similar to: tdb2 idmap script issue

Will I really HAVE to use the idmap backends AD or RID? I was planning to use TDB2 with a script which I've already written: [root at fs3 samba]# ./idmap.sh IDTOSID UID 1301 SID:S-1-5-21-1632654815-303659134-1628659390-1950 [root at fs3 samba]# ./idmap.sh IDTOSID GID 198 SID:S-1-5-21-1632654815-303659134-1628659390-3247 [root at fs3 samba]# ./idmap.sh SIDTOID

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The tdb2 backend for idmap is broken in Ubuntu and presumably debian. As reported here https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789097 Careful how you read it, the quoted patch is the source of the bug, NOT the fix. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

Am Samstag, 3. März 2018, 17:27:56 CET schrieb Norman Gaywood via samba: > On 2 March 2018 at 20:37, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> > wrote: > > Your Samba machine can be a Unix active directory domain member or > > it > > can be a member of an NT4-style domain that uses ldap, it cannot be > > both. > > It can also authenticate

On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 17:27:56 +1100 Norman Gaywood <ngaywood at une.edu.au> wrote: > On 2 March 2018 at 20:37, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Your Samba machine can be a Unix active directory domain member or > > it can be a member of an NT4-style domain that uses ldap, it cannot > > be both. > > It can also

On 2 March 2018 at 20:37, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Your Samba machine can be a Unix active directory domain member or it > can be a member of an NT4-style domain that uses ldap, it cannot be > both. > It can also authenticate from an ldap server on another machine, in > this case, it wouldn't be a domain member. > It should be

Hi I'm encountering an error with some of my Windows clients when using CTDB and samba to access a GPFS hosted share. We see the following error all the time. [2011/03/14 12:31:16.549084, 1] modules/vfs_gpfs.c:1099(vfs_gpfs_ntimes) vfs_gpfs_ntimes: set GPFS ntimes failed -1 The copy continues but is slow. All the timestamps seem reasonable for the data copied. The GPFS

Some empirical testing shows that if I am using the idmap_ad module the template homedir parameter in smb.conf is ignored. I would just like to determine if this is the correct behaviour or if I am doing something wrong. JAB. -- Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk Fife, United Kingdom.

Hello, We have a Red Hat 5.3 SAMBA 3.0.33-3.7 Server that shares a few directories to 4 other servers. The other servers are Red Hat 5.3 and one Solaris 10 server. I configured SAMBA to do the following for each share; Force User: User1 Force Group: Group1 Create Mask: 02770 Security Mask: 02770 Directory Mask: 02770 Directory Security Mask: 02770 Inherit Permissions: Yes Inherit ACLS: Yes

Hi again, First, i revert to a snapashot with samba 4.7.7 and upgraded it to 4.7.8. I got no issue with my settings and "testparm" outputs as expected. Next i tried again upgrade to samba 4.8.3. But i got the same error like an email before. Yes i guess its a problem that "tesparm" cant read the registry. When im removing "include = registry" and add my global

Dear list, Setup is: Solaris 11 ZFS + Samba 3.5.10 What is the recommended way nowadays of performing strict permissions mapping between Samba and Windows NT 6.1 ? And a more broader question: is it desirable ? As we know ZFS has native NFSv4 ACL's and this would mean that permissions applied on Windows side should have an exact match on the ZFS side. Is it acl_xattr module still needed ?

Hi all, I'm trying to set up a samba (3.6.6, debian wheezy 64bit) member server on a 2008R2 domain. I'd like to be able to specify the uidnumbers users get on here in AD but I'm getting really erratic results. I've tried changing various range options, and as far as I can tell it works sometimes, but not others - don't know why. I have 2 users I've specifically set up,

All, I'm in the process of migrating a samba server from Solaris 10 (running 3.0.37) to Solaris 11 Express (running 3.5.5). The system is joined to a Win2k3 Active Directory. Migrating the configuration worked fine, the shares are available and everything mostly works as intended. The problem we're having is with the syntax of authentication requests from Windows client machines. On the

Samba4 with Linux and Windows clients wanting to get the same home folder data. Hi A college has students arranged with Linux home directories according to which year they belong to and which class within that year, a or b or whatever, they belong to e.g.: /home2/students/year7/year7a/student1 /home2/students/year7/year7a/student2 ... ... /home2/students/year13/year13a/student2500 To get at

I have been trying to configure/compile Samba 3.5.2 and 3.4.7 on AIX 5.3 with ML-11 and ML-10. The configure issues that I am getting only occur if I use --with-ads. I can run configure on both versions if I do not include ADS support. The errors I get are: checking for krb5_principal_get_realm... no checking for krb5_princ_realm... no configure: WARNING: krb5_mk_req_extended not found in

I am using Samba 3.6.6 on Debian Wheezy. I want to be able to change www files on my dev server using my macbook. So I setup samba and made a share for the /var/www directory. I added the users bart & root to samba to connect. And connect using command K and then smb://192.168.2.100 (my samba server). As apache uses www-data as a user and group for the www files I use force user and

[2009/11/18 12:41:05, 1] winbindd/idmap.c:438(idmap_init_passdb_domain) Could not init passdb idmap domain [2009/11/18 12:41:05, 1] winbindd/idmap_tdb.c:214(idmap_tdb_load_ranges) idmap uid missing [2009/11/18 12:41:05, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_idmap_alloc) idmap_alloc module tdb already registered! [2009/11/18 12:41:05, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Idmap

Hello, I am currently trying to compile newest samba 3.5.3 with ctdb (from git repository) on Debian Lenny (version 5.0.4). I am using following 'configure' command: ./configure --with-cluster-support --with-shared-modules=idmap_tdb2 --with-ads --enable-pie=no and unfortunatelly I have following error: checking for ctdb.h... no checking for ctdb_private.h... no checking for

On 15/04/16 18:54, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > I'm unable to update my Samba from 4.1.17 to 4.4.2. I'm looking to > build from tar instead. From what I gather the following should be the > steps taken. > > ./configure --without-ad-dc -- sbindir= /usr/sbin > --sysconfdir=/etc/samba/ --/usr/share/man/ > make > make install > > Am I

Hi Nicolas, On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:57:59 +0100, Nicolas Zuber via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I try to update two clustered samba file servers. Right now samba 4.7.0 > with ctdb is running on both of them. To update samba I stopped ctdb on > one of the servers, and compiled and installed samba 4.7.1 with: > > ./configure --with-cluster-support

Hi Micha, On Fri, 4 May 2018 13:57:42 +0200, Micha Ballmann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > at this time i want to install a CTDB Cluster with SAMBA 4.7.7 from SOURCE! > > I compiled samba as follow: > > |./configure| |--with-cluster-support > ||--with-shared-modules=idmap_rid,idmap_tdb2,idmap_ad| > > The whole SAMBA enviroment is located in