similar to: Samba4 domain controller ntlm_auth error - No logon servers (0xc000005e)

I can share my notes, we authenticate UniFi clients via Freeradius against Samba AD. We also check group membership which you might or might not need: ## 4 FreeRADIUS ### 4.1 Basics ```bash apt install freeradius freeradius-ldap freeradius-utils # create new DH-params openssl dhparam -out /etc/freeradius/3.0/certs/dh 2048 ``` ### 4.2 Configure Authentication - modify mschap to use winbind,

Hi all, I've configured FreeRADIUS for PEAP and I'm forwarding the NTLM authentication to our Windows Active Directory. I'm using the following script to proxy the MSCHAPv2 NTLM credentials: /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=ntlm-server-1 >> /tmp/log << @EOF Username: ${1/NTDOMAIN01\\\\} Full-Username: ${1} LANMAN-Challenge: ${2} NT-Response: ${3} . @EOF (This

Hello Alexander, thanks Alexander for these configuration snippets. Which version of Samba are you using? Is this on debian bullseye? Is the FreeRADIUS server installed on a DC or on a Domain Member? (I just tested the latter). is "ntlm auth = yes" OK for the DCs and the domain member or does it have to be "mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only" for all servers (DCs + Member)? It

Hi Matthias, we?re using Debian Bullseye with the backports repo. So version is a mixture of - Samba version 4.17.3-Debian - Samba version 4.17.7-Debian We?ve installed it directly on the DC?s as well. In my opinion using "ntlm auth = yes? should be fine. Did you try using a simple RADIUS secret? In my experience long secrets or ones containing special characters don?t work very well. I

On 10/18/2016 4:54 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote: > Unfortunately, we don't have a C-only front-end, nor you can select > some C-only libraries in LLVM to compile C-only code. Such a goal > should have been set from the beginning, and honestly, it would have > made LLVM's code horrendous to work with. An option would be to have a C backend again, and then cross-compile

I had to downgrade samba on a rh5.5 instance due to ntlm_auth not working properly: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=561325 Now, when I add the computer to the domain ('net ads join ?U Administrator') it seems to work, is visible on the AD interface, but the logs show an error: Nov 11 16:03:22 rhclient winbindd[4483]: [2010/11/11 16:03:22, 0]

Ok I tried signing a module... Did not work. + openssl req -new -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout MOK.priv -outform DER -out MOK.der -nodes -days 36500 -subj '/CN=dahdi Modules/' Generating a 2048 bit RSA private key ......................................+++ ..............................................................................+++ writing new private key to 'MOK.priv' -----

Hi all, I don?t have much experience with Samba so I would like to apologize in advance if I talk about very simple things. I've got a freeradius 1.0.1 server running fine with OpenLDAP on a RedHat 9.0 and now I would like to authenticate against an Active Directory. I can do it with TLS, but when I try to do it with PEAP, it doesn works. I read about it and found out that should be put on

Hi Alexander, I'm terribly sorry. We didnt have the "ntlm auth" parameter configured on the DCs at all. I added it and it just works. Thanks for your help. Now I just need to figure out how I can make WLAN-specific LDAP-Group authentication. e. g. production WLAN needs LDAP group "wlan_production" and management WLAN needs the "wlan_management" group. I

I'm trying to setup samba4 alpha 8 as a domain controller on fedora core 10. The compile and install seems to have gone well, but the provision step is failing: ?./setup/provision --realm=peap.local --domain=peap.local --server-role='domain controller' Setting up secrets.ldb Setting up the registry Setting up templates db Setting up idmap db schema_fsmo_init: no schema

Hi Phil, Your correct. I missed a step about importing the key: mokutil --import MOK.der So then I rebooted entered teh MOK, accepted all certs and rebooted and it loaded. I only have one problem with this... many of my systems are remote. I "will not" be able to remotely enter the MOK and accept the certs etc... How do I get around this? Recall that my hardware (NUC7C) does not

I've noticed that when a Windows computer that is in my domain connects to my WPA-Enterprise wifi it first attempts to authenticate with the SSID using the domain member's machine account, instead of prompting the user to enter their own credentials. Has anyone ever tried to do this with a Linux domain member? For example, my linux domain member laptop uses Network Manager as the GUI,

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> > wrote: > > No worries, thanks for the update. Teresa > > 2048 wasn't enough. Bumped to 4096. Only 1300 ninja targets left. > > Once I've been successful with this, I might try building a

Hi Michael and Samba-team, I found below message on the list, but it looks like nobody replied to it. I have the configuration setup on the Samba-side and indeed it works on Windows with machine-account authentication. It connects to wifi before a user logs in and there is no chance of lockout due to an expired user password in the wifi configuration. I would love to have the same working on

Hello: Is there a way to get a mean from values stored in different rows? The data looks like this: YEAR-1, JAN, FEB, ..., DEC YEAR-2, JAN, FEB, ..., DEC YEAR-3, JAN, FEB, ..., DEC What I want is the mean(s) for just the consecutive winter months: YEAR-1.DEC, YEAR-2.JAN, YEAR-2.FEB YEAR-2.DEC, YEAR-3.JAN, YEAR-3.FEB etc. Thanks.

On 02/08/2020 16:26, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On the side note: it is Microsoft that signs one of Linux packages now. We seem to have made one more step away from ?our? computers being _our computers_. Am I wrong? > > Valeri > Microsoft are the Certificate Authority for SecureBoot and most SB-enabled hardware (most x86 hardware) comes with a copy of the Microsoft key

patch against recent SVN ... as far as I can tell this trivial typo has been there for 20 years: https://github.com/wch/r-source/blame/ba7920a99fb2fb62b89e404e65f8b132ed4c150a/src/library/base/man/pretty.Rd =================================================================== --- pretty.Rd (revision 74426) +++ pretty.Rd (working copy) @@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ \item{min.n}{nonnegative integer giving

I am trying to use ntlm_auth for machine authentication requests against a Win2003/AD from my RADIUS server. Normal, user authentication works fine, but not machine authentication. The username passed from RADIUS to ntlm-auth looks like host/pcname123. I'm wondering if the "/" is killing it? The ntlm_auth man page says that it expects only Samba's unix charset. Does anyone

At http://groups.google.de/group/mailing.unix.samba/browse_frm/thread/3806dd92303380d1/10f21511e488d8d0?lnk=st&q=ntlm_auth++%22machine+authentication%22&rnum=1&hl=de#10f21511e488d8d0 the question is discussed, whether ntlm_auth can be used for machine authentication against a Win2003/AD. and the conclusion seems to be, that it is not really clear: >Machine accounts are a problem

Hi, This is not the purpose of my distro. The purpose of my distro is to account for complexity lock-in and to remove this as much as possible. This complexity is usually performed in 2 ways: - ultra costly languages/runtime to implement (c++/java...), and I don't think "ultra" is a word big enough. - multiplication of script languages