similar to: routing problem?

Hi All, My Samba server/firewall has three (two real, one virtual) network cards: eth0.5: connects to a terminal server eth0: internal network with about 10 XP workstations eth1: the Internet Samba is set to talk to only 12.0.0.1, eth0.5 and eth0. I have my firewall iptables rules set so that users on eth0.5 can only use the samba server on my server. They can not share with any other user on

# Set everything else to deny all other network access (debug=1): $tbls -A dsl-for -j LOG --log-level $debug --log-prefix "dsl-for Everything Else " $tbls -A dsl-for -j DROP packets originating on my VLAN (eth0.5) destined for the Internet get logged with their IN/SRC, OUT/DST logged backwards. For instance, this is Cobian Backup (http://www.cobian.se/cobianbackup.htm) on my Windows

Hi I have problems with shaping traffic running through a VLAN. I have done the following set up: I have a linux box a gateway. I wish to use VLAN on the internal interface (eth0). eth1 is connected to the internet. I will like to be able to shape the dowstream traffic. I have set up the followingon the gateway: vconfig add eth0 10 tc qdisc add dev eth0.10 parent root handle 1: htb default 2

1. Link state monitoring added. We discovered the following problem with the existing bridge code. The code doesn't monitor the link state of the interfaces. When using two cisco switches with two Linux bridging firewalls the following problem exists. When the Cisco switch that has the blocking (stp) Linux bridge attached dies, the Linux bridge no longer receives stp packets and changes

Hello What I''m looking for is how to configure the Linux QoS module to do global rate limitation for two (or more) 802.1q pseudo network devices. I naturally suppose there is a possibility with IFB. I don''t want to use IMQ because it''s not integrated to my kernel v2.6.21.1 and I didn''t find IMQ patches for it nor for the iptables package I use (v1.3.7).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I''ve a problem on the broadcast it is adding some additional route to the router which caused me some problem... Below is my /etc/shorewall/interface swtmng1 eth0.1 202.73.10.127 norfc1918 apmng1 eth0.10 202.73.8.7 norfc1918 dist1 eth0.1000 202.73.11.255 norfc1918,nobogons idc1 eth2.50

Hi, I've set up a virtual machine and plugged it into a bridge on the host. When i configure an ip for eth0 in the guest i can ping other machines fine but when I add an interface eth0.10 in the guest and add an ip pings using this interface do not work. When using tcpdump in vnet0 on the host I can see the icmp packets when I ping using eth0 in the guest but not when I use the eth0.10

Hi all. What is the canonical way of getting xen to fully work with 802.1q (vlans) ? After (re)searching i found many ways but so far none is working. platform is gentoo (x86/32) and netwerk card a tg3. xen is v3. my config is as follows ... eth0 is simply up (with no ip) and i created several eth0.x interfaces corresponding to several vlans. eth0.10 is de ''default'' vlan

Hi all, I''m sure I''m soing something wrong here. I am trying to set up a rate limit inside another rate limit. eg. I have a 512K rate limit on a particular VLAN. I am using an IFB so that packets passing through the bridge are counted at each port.(ie the throughput is limited to 512K, not just the traffic in one direction.) This part works OK, but I also want to limit a

Hi, I'm having trouble getting networking to work and I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. The network interface of the host is connected to a switch-port that is configured as trunk and allows tagged traffic for vlan id 10. The host itself has the interfaces eth1.10 and eth1 defined. eth1.10 is configured with the primary ip address of the host system and eth1 is slave of the bridge

I think it should be sufficient to do as following: - create and test the vlans as normal (i think you already did this) - try to create the bridge as follows (for the first try without starting xend): # network-bridge start netdev=vlan100 bridge=xenbr0 at least this was working on my debian testing installation but i have a problem now with incorrect tcp checksums in dom0 or domU. See my

Hello guys, Sorry to bothering you. I had a small network with one ISP and firewall. eth1 -> Is connected to my ISP eth0 + eth0.1 , eth0.2 and etc are my local networks. All my network accesses internet via eth1. My routing table looks like the following : 213.194.242.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 10.123.20.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0

Hi, I ran into a Problem when using alias interfaces with vlans on a centos 5 box. When I define such an interface and do a "service network restart" the alias interface doesn't get started. Starting it manually works fine. Also after changing DEVICE=eth0.10:0 to DEVICE=eth0:0 in the config file the interface is started after a network restart. Does anyone have an idea what the

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625 Summary: IN/SRC, OUT/DST backwards in LOG when used with a VLAN Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P4 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy:

Running shorewall 3.0.6, Linux 2.6.16, iptables 1.3.0. This firewall has eth1 facing the DMZ and eth0 is a 802.1q trunk with 6 VLANs and zones on it. I would like to allow one subnet living out beyond the DMZ to have access to all zones on this firewall. It seemed that creating a zone would allow for this to be done cleanly via a line in the policy file. I defined this special subnet as the

[-=X.L.O.R.D=-] wrote: > 1guys, > I think it can be done via power management feature if PC idle a period of time, sleep it. Access is exclusively via RDP-sessions. I don?t know if I can get a VM to hibernate when idle and to wake up when someone tries to connect; and delying logins as mmight occur when the VM needs to wake up first is not an option. Besides, internet access would not be

I couldn''t find anyone who had actually made it work via google so I guess I''ll ask here. My setup is a VPN point to point link. The VPN is a modified version of Openvpn where I''m using zlib compression to improve the compression a bit. The goal is to shape traffic coming from a routing server through the vpn to the endpoint of the vpn and in such a way maximize the

This is offtopic, but related to what you’ve told me so far. I’m having some trouble getting the VNC connection to work. Technically, the “connection” is working fine, but the Windows TightVNC Viewer comes up with an error dialog saying this: Xsession: unable to start X session --- no "/home/.../.xsession" file, no "/home/.../.Xsession" file, no session managers, no window

Hello, can anybody help me how to configure vlans? There are vlans: vlan2 vlan3 vlan30 Server has one nic - eth0. vlan2 should be dom0 eth0(peth0) for management Each vlan3 and vlan30 should be has its own bridge. How to make it? Br Peter _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I’m confused. You’re asking if I’m able to connect with VNC in response to my comment that I’m unable to connect with VNC? What I see when I open the viewer on the port is a window titled “<username> X desktop”, with a grey background, an “X” cursor, and an error dialog (with an “okay” prompt) saying what I described before. Ctrl-Alt-F1 and similar keys do nothing. From: Jeff Tchang