similar to: Filtering jail IP traffic

Hello, I'm wondering about closing some information leaks in FreeBSD jails from the "outside world". Not that critical (depends on the application), but a simple user, with restricted devfs in the jail (devfsrules_jail for example from /etc/defaults/devfs.rules) can figure out the following: - network interfaces related data, via ifconfig, which contains everything, but the

Hi. Is there a 802.1x implementation (client and server) for FreeBSD -STABLE? Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam

Hi, On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. >> >> I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively

On 09/11/2017 10:42 AM, Sami Ketola wrote: >> On 11 Sep 2017, at 11.24, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> I use dovecot with a broken IMAP server (which doesn't properly implement command pipelining amongst others) as an imapc backend. >> Dovecot issues the above command sequence (SELECT and UID FETCH pipelined), which doesn't work with this server. >>

On 08 Feb 2016, at 12:56, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: > > On 02/08/16 11:16, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> Oh, you were thinking about ability to provide IMAP/etc support for other random servers, and have Dovecot act as kind of a middleware and translate the requests. Maybe the answer is still jmap though? It would require jmap lib-storage backend similar to imapc, which

On 09/11/2017 09:17 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 08.09.2017 15:29, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> On 09/08/2017 01:53 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> On 08.09.2017 14:50, Nagy, Attila wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've a broken IMAP server, which doesn't support pipelining and fails >>>> on dovecot's attempt to do this ([C] is

Hi, This is a capture from an imapc client session (which is triggered by a message, received via LMTP): * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 NAMESPACE] Ready 2 LOGIN "uid" "pass" 2 OK LOGIN succeeded 1 LIST "" "" * LIST (\Noselect) "/" "" 1 OK LIST completed 3 APPEND "INBOX" {568} + Ready for 568 octets of data [...] 3 OK APPEND

On 09/11/2017 11:14 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 11.09.2017 11:59, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> On 09/11/2017 10:42 AM, Sami Ketola wrote: >>>> On 11 Sep 2017, at 11.24, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >>>> I use dovecot with a broken IMAP server (which doesn't properly >>>> implement command pipelining amongst others) as an imapc backend.

Hi, imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively handle boundless fetches (like a list with all wanted UIDs, or simply 1:* if all are needed), do you see this as a good addition to develop? This could be a

> On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:59, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:01, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. >> I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established,

Hi, Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established, compatible protocol frontend with an open backend API, which could be used to easily make a custom storage backend for the LMTP/POP/IMAP frontend in any language, in any programming paradigm,

Hello, I have some jails running on ZFS, so I have to mount devfs's into them. For this purpose, I have some similar lines in /etc/fstab: devfs /pool/jail/ldap/dev devfs rw 0 0 Where /pool is a ZFS filesystem. This has worked until today -when I upgraded from a previous 7-STABLE (FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #16: Fri Mar 7 14:30:08 CET 2008) to today's STABLE- but not

Hi, Non-standard fields are mentioned here: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir and they are stated as currently not used. Questions: - am I right that if they will be used, they will be key=value pairs, like fields in the base filename? Like: 1035478339.27041_118.foo.org,S=1000,W=1030:2,S,X=12,A=something - or are they supposed to be flags, like:

Hi, I have the following config in dovecot 2.2.18: # doveconf -n userdb passdb userdb { driver = prefetch } passdb { args = host=127.0.0.1 port=1430 default_fields = userdb_imapc_user=%u userdb_imapc_password=%w driver = imap } I guess it should cause a single login to the backend IMAP server when issuing a LOGIN to dovecot. Yet, dovecot opens two TCP sessions. In the first, it

Hi, I'm trying to migrate from the deprecated autocreate plugin to the mailbox { auto }setting without success. What do I forget, or misunderstand? I deliver mails via LMTP and log in on IMAP, neither of them create the folders other than the inbox itself. # doveconf -n # 2.2.2: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE amd64 auth_cache_negative_ttl = 0 auth_cache_size

On 09/08/2017 01:53 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 08.09.2017 14:50, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've a broken IMAP server, which doesn't support pipelining and fails >> on dovecot's attempt to do this ([C] is dovecot's imapc, [S] is the >> IMAP server): >> >> [C] 24 LOGIN "user" "pass" >> [S] 23 OK

On 09/23/2016 08:05 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 29.07.2016 15:35, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> I use pass and userdb with dict protocol in a similar way: >> >> key passdb { >> key = passdb^MAuth-User: %u^MAuth-Pass: %w^MAuth-Protocol: >> %s^MClient-IP: %r >> format = json >> } >> >> (^M is an \r character, inserted with vi CTRL-v + enter)

In the next month or two I've got to upgrade a number of servers that are currently on an EOL'd version of 4-STABLE. I foresee that I'll have very limited time to do full OS upgrades on these systems in the coming several years, so I want to make sure I bring them onto an extended-life branch. Right now 4.11 has the furthest projected EOL date (Jan 31 2007), and the projected EOL

On 09/11/2017 03:01 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 11.09.2017 15:56, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> On 09/11/2017 12:12 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> Is there some reason you can't use normal proxy instead of imap backend? >>> That is,return proxy, host=imap_backend, port=1430? There seems to be no >>> pipeline setting currently for imapc in v2.2. >>> >> Yes,

Hi, I've a broken IMAP server, which doesn't support pipelining and fails on dovecot's attempt to do this ([C] is dovecot's imapc, [S] is the IMAP server): [C] 24 LOGIN "user" "pass" [S] 23 OK [C] 25 SELECT "INBOX" [C] 23 UID FETCH 2 (INTERNALDATE) [S] 25 OK [S] 23 BAD No mailbox selected Sadly, fixing the server would be a hard task, turning off