similar to: LDAP users/groups not showing up with nis, pam, & ldap

I am installing smb 3.5 on a CentOS 6.2 host using smbldap-tools. I've previously installed a similar configuration on RHEL4 using smb 3.0 but CentOS now uses nss-pam-ldapd and nslcd instead of nss_ldap, so the configurations cannot be moved straight across. When I do a listing of a share directory that should have user and group ownership determined by LDAP, I get the uidNumbers and

  @import url( C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\scrollbar.css ); Hi List,   OS: centos5.3 x86_64 OpenLDAP is installed using yum.   I find that when all the ldap servers are down and offline, the operations on the client is slow. When I try to do `ls` on the directories on the client as root, it waits there for some

On 05/09/2015 01:24 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > Is it normal to have pam_unix and pam_sss twice for each each section? No. See my previous message. I think it's the result of copying portions of SuSE configurations.

one more thing: firewalld service and selinux are deactivated. On 05/11/2015 07:06 PM, Ulrich Hiller wrote: > Hmmm...., i have made now a complete new install but the problem > persists: ldap authentication works, but the host attribute is ignored. > > I have installed CentOS7 64bit with KDE. > I did not do any 'yum update' or install of extra packages so far. > >

Hello, Sometime when we receive a spam or virus that is detected as it, mailer daemon send a reply to the sender to inform that the message is a spam or content viruses. The problem is that the sender of the spam as something like voicemail at ourdomain.fr ( the user voicemail doesn't exist in our database ) And sometimes dovecot create the directory and store the reply 's mail...

Hi Louis, answers are inline ... On 03/24/2015 03:48 PM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Realm is advices to use UPPERCASE.. not obligated. ( but very advices yes ) I changed the config to uppercase and rebooted, no change in the logfiles. > > check the following outputs and post them back in the list ( if needed anonymized ) > > hostname -i 192.168.1.235 > hostname -s the-ad-hostname

Hello, I've been trying to figure this out for some time and can't quite nail it down, despite searching the internet, and a couple of samba books. Here goes: I'm running "Version 3.4.3-3.3.1-2341-SUSE-SL11.2" of Samba on OpenSUSE 11.2. Here are some relevant excerpts from my smb.conf file: [global] ... security = ADS ... winbind separator = + ... log level = 2 ...

On 28.3.2019 22.34, Robert Kudyba via dovecot wrote: >>>>> Set >>>>> >>>>> ssl_client_ca_file=/path/to/cacert.pem to validate the certificate? >>>> >>>> Can this be the Lets Encrypt cert that we already have? In other >>>> words we have: >>>> ssl_cert = </etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem

I tried to synchronize the sysvol folders, on two dcs. Something went wrong since yesterday we have replication problems: One machine shows this, while the other one is happy. samba-tool drs showrepl ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=ourdomain,DC=com Default-First-Site-Name\DC03 via RPC DSA object GUID: af610e1a-9e3b-4cdd-a36b-c296d77a9479 Last attempt @

thanks for your input. Bill: deliver is just a symlink to dovecot-lda Stephan: I don't know, and and it even does not work when I use deliver -f "postmaster at ourdomain.internal" - I get the same error message. A part of the mail I got when using 2.2.23: Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON> Delivered-To: user1 at ourdomain.internal Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])

This is still happening after a reboot, Fedora 28. Restarting dovecot fixes the problem. Does anyone know if it could be related to this bug report? *https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=103401#c130 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=103401#c130> * and suggested work around to add ports to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports? Nov 8 12:21:41 ourdomain dovecot[1386]:

Hi all, Ok, been wanting to do this for a while, and I after the Heartbleed fiasco, the boss finally agreed to let me buy some real certs... Until now, we've been using self-signed certs with the following dovecot config: ssl = required ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/ourCerts/imap.pem ssl_key = </etc/ssl/ourCerts/imap_key.pem Now, I've created new keys/certs and the CSR, got the new

>What are you thinking to transfer the zones to ? I try to explain, why I asked the question. Now we have NT4 style Samba domain, with ldap backend, and Bind. We have two sites, they are connected through VPN. On the servers, Bind configured as master-slave. On every site, there is a master, for their own domain, and they are each others' slave. As I know, this is zone transfer. I want to

We're using quite successfully a samba 4.1 AD setup authenticating user. We have on an unregular basis mails that can't be delivered because dovecot-pam fails to verify the credentials. I'm trying to debug this and set the loglevel up to 3. I can see an error message being spammed in the log files and can't figure out what causes this. I expect a configuration error somewhere

when you read. : http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg111972.html says: > >That output > ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure >is usually only seen when the internal DNS server is running. >It's a glitch, which can be ignored atm (all dyn. updates are done OK). > so if you dont want to see that error, switch to bind9_DLZ. Greetz, Louis

Hello, I am currently testing the upgrade from our dovecot v2.2.23 to 2.3.0. I have a strange problem with lda. We use bounce mails for internal users if they try to send virus/spammails. The exact same config works with 2.2.23, but not with 2.3.0. The relevant postfix/master.cf part: dovecot unix - n n - - pipe flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail

Ady, I had not previously tried three slashes, but have now. No difference unfortunately. I've also tried using the web server on the same machine as the PXE server and using 'http://127.0.0.1/Software/Util1.iso' as the URL, again to no avail. It appears not to be able to connect to anything via http or https. Presumably it uses network settings (such as the gateway) provided by the

Hi, All! I Have Samba (3.5.6) domain witch have trust relations with ADS (Named TEST) Win2008 (2008 domain mode) On PDC all working very good. I have also Domain Member server in my samba Domain. When i trying type wbinfo -u, or getent passwd on samba PDC (Named BINKLG) I see all, including ADS users. When I trying do it on Domain Member Server I don't see users from ADS Is it possible to

Hello, I am running Debian testing x64 and have manually installed the 6.03pre17 deb packages for extlinux, pxelinux, syslinux, syslinux-common, syslinux-stuff and syslinux-utils. I have a working tftpd-hpa 5.2-18 PXE system and can boot PCs to it. All .c32 binaries, gpxelinux.0 and memdisk are from the Debian packages and everything works except for http/https sources of ISOs. I have tried both

Hi, I set up Samba DCs for two sites. The first site is for example domain.ourdomain.com, the second is site2.ourdomain.com. On the first site, there will be 2 DCs, and one fileserver, on the second site there will be one DC, and it will act as fileserver too. Is it true that Samba's internal dns server won't good for that, and I need Bind, because of Bind's zone transfer feature?