, they never really cared about nvidia because
nvidia provides a binary driver that works, unlike intel
2014 Sep 25
7
Does dovecot work OK on *BSD?
Hi all,
I have a dovecot server on my Debian Wheezy desktop computer. My days
with Debian are limited, and I'm investigating several 'BSD's:
OpenBSD
FreeBSD
PCBSD
NetBSD
DragonflyBSD
etc
Is there any reason Dovecot wouldn't work on any of those? Does anyone
know if those OS's have packages for Dovecot, or do I need to compile
it myself?
Thanks,
SteveT
Steve Litt
2004 Jan 09
0
Security Officer-supported branches update
Hello Everyone,
The branches supported by the FreeBSD Security Officer have been
updated to reflect recent EoL (end-of-life) events. The new list is
below (and should appear at <URL: http://www.freebsd.org/security/ >
soon). FreeBSD 4.7 has `expired', but I have extended the EoL date
for FreeBSD 5.1.
If you are running FreeBSD 4.7 or older and you wish to be certain to
get critical
2005 Oct 31
1
More on freebsd-update (WAS: Is the server portion of freebsd-update open source?)
> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 07:34:28 -0700
> From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
> Subject: Re: Is the server portion of freebsd-update open source?
> To: markzero <mark@darklogik.org>
> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <43638874.2020004@freebsd.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> markzero wrote:
> > No this
2006 Apr 17
0
[LLVMdev] OpenBSD. (Was: 1.7 Pre-Release Ready for Testing)
I just added __OpenBSD__ everywhere __FreeBSD__ was being tested (there
were about a dozen places). I suspect we'll have to add one for NetBSD
also one day (even DragonflyBSD?). INT8_MAX and friends ought to be
declared by <stdint.h>. It is on FreeBSD.
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>Hi again,
>
>I wrote:
>
>
>>>I would like to test but the I modigied the
2005 Jul 14
1
OpenSSH PAM "thread" buglet
Hi all,
the attached patch ensure that only one side of the authentication
socketpair stays open on both sides. This should make the code
more robust by detecting the dead of the process on the other side.
This applies to the non-pthread case only.
Joerg
-------------- next part --------------
Index: auth-pam.c
===================================================================
RCS file:
2015 Nov 04
0
Nouveau for FreeBSD
Wasn't there some work being done by François Tigeot or Jean-Sébastien Pédron
to port Nouveau to DragonFlyBSD/FreeBSD? Or at least they were talking about porting it
at XDC 2014, no idea what the current status is.
Pierre
PS: Looking at François' slides from this year XDC, it seems there isn't much
progress about it.
On 10:44 AM - Nov 04 2015, Martin Peres wrote:
>
>
>
2015 Nov 05
0
Nouveau for FreeBSD
On 05/11/15 11:42, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> Martin Peres wrote:
>> On 04/11/15 11:58, Pierre Moreau wrote:
>>> Wasn't there some work being done by François Tigeot or Jean-Sébastien
>>> Pédron
>>> to port Nouveau to DragonFlyBSD/FreeBSD? Or at least they were talking
>>> about porting it
>>> at XDC 2014, no idea what the current status is.
2015 Nov 05
0
Nouveau for FreeBSD
Martin Peres wrote:
> On 04/11/15 11:58, Pierre Moreau wrote:
>> Wasn't there some work being done by François Tigeot or Jean-Sébastien
>> Pédron
>> to port Nouveau to DragonFlyBSD/FreeBSD? Or at least they were talking
>> about porting it
>> at XDC 2014, no idea what the current status is.
>
> From what they said, they never really cared about nvidia
2007 Dec 10
0
Error: session setup failed: Call returned zero bytes (EOF)
Hello,
I've just upgraded to samba-3.0.26a on my BSD machine. The older
version (3.0.22) was working right, but this version is giving me
problems. My
server is configureg with a LDAP server. When I do, for example, a
smbclient -L<server>, it gives me this output:
---
Domain=[GALAXIE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.26a]
Sharename Type Comment
---------
2018 Jan 03
0
Status of speexdsp?
Hello everyone,
while I've been a user of both Vorbis and Speex since about 2005, this
is the first time I write to the dev mailing list. I created ports for
both SpeexDSP and Speex for Ravenports and have a question regarding
the status of SpeexDSP.
Ravenports is a new universal package building system for *nix systems
that supports Linux, FreeBSD, DragonflyBSD and Solaris (with