similar to: file server

good day Ali Bendriss, I followed exactly this tutorial to update the samba. Thank you, everyone I'll be honest as I have full knowledge about the Samba 4 will redo the structure thus have more work more on the other hand I'm sure I will not make a mistake that can generate me more trouble. Regards, Gabriel Franca > Em 14/08/2015, à(s) 09:39, Ali Bendriss <ali.bendriss at

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:46:53 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer > > >> > > Hi Rowland, > > > > This Samba 3 server is joined to a Samba 4 AD domain

Hello, I'm running samba 4.0.3. when I query the operatingsystem attribute using ldapsearch ... -P 3 "(objectCategory=computer)" The operatingsystem value returned for "Windows 7 Professionnel N" is operatingSystem:: V2luZG93c8KgNyBQcm9mZXNzaW9ubmVsIE4= which translate to Windows? 7 Professionnel N But when I look at it using dsa.msc I can read "Windows 7

Good morning friends, I have the following structure: Centos 6.6 1) AD samba using .tgz package 2) using the proxy Sernet packages which use command: samba-tool domain join XXX.corp DC -U Administrator --realm = XXX.corp and set the squid via NTLM. Issues: 1) after the update I get the following messages in / var / log / messages: Aug 13 04:08:56 kernel samba: Out of memory: Kill process

Hello, Could you please give me some precision about the current state of the winbind support on a member server. I have tried to list what I understand about it. (I suppose that the libnss_winbind symlink are correct in /lib and/or lib64) * samba4 join as member join: samba-tool domain join <dnsdomain> MEMBER smb.conf should contain: idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes the AD DC doesn't

Hi Martin It seems as though, when I go from `clustering = no` to `clustering = yes`, if I do a domain join, it will fail. However, if I do a `systemctl restart ctdb` (knowing full well it will fail every time), if after this I add a sleep(15), then do a domain join, then do a `systemctl restart ctdb`, then the join will have worked, AND CTDB will start properly. So in a nutshell, in Ansible, -

Superb. I'll take a look. Thank you On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 1:46 AM Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net> wrote: > Hi Bob, > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 09:31:59 -0400, Robert Buck <robert.buck at som.com> > wrote: > > > It seems as though, when I go from `clustering = no` to `clustering = > yes`, > > if I do a domain join, it will fail. However, if I do a

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:19:09 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer > > Hi, is the share stored on a standalone server or an AD member server or > what ? > > Not that

I have setup a SAMBA 3 cluster (running on SLES-11sp3) with 2 nodes. CTDB is managing SAMBA, using a floating IP between the two hosts. Everything is running fine as far as the cluster fail-over, etc. However, the SAMBA cluster server(s) are supposed to be member servers, connecting to an existing PDC which is using LDAP as the password backend. CTDB is inserting the following lines into the

Ubuntu 14.04, ctdb 2.5.3, samba 4.1.11. CTDB is working with IP takeover between the 2 nodes. The machine is joined to the domain. Any help with the following errors would be most gratefully received. 1. connect to socket error: ctdb status 2014/08/16 15:32:03.248034 [23255]: client/ctdb_client.c:267 Failed to connect client socket to daemon. Errno:Connection refused(111) common/cmdline.c:156

Hi 2 node drbd cluster with ocfs2. both nodes: openSUSE 4.1.9 with drbd 8.4 and ctdbd 2.3 All seems OK with ctdb: n1: ctdb status Number of nodes:2 pnn:0 192.168.0.10 OK (THIS NODE) pnn:1 192.168.0.11 OK Generation:1187222392 Size:2 hash:0 lmaster:0 hash:1 lmaster:1 Recovery mode:NORMAL (0) Recovery master:0 n2: ctdb status Number of nodes:2 pnn:0 192.168.0.10 OK pnn:1 192.168.0.11

Greetings list, I was looking at the wiki "samba and clustering" and a ctdb.pdf, admittedly both are quite old (2006 or 2007) and I don't know how things change over years, but I just have two questions about LMASTER: < this is from pdf > LMASTER fixed ? LMASTER is based on record key only ? LMASTER knows where the record is stored ? new records are stored on LMASTER Q1.

Hi to all, I'm having a CTDB-Cluster with two nodes (both Ubuntu wit Sernet-packages 4.17.4). Now I want to replace one of the nodes. The first step was to bring a new node to the CTDB-Cluster. This time a Debian 11 but with the same sernet-packages (4.17.4). Adding the new node to /etc/ctdb/nodes at the end of the list. And the virtual IP to /etc/ctdb/public_addresses, also at the end

hi guys, we're evaluating the available clustering options to get ctdb up and running for a highly available file server. we've set up both gluster and ocfs2 both on seperate 2 node setups. ocfs2 seems to provide better throughput and iops to samba clients than does gluster and that is comparing a single node server to a ctdb clustered 2 node server. problem with ocfs2 is that i've

Hi All I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, Samba 4.7.1 The node network is a direct 1Gb link Storage is Cephfs ctdb status is OK It seems to be running well so far but I'm frequently seeing the following in my log.smbd: [2018/09/18 19:16:15.897742, 0] > ../source3/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_ctdb.c:1207(fetch_locked_internal) > db_ctdb_fetch_locked for

I have been working on a CTDB cluster on and off for a while now. I had it working great for a while. THen I decide dthat I wanted to change the configuration of my replicated volumes. I changed my DRBD configuration to match my desired configuration. Now I can get the CTDB to work quite right. I am able to join the cluster to the domain without issues. I can also list my ad users and groups using

Hi, I am setting up ctdb samba, and have hit a brick wall trying to solve the following issue. 1. getent does not retrieve the list of domain users or groups (wbinfo works fine) I'm not sure what I'm missing but I've almost spent the whole day trying to resolve this one and haven't made any progress :-( Any help or suggestions are appreciated My configuration is

Dear All, I've been upgrade from 3.6.x to 4.1.x (Member server) All Win 7 Pro 64. While in 3.6.x there is no such report on the issue,just people complain about the slowness While in 4.1.x there are random report on this issue not everyone but more to a particular person... That seem to be happening from 4.1.6, 4.1.11 and 4.1.12 And I've really no idea why or how. Any suggestion to

Hi All, I'm not well versed in the samba code base so I'm asking here.. :) I only wanted to run a small AD/DC for my SOHO (1 spouse, 3 kids, 1 dog & 1 cat). I've managed to build 4.10.2 on rhel7.6 with gnutls-3.3.29 and python-2.7. (this required an updated cmocka, which in turn required an updated cmake) but... building without testsuite and without clustering (ctdb) allows

Hi all, I'm setting up a clustered environment on CentOS 7.6.1810 with Samba 4.8.3-6.el7_6 and the corresponding ctdb package. I'm using FreeIPA 4.6.4 as my auth backend. Currently I'm running into this bug https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13465 however I would assume that it is fixed in the latest release (dated 29July 2019). It crashed once CTDB runs testparm to check the