similar to: New DNS server up and running

My old Centos 5.5 servers had a /root/.forward to send things like logwatch to this email account. It did not take any special configuration in sendmail for this to work. Now Centos 6.3 is using postfix (as we well know, and generally I am happy for this) and I have set up the /root/.forward as always, but it seems like postfix is ignoring it. I have restarted postfix with no difference in

When I try to burn anything to cd, I get a message to insert a CD large enough for my file (normally an ISO image). Doesn't matter if the iso image is a 600Mb Centos ISO or a 48Mb DSL ISO. Same warning. My CD-Rs are Memorex 700MB/80min 52x disks that work just fine on XP systems. So what am I missing configuration-wise?

Continuing to 'clean up' my new server by reviewing logged messages. Researching a common one: Feb 26 07:30:29 onlo named[19336]: error (unexpected RCODE SERVFAIL) resolving 'foo.com/MX/IN': 1.2.3.4#53 I get the drift that my server has been directed to a 'lame server' and logs that fact. Supposedly I am to lookup the SOA record and contact the admin to fix this.

My DNS server has been running Centos for some time. I am in the process of upgrading it to Centos 5.5 (long overdue, I know). Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well, but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND 9.3.6 and a thread on the BIND list recommends against running a DNSSEC master zone on anything less than 9.6 and you really should be on 9.7. The thread

Hi, I just installed CentOS 7 on a public server. I'd like to setup BIND as a primary DNS server for a few domains. Until now, all my public machines were running Slackware Linux, and setting up BIND on a Slackware machine is relatively easy. In its out of the box configuration, it has a bone-headed caching nameserver role, which is quite easy to expand to a primary nameserver. Here's my

On 6/10/2017 9:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of > these over a RaspberryPI: > > Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over on > the Centos-arm list. > Sata interface. What are you going to run your stuff on? A slow SD > card or a slow USB drive? I use Rasbian on my pi's.

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:03:39 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 08/27/2015 08:45 PM, Jim Seymour wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:00:28 -0400 > > Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > >> Ah, LDAP is included within Samba, I find. Don't install provided > >> one... [snip] > > >

On 4/12/2017 7:25 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I am writing my howto on BIND for Centos7. Mine is running on > Centos7-arm. You can see some of the basics I have done at: > > file:///home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homepage/Centos7-armv7.html noone else can see your local file system -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

Le 13/04/2017 ? 04:25, Robert Moskowitz a ?crit : > I am writing my howto on BIND for Centos7. Mine is running on > Centos7-arm. You can see some of the basics I have done at: > > file:///home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homepage/Centos7-armv7.html > > I have a caveat I learned with dealing with SELinux and BIND there. You sent a link to a local file (file://) so unfortunately I

On 09/10/15, C Linus Hicks wrote: On 09/10/15, Robert Moskowitz wrote: ---------------- Quoted text ------------------------ Try this: rsync -ah --stats 192.168.192.2:/root/samba.PDC/ /home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homebase/new/root/ --------------------- End Quote ---------------------------------- Sorry, I was too fast, not paying attention, you want this I believe: rsync -ah --stats root at

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 22:50:47 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > That will use the default port on the remote host, you can override > > that without specifying the -e if required using -p <port>. > > > $ rsync -ah --stats --delete -p 613 root at 192.168.129.2:/etc/dhcp/ > /home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homebase/new/dhcp > Unexpected remote arg: root at

http://www.realvnc.com/products/enterprise/4.1/ipv6.html IPv6 support in VNC Server E4.1.7/P4.1.2 VNC Server E4.1.7 & P4.1.2 are fully IPv6-aware, but is shipped with IPv6 support disabled by default, for security reasons. IPv6 can be enabled by setting "InTransports=IPv6,IPv4" (the default being IPv4 only), either on the command-line when starting vncserver under Unix Ok.

I don't know if I really like this background though it is kind of neat. Where do I find the app to change this?

I don't know if I really like this background though it is kind of neat. Where do I find the app to change this?

On 28/05/17 23:56, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 28.05.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: >> >> >> >> On 05/28/2017 04:24 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>> In article <792718e8-f403-1dea-367d-977b157af82c at htt-consult.com>, >>> Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >>>> On 05/26/2017

On 05/26/2017 08:35 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 27.05.2017 um 01:09 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: >> >> I am use to low random entropy on my arm boards, not an intel. >> >> On my Lenovo x120e, >> >> cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail >> >> reports 3190 bits of entropy. >> >> On my armv7 with

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 05:30:53PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Letsencrypt is a very important development, but it has (IMHO) a shaking > foundation.? I would not build a production system around it.? But then I > have lived in aspects of PKI since '95... I presume you meant "shaky foundation"? If so, would you care to elaborate? John -- Many people,

So I have learned that Postfix should delay until Chronyd has moved the system time from 0 to current. What other services need to be delayed? Apache? Bind? Of course if this is a nameserver, Chronyd will probably not be able to resolve the NTP server addresses until Bind is running! thanks

I did chmod -R 777 /var/lib/dovecot and it worked. I just need to figure out what the correct setting are. Thanks everyone //Ger ----------------original message----------------- From:Ger Hooton Scoil Chro? ?osa Blarney [ghooton at scins.ie ] To:Robert Moskowitz [rgm at htt-consult.com ], chaouche yacine [yacinechaouche at yahoo.com ], dovecot at dovecot.org Date:Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:05:17

I am building a new server. It will be a temporary firewall of sorts. I am well into the config, made a lot of changes; almost ready to set it up in the target networks, but now.... The system hangs trying to start sendmail. I was thinking hard about disabling sendmail, but thought I needed it for internal functions, so did not. yet. So is there someway to get the system working so I can