similar to: Perl master site changed to tobez.org?

I was doing some regression testing in 5.5: Specifically testing booting up a 'virgin' hard disk from a clean install. I was testing what happened if the 300 second timeout happened vs hitting <return> for 'fast+insecure' startup and punching in a bunch of random garbage. I found that for some reason, on a 2.4Ghz Celeron, the 'sysctl -a' and 'date' seeding

I was looking at the Sparc 64 4.7 or 4.8 port, wondering if its in any state to put on my Solaris v100. Just need the basics, eide, network, kbm,mouse, graphics (x). A bonus would be support for the lom (light out management) features and the flash card. Reason for change is I HOPE that the math (ssl) performance is better on FBSD, as well as I am just tired of keeping track of

Attempted to install dlint port. Only distribution site is www.domtools.com Email to 'content@domtools.com' and pab@domtools.com bounces (can't relay) Phone number missing on whois record. Fetch of tarball fails checksum (it delivers a generic 'web hosted search engine that just hijacked someone's domain' web page. Maybe domtools didn't renew? New web company

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-03:14.arp Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: denial of service due to ARP resource starvation Category: core Module: sys Announced:

I got some weird mail back, claiming that my e-mail was blocked, w/o indicating what server was blocked, after the mail appeared in the mailing list. Is this some BS shakedown? I use postfix on a DSL line forwarding to earthlink, this is hardly something that should be rare in the BSD world... the mail appeared to come from a web mail server and the first link has the following lovely text:

I will be updating the MIT krb5 port to krb5-1.3.2 this weekend. Unfortunately crypto-publish.org does not distribute the new source yet. Traditionally I disabled support for fetch from crytpo-publish.org until they updated their website with the latest krb5 sources, requiring the port to fetch the source from MIT in all cases. This time will be different, that is unless of course someone

On 09/17/14 22:31, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Sep 12, 2014, at 5:15 PM, Stan Gammons <sg063015 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 09/11/14 22:34, Charles Lepple wrote: >>> On Sep 11, 2014, at 11:04 PM, Stan Gammons <sg063015 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I see a libusb_get_interrupt message in the log. Could that be the problem? >>> Yes, it

I'm trying to run Wine 0.9.20 under OS X x86 and I'm getting nothing but "Bus Error" when I run any win32 program via Wine. Here is some relevant environment info: OS: Mac OS X 10.4.7 Xcode: Xcode 2.4 X11: XFree86 Version 4.4.0 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600) gcc -v: Using built-in specs. Target: i686-apple-darwin8 Configured with:

This was in bugtraq, and hasn't shown up in portaudit yet so I thought I would send it and the fix to you. I submitted a pr for a patch as well. (but for some reason, ir bounced) Problem #1: Clamav 87 has been found to have a security vulnerability that could lead to remote code execution Problem #2 patch patch-clamav-milter_clamav-milter.c won't

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 05:52:33PM +0200, steven mestdagh wrote: > please make it install the docs under share/doc/libtheora. Thank you. Updated patch below. A copy of this email goes to the list of theora. The following patch for the port of libtheora-alpha6 for OpenBSD includes (among other things): * a patch for examples/Makefile.in that doesn't link player_example since it

Hello, It appears that the FreeBSD port of Samba 3.0.x may be falling behind. The port maintainter does not use Winbind and thus has not kept up with the development of it. 3.0.1 will very shortly be ported to FreeBSD, currently it is still at 3.0.0. I know there have been some recent changes to Samba that help FreeBSD out, and I wanted to make sure that the port of Samba 3.0.x on FreeBSD stays

Hi Colin! I would like to know, that these following "vulnerabilities" does affect FreeBSD's reliability? If the answer is "yes", what version of FreeBSD affected, when will be fixed, etc. http://projects.info-pull.com/moab/MOAB-12-01-2007.html http://projects.info-pull.com/moab/MOAB-10-01-2007.html Thank you! -- kobi

Apparently rsync breaks on FreeBSD if you turn off -O2 (which is the default.) The breakage is apparently inside zlib. You'd have to think it was a compiler bug, but perhaps not. I haven't tried to reproduce it yet. -- Martin ----- Forwarded message from grog@FreeBSD.org ----- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 23:14:46 -0700 (PDT) From: <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: mbp@samba.org Subject: PR

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Eygene Ryabinkin >Organization: Code Labs >Confidential: no >Synopsis: [patch] [vuxml] net/wireshark: fix DoS in SMTP dissector >Severity: serious >Priority: high >Category: ports >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE i386 >Description: Today the DoS

Good morning in the Lord Regarding the port of libtheora1.1beta3 for OpenBSD for amd64 and the problem I described at: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora/2009-August/002640.html Attached is a patch for libtheora/patches/patch-lib_x86_mmxencfrag_c I can play videos with it. ?Does it work for you? Best regards -- Dios, gracias por tu amor infinito.

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> > >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski > >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer

Hi, I am using IPFW on FreeBSD 4.11 I am facing two problems: - SSH sessions timeout after a while - When I run "/sbin/ipfw -q -f flush" in the rules script all connection get reset (and I am thrown out of the box). Is this standard functioning of ipfw or do I need to change any configuration? Thanks, Siddhartha

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > > On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 11.01.2013, at 07:36, ????????? (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > > >

On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: >> >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer >>> <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 11.01.2013, at

On 1/11/2013 3:59 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: >> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >>>> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: