Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches similar to: "Re: OT: Suggestions for RAID HW for 2 SATA drives in"
2007 Sep 09
0
Re: OT: Suggestions for RAID HW for 2 SATA drives in
On 04 September 2007, Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov>
wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:12:34 -0400
> From: Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov>
<snip>
> No new partition is needed. VMware virtual disks are created as files
> within the hosts OS. That's not a lot of free space to play with, but
> enough to
2007 Sep 01
0
Re: OT: Suggestions for RAID HW for 2 SATA drives in
On 31 August 2007, Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov> wrote:
> Message: 21
<snip>
> As discussed recently on-list, VMware CPU requirements to support
> virtualization are not nearly so rigorous as for Xen. You are
> probably OK with VMware on most any relatively modern x86 or x86_64
> CPU.
>
2007 Aug 31
1
Re: OT: Suggestions for RAID HW for 2 SATA drives in
On 30 August 2007, Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com> wrote:
> Message: 57
<snip>
> And, learning how to remove/replace
> a defective drive is something I should do.
> VMWare is a good way to experiment with things like that.
Scott: Thank you for that idea! I don't think any of the boxes in our
house have boards that permit virtualization (sp?), but possibly the
2007 Sep 12
0
Re: [CentOS-devel] Areca RAID drivers
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 23:32 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Phil Schaffner wrote:
> > Karanbir provided driver disk images and indicated that kmod drivers
> > would be in CentOS-5 Extras, but apparently these never materialized.
> > The only src.rpm I could turn up was the last link above, and I did get
> > CentOS-5 x86_64 kmod-style drivers to build from
2007 Aug 28
2
Blackberry Bounces [was Fwd: Delivery Status Notification(Failure)]
Is everyone else posting to this list getting one of these after
each-and-every post? If so, someone please un-subscribe this person:
rsivak at tmo.blackberry.net
Phil
-------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: postmaster at tmo.blackberry.net
> To: Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification(Failure)
> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:32:02 GMT
>
> Your
2009 Apr 17
1
Hijacking threads
From: "Phil Schaffner" <P.R.Schaffner at IEEE.org>
>
> Ed,
>
> I'm sure your contribution would be much appreciated, but please do not
> hijack threads by doing a Reply and changing the subject. Your post
> shows up embedded in the thread due to mail headers that preserve the
> context and messes up threaded mail readers that many people use.
> Please
2007 Aug 31
0
Re: CentOS Digest, Vol 31, Issue 31
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner at NASA.gov>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:57:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NFS Question and answers
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 18:38 +0530, Rohit Rai wrote:
> HI! Friends,
>
> in followup to my last article regarding my experiences with setting
> up
2011 Mar 31
1
CentOS Digest, Vol 74, Issue 31
thanks for the reply, Phil
It would, were udev not inserting USB and/or eSATA drives at /dev/sdb1
and/or /dev/sdc1 and exposing the array to the udev rule intended to
handle only removable devices (at sdc or sdd). The array then mounts
unpredictably in /media/xxx-sdc1 or sdd1 - not what is wanted - depend
on how many removable devices are plugged at the time of rebooting. Of
course, a single
2011 Apr 22
0
QT and oprofile on Centos Linux 5.5
Philip Schaffner, Thank you for your reply. I guess we will have to wait until Centos 6 arrives to get a working QT. Did you see Nicolas Thierry-Mieg's response regarding yum install oprofile-gui. We were able to install oprofile-guii.i386 0:0.9.4-15.el5.centos and oprofile.i386 0.0.9.4.15.el.5.centos. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was
2017 Jul 17
0
Power Down ESXi before SAN
On Sun, 16 Jul 2017, Mike Schaffner wrote:
> I have 2 APC UPS systems, one is connected to my ESXi host and the other
> to my FreeNAS.?? The battery for the FreeNAS will run out before the
> battery for the ESXi, so I need ESXi to shutdown first.?? If I wait
> until BatteryLow on ESXI, it will be too late as FreeNAS will have
> already shutdown.?? How can I change the
2009 Sep 16
0
Skype Wiki procedure is broken.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype
Links to the Skype RPM are broken. Inserted a warning on the page.
Phil
--
Philip R. Schaffner, RTD/ESB Phone: (757)864-1809
NASA/Langley Research Center, MS 473 FAX: (757)864-7891
8 North Dryden Street, B1299, Room 109 WWW:
Hampton, VA 23681-2199 http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/aero/avsafe/iifd/
2005 Aug 05
0
US Federal Government to require MSIE for copyrightpreregistration
Doesn't this constitute government sponsorship of a religon?
-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
Behalf Of Phil Schaffner
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 7:36 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] US Federal Government to require MSIE for
copyrightpreregistration
The following OT thread from fedora-list may be of some
2007 Nov 19
1
Dual boot box: WinXP & CentOS 5: Impossible torestoreWinXP?
I wouldn't necessarily wipe the whole HD, just the windows partition.
You could also use Xen in CentOS 5 for your Windows virtualization. I'd wait for 5.1 though which will be more refined then version 5.
I've been thinking of setting up a Xen machine of my own with a Windows HVM and a couple of Linux PVMs with their GUIs/consoles pinned to different virtual consoles. It has always
2006 Feb 11
2
FW: Unable to update
Thanks for the quick response!
Here is my yum.repos.d ->
[base]
name=CentOS-$releasever - Base
baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-centos4
#released updates
[update]
name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates
baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/updates/$basearch/
gpgcheck=1
2007 Apr 12
1
Release for CentOS-5 i386 and x86_64
We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5 for
the i386 and x86_64 Architectures.
CentOS-5 is based on the upstream release 5, and includes packages from
all variants including Server and Client. All upstream repositories have
been combined into one, to make it easier for end users to work with.
And the option to further enable external repositories at install time
is
2007 Apr 12
1
Release for CentOS-5 i386 and x86_64
We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5 for
the i386 and x86_64 Architectures.
CentOS-5 is based on the upstream release 5, and includes packages from
all variants including Server and Client. All upstream repositories have
been combined into one, to make it easier for end users to work with.
And the option to further enable external repositories at install time
is
2007 Apr 13
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 26, Issue 4
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When