similar to: smbclient php extension

?Hi,? On 10 March 2014 18:13, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr>wrote: > Ok i give up. I will stick with the old version version (4.07) which works > well with dell 380 and 790. > > I tried to understand what happened between 4.07 and 5 but i don't have > the skill to understand low level c. > > Seems that the memory management changed a lot, maybe

I hit a weird problem with the default PHP 5.1.6 on CentoS 5.2. It seems the default 5.1.6 PHP on CentOS has a bug in the functions escapeshellargs/escapeshellcmd: it "gulps" any special (non-ASCII) characters, so that they are missing from the output. I have been assured that this does not happen on other 5.1.6 or newer on other Linux distributions. I don't see this behavior

Hi, I've just upgraded an old samba 3.0.23 on an old Fedora Core 5 to samba 3.5.4 using an rpm built from the source. Everything works fine, but when i start the server i get some error messages(see below). Before i start the server there is no connection (tested with lsof and fuser) on the 139 and 445 ports, smbd or nmbd aren't running. With the old version i never had this

Yes on optiplex 790 i upgraded from A07 to A18 (there was a nic upgrade) but it didn't change anything.. On optiplex 380 i upgraded from bios A01 to A07(don't know if upgrade contained pxe or not)... I tried, lpxelinux.0 and it wasn't faster. Only v4.07 helped on these machines. Tomorrow, i will give a try with 6.03pre2. In wireshark, i saw no errors, the packet length was the

Le 11/03/2014 00:56, Gene Cumm a ?crit : > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 10 March 2014 18:13,

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr> wrote: > Le 11/03/2014 15:27, Ady a ?crit : > >>> Le 11/03/2014 10:32, Eric PEYREMORTE a ?crit : >>> Some news here. I didn't test with 5.01 yet (didn't see that one sorry). >>> With 5.01 i don't have any problem. Problems begin with 5.10. >>> --

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 10 March 2014 18:13, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr>wrote: >> >>> Ok i give up. I will stick with the old version version (4.07) which works

Le 11/03/2014 10:32, Eric PEYREMORTE a ?crit : > Le 11/03/2014 00:56, Gene Cumm a ?crit : >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro >>>> <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote:

I did some additional tests : On a dell optiplex 380, i disabled internal nic, added a 3com 905c tx external pci nic : very slow too. On a dell 740(which is always fast), i put the 3com to be sure : very fast. So it seems it is not related to the nic itself. To be sure it wasn't just one failing computer i tested several 380. I tried disabling several features in bios, like Execute

On 21 September 2017 at 10:14, Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas > > Kovacs > > Sent: den 21 september 2017 11:05 > > To: centos at centos.org > > Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 7: changes to php.ini > > > > I'm hosting a few

Hi there, We had to setup a pxelinux on a new server (windows 2012) and used the latest release of pxelinux 6.0.2. Everything went ok on my first client test machine : dell optiplex 740. Pxe was really fast (vesamenu with large background image was appearing in less than 3 secondes) But on different client machine i got different results : On optiplex 790 (core i5 with intel 82579 nic) and

-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs Sent: den 19 september 2017 09:37 To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma Hi, I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for

On 09/23/2016 04:42 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > Of course this is where Red Hat intends SCL to fill the gap of the > "supported" new httpd24 and php56 on RHEL ... > > https://www.hogarthuk.com/?q=node/15 > > Unfortunately this is having a knock on effect in the EPEL world > where, since Fedora has no SCL packaging guidelines and RHSCL is not > included in repos

Am 2017-09-19 09:36, schrieb Nicolas Kovacs: > Hi, > > I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox > CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for the last two years for my > own purposes on a Slackware server, and I'm quite happy with it. > > In my humble opinion, every admin who wants to host OwnCloud or > Nextcloud on a RHEL/CentOS

On 09/19/2017 06:41 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 19.09.2017 um 09:36 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>: >> >> I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox >> CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for the last two years for my >> own purposes on a Slackware server, and I'm quite happy with it. >> >> In

Am 19.09.2017 um 09:36 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>: > > I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox > CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for the last two years for my > own purposes on a Slackware server, and I'm quite happy with it. > > In my humble opinion, every admin who wants to host OwnCloud or >

Le 11/03/2014 17:54, Gene Cumm a ?crit : > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Eric PEYREMORTE > <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr> wrote: >> Le 11/03/2014 15:27, Ady a ?crit : >> >>>> Le 11/03/2014 10:32, Eric PEYREMORTE a ?crit : >>>> Some news here. I didn't test with 5.01 yet (didn't see that one sorry). >>>> With 5.01 i

> Le 11/03/2014 10:32, Eric PEYREMORTE a ?crit : > Some news here. I didn't test with 5.01 yet (didn't see that one sorry). > With 5.01 i don't have any problem. Problems begin with 5.10. > -- > Eric PEYREMORTE Hello Eric: To sum up your report: _ 4.0x works; _ 4.10-pre22 (lwip branch) works; _ 5.01 (elflink branch) works; _ 5.10 (lwip merge into elflink) fails; I

Notice the same thing happens with optiplex 790 (core i5 sandy bridge). With 790 too everything is ok with pxelinx 4.0.7. I'll post a wireshark later. Le 25/02/2014 17:06, H. Peter Anvin a ?crit : > On 02/25/2014 07:45 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 02/25/2014 07:07 AM, Eric PEYREMORTE wrote: >>> I did some additional tests : >>> >>> On a dell optiplex

Hi, We only have Dell computers here. We have about 100 optiplex 380. Here is a link to download my wireshark traces : http://dl.free.fr/qgCPEM5Uo In this traces i tested pxelinux and lpxelinux 6.03 on optiplex 740(the one working) and optiplex 380. pxelinux works on both computers but very slowly on 380 as seen in traces. lpxelinux works only on 740. On 380 it seems to enter in a kind of