Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Arcoread7 secutiry vulnerability"
2004 Mar 29
1
cvs commit: ports/multimedia/xine Makefile
Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 08:14:29PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
>
>>Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 03:44:06PM -0800, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
>>>
>>>>eik 2004/03/28 15:44:06 PST
>>>>
>>>>FreeBSD ports repository
>>>>
>>>>Modified files:
2008 Nov 30
2
(XEN) mm.c:707:d49 Error getting mfn 2fef3 (pfn 6aef3) from L1 entry
Hi,
Can anybody advise me how to debug this crash? it happens when I try to start
a 32 bit kernel on my 64 bit Xen system, the kernel is my own using
opensuse 11.1
rc1 2.6.27.7 xen patches, the kernel works as 32 and 64 bit dom0, and
as 64 bit domU PV, is there a technique to find out where in the
kernel
source the crash happens? i.e what line in the source code?
(XEN) mm.c:707:d49 Error getting
2008 Apr 06
3
Xen 3.2.1-rc1: ptwr_emulate: could not get_page_from_l1e()
Xen 3.2.1-rc1 64 bit
Dom0: 2.6.16.33 PAE
DomU: 2.6.18.8 (from a pull a few weeks ago)
If you need the symbols, there from the same Xen I linked to in my post
from a few days ago...
(XEN) mm.c:3498:d4 ptwr_emulate: could not get_page_from_l1e()
(XEN) Unhandled page fault in domain 4 on VCPU 0 (ec=0003)
(XEN) Pagetable walk from 00000000c08187f0:
(XEN) L4[0x000] = 00000004dfa38027
2009 Mar 02
12
latest pv_ops dom0 (2.6.29-rc6) crashes / unhandled page fault
Hello.
log of the crashing boot process:
http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-bootlog-14-xen331-linux-2.6.29-rc6-crash.txt
2.6.29-rc5 based pv_ops dom0 works on the same computer.. with the same Xen version.
I tried with and without pci=nomsi.
adding ''noapic'' doesn''t seem to help (I need that with 2.6.29-rc5 to make it work).
Any ideas
2004 Mar 16
3
portaudit
Any reason why portaudit and its associated infrastructure was not announced to
this list or security-notifications? I recently discovered it, and discovered
the feature was added to bsd.port.mk in the beginning of feburary. Seeing as
the security officer apparently (without announcement) no longer issues
security notices (SNs) for ports, I am assuming that portaudit has replaced
SNs entirely,
2004 May 03
1
Bad VuXML check on PNG port ?
Hello,
The current png-1.2.5_4 port has no more vulnerability.
It has been corrected by ache@FreeBSD.org yesterday.
But when i try to install the updated port to remplace
the vulnerable one this is what i am told :
# make install
===> png-1.2.5_4 has known vulnerabilities:
>> libpng denial-of-service.
Reference:
2004 Sep 13
2
Kerberos 5 Security Alert?
Why wasn't there a FreeBSD security alert for Kerberos 5? Does FreeBSD
use the MIT implementation? I got an email from CERT about this. See
the attached message below.
--
Daniel Rudy
>From - Sat Sep 04 03:22:15 2004
X-UIDL: a8f31551eb03ca144862bddc8ccce266
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Apparently-To: dcrudy@pacbell.net via 206.190.37.79; Fri, 03 Sep 2004
2004 Dec 27
4
Found security expliot in port phpBB 2.0.8 FreeBSD4.10
I think, there is a neat exploit in the phpbb2.0.8 because I found my home
page defaced one dark morning. The patch for phpBB is here.
http://www.phpbb.com/downloads.php
The excerpt of the log is attached.
I believe the link to the described exploit is here.
http://secunia.com/advisories/13239
The defacement braggen page is here filter to show the exploited FreeBSD
machines that aneurysm.inc
2006 Jul 28
2
Ruby vulnerability?
Hi,
FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So
far it doesn't appear in the VuXML, but am I correct in presuming it will
soon?
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0604.html
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3694
cheers,
-- Joel Hatton --
Infrastructure Manager | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417
AusCERT - Australia's national
2008 Jul 03
6
2.6.26-rc8 pv_ops causes Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap
Xen: 3.2.1-rc5 64bit
Dom0: 2.6.18.8 (at cs 524) 32-pae
DomU: 2.6.26-rc8 32-pae
root at newark13:~# xm create -f /linodes/xencaker/xen.conf -c
Using config file "/linodes/xencaker/xen.conf".
