similar to: detect-renamed.diff update to ensure existence of directory for partial-dir

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847 Summary: detect-renamed.diff update to ensure existence of directory for partial-dir Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Wayne, The detect-renamed.diff in the current CVS rsync appears to be very badly broken. I have fixed it and made some other improvements: Crash fixes: - Move misplaced the_fattr_list initialization hunk back to recv_file_list - Send --detect-renamed to the sender so it knows to disable incremental recursion - With --partial-dir=. , look_for_rename returns rather than crashing Improvements:

Hello, I need to run rsync on a mac (OS X 10.6.5) with the --detect-renamed option available. I therefore started to compile rsync with the 3 relevant patches (in my opinion) : - fileflags.diff - crtimes.diff - detect-renamed.diff Here are my exact compile instructions : patch -p1 <patches/fileflags.diff patch -p1 <patches/crtimes.diff patch -p1 <patches/detect-renamed.diff

On 10/13/07, Wayne Davison <wayned@samba.org> committed: > Added Files: > detect-renamed-lax.diff > Log Message: > My version of Matt's --trust-rename patch. The option --detect-moved should be named --detect-moved-lax because it contains the lax behavior. --detect-moved would mean "use a file with the same basename as an alternate basis". Matt

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #22 from elatllat at gmail.com --- Wow 10 years. Maybe one reason this has not been implemented is there are other options. For example I have been using a shell script as a wrapper to reduce the iteration of this bug, here is how it works: 1) Create 2 lists of files; destination and source with the files sizes and path 2) For each file

Hi, I played around with the combination of rsync --detect-renamed --detect-moved and -b. Given the following tree: src/dir/file dest/src/dir/file I renamed src/dir to src/dir2 and ran the following command: rsync -a --detect-renamed --detect-moved --delete -b --backup-dir=bak src dest ending up with: dest/bak/src/dir/file Is it supposed to do that? I was expecting it to detect the renamed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #26 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> --- ### What's the diff between --fuzzy and --detect-renamed ? If I understand correctly, --fuzzy looks only in destination folder, for either a file that has an identical size and modified-time, or a similarly-named file, and uses it as a basis file. Whereas --detect-renamed looks

Hello, I was looking for "detect renamed" feature in rsync (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294) so used rsync-3.0.9 with patches detect-renamed.diff and detect-renamed-lax.diff. I have 2 questions, not sure if I'm missing something (options) or if it is working as intended and could be improved. 1) It does not detect a rename when a file is moved into another

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #20 from kevin.layer at gmail.com 2014-03-02 03:08:37 UTC --- I've been playing with the --detect-renamed patch https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=blob;f=detect-renamed.diff;h=c3e6e846eab437e56e25e2c334e292996ee84345;hb=master I can't get seem it to work. Does it rely on other patches? Anyway, in a simple test, using

Hello, Object of my mail : 1/ stick a problem of incompatibylity between 2 patches (fileflags.diff & detect-renamed.diff) 2/ proposition of a correction I wanted to run rsync on a mac (OS X 10.6.5) with the --detect-renamed option. I therefore tried to compile rsync with the 3 relevant patches : - fileflags.diff - crtimes.diff - detect-renamed.diff But the patch detect-renamed.diff is

Dear collegaues, please evaluate the patch attached, which allow to use both --detect-renamed and --fileflags extra features. This is meta-patch which sould be applied to detect-renamed. fileflags patch should be applied first, following by the modified detect-renamed patch. It is included in current FreeBSD port, but it seems it would be much more useful to be supported by samba

Hi lhere, i'm trying the detect-renamed patch in 2.6.7pre2 in a really small scenario. Having two dirs with some files rsyncing to destination. First I have no delete switches on, at least I will need them. Heres the command I use: rsync -e "ssh -i /root/.ssh/srv-key" -r -p -o -g -v -z -l -t --detect-renamed --stats /root/test/ srv:/root/test --progress (--fuzzy) When I

Hello, I'm totally new to this list, so I hope I don't break all the rules. :) I've looked through the archives (and google), and I really can't find the answer to my question. I'm trying out the 'detect-renamed'-patch, and I've encountered some odd behavior. I've applied the patch to both rsync-2.6.9 and rsync-3.0.0pre7, and it's the same behavior.

I've started testing the detect-renamed patch with 2.6.9 and soon 3.0.0pre1. I have an unique situation where I'm rsync'ing to a HSM based filesystem. I've found that the detect-renamed patch works but it appears to do a copy of the file to the new destination. This is particular slow since the file in the HSM based filesystem may only be a stub and all the data is only resident

Hi, I read that rsync can find files that we renamed. So, I would like to know how it can do that, if it's really possible ? I think there is a link with the file-list but I don't understand how it can detect that a file named 'test' is the same than the file renamed 'test_bis' for example. I didn't test it so I don't know if my question is correct. Micka?l

While trying to find a strategy to avoid duplicating renamed files and folders I came across threads about a "dtetect-renamed" option. This was a patch back in 2006 but I cannot find much about it later. Was this aborted? Are there any other ways of smart-ly detecting renames? -- Rahul

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 boris@folgmann.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |boris@folgmann.de ------- Comment #6 from boris@folgmann.de 2007-07-11 09:50 CST ------- I'm using rsync 2.6.9 to archive rotated

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 Summary: Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 ------- Comment #8 from bill+samba@bfccomputing.com 2008-11-30 17:24 CST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks. This will be especially useful for log directories where logrotate is > incrementing the filename number at each rotation period (httpd.10.gz -> > httpd.11.gz). Since I mentioned this specific use case, I should

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #27 from Wolfgang Hamann <wolfgang at maas-noten.de> --- Hi, I recently ran into the problem that a large file set got renamed and then re-sent. I tried to fix after the fact, so I went the obvious way of comparing sizes and modtimes on the destination and calculate checksums for potential matches. I would have preferred to use a