Started domain xencaker
root at newark13:~#
root at newark13:~# xm dmesg
...
(XEN) traps.c:413:d332 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap [#6] on VCPU
0 [ec=0000]
(XEN)
2007 Dec 18
1
Portaudit database truncated?
December 18, 2007
Dear Madam, dear Sir,
the portaudit database is very small:
>portaudit -F
auditfile.tbz 100% of 5688 B 9737 Bps
New database installed.
>
In addition, portaudit does not complain about what it did
complain a few days ago. It seems to me that the database
is truncated.
By the way: How do I post to a mailing list without being
later spammed by the
2005 Jul 30
1
ports/84312: security/portaudit doesn't report about all security bugs
Old Synopsis: portaudit doesn't report about all security bugs
New Synopsis: security/portaudit doesn't report about all security bugs
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-security
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 29 21:37:38 GMT 2005
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=84312
2008 Feb 07
6
Loading FreeBSD in an HVM-domain on Intel-based host with GRUB
Hello all,
please tell me,
is it possible (at least theoretically)
to circumvent bug 622 [1] by using
GRUB instead of /boot/loader to load FreeBSD kernel?
Or it is silly idea: even if we bypass /boot/loader we will
not be able to run FreeBSD kernel in a HVM-domain on a
Intel-based host for some other reason?
As far as I know, GRUB can''t load FreeBSD kernel
directly, but only can
2005 Nov 14
1
Race condition in Sudo's pathname validation, version <= 1.6.8p9
http://sudo.ws/sudo/alerts/path_race.html
[ODiP] == Dmitry Grigorovich
2009 Jul 02
14
debian lenny domU installation
Hi all, a newbie question.
I''m trying to install lenny guest image (in an img file) on my lenny Dom0 by following the http://wiki.debian.org/Xen:
xm create -c xm-debian.cfg install=true install-mirror=ftp://ftp.XX.debian.org/debian
i created the xen-lenny-image.img using dd, format is ext3. disk is defined as (cfg file):
disk =
2005 May 26
0
vid%203b3676be-52e1-11d9-a9e7-0001020eed82
Dear Security Team,
Ports/japanese/samba is updated to ja-samba-2.2.12-j1.0beta1, which
fixes CAN-2004-1154.
Please update the portaudit database.
>>>>> In <200505242242.j4OMglSA099193@repoman.freebsd.org>
>>>>> Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> pav 2005-05-24 22:42:47 UTC
> FreeBSD ports repository
> Modified files:
>
2014 Mar 02
1
Problem about "access denied" and not secutiry tab missing
Hi all.
First you all thanks for your work about samba project.
I have set up a Samba 4 PDC in Debian Wheezy throught sernet repos.
When i create a new shared folder in smb.conf as:
[folder]path = /folderread only = no
and doing :
mkdir /folderchmod 777 /folder
i cannot enter this folder in a "administrator" session in a win7 previous connected to my domain, and cannot enter this folder,
2004 Oct 26
5
please test: Secure ports tree updating
CVSup is slow, insecure, and a memory hog. However, until now
it's been the only option for keeping an up-to-date ports tree,
and (thanks to all of the recent work on vuxml and portaudit)
it has become quite obvious that keeping an up-to-date ports
tree is very important.
To provide a secure, lightweight, and fast alternative to CVSup,
I've written portsnap. As the name suggests, this
2005 Dec 02
1
acroread security problem
Dear all,
I think there's a security problem with the acroread plugin for firefox.
I'm using sysutils/pwsafe to manage my passwords. A feature of this
tool is that it can copy the requested password to the X clipboard,
allowing the user to paste it (eg. in a password box), never seeing
the pass in clear.
When I load a PDF document in Firefox, the acroread process lives on
even after the
2019 Jul 23
2
Error after upgrade NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION
OK,
Thanks for all.
Regards;
On 23/07/2019 12:06, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 23/07/2019 16:02, Carlos via samba wrote:
>> I haven't more output log, because i need join in dc in last week,
>> and i "resolved"(workaround) in used samba 4.6.X -> after -> 4.8.3.
>> Sorry.....
>
> OK, it would have been nice to have the output, this is