similar to: patches in distros - include upstream ?

we have setup a two level proxy configuration for our zimbra server: [ dovecot 2.2.12 (imap proxy mode) ] V [ nginx (imap proxy mode) ] V [ zimbra imap server] and it does not work ... after tying a login, the connection just hangs and ends after 30 seconds with a timeout. - if I try again rightaway in the same dovecot connection, the login goes though without trouble.

Hi List, I have updated my rsync fadvise patch which stops rsync from ousting all your other data from cache when running large jobs. I have also written an article about the whole issue. http://insights.oetiker.ch/linux/fadvise.html cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten http://it.oetiker.ch tobi@oetiker.ch ++41 62 213 9902

Hi List, I am using rsync for hard-link backup. I found that there is a major problem with frequent backup filling up the file system cache with all the data from the files being backed up. The effect is that all the other 'sensible' data in the cache gets thrown out in the process. This is rather unfortunate as the performance of the system becomes very bad after running rsync. Some

Hi Net, How can I enable debug messages in the imap-proxy client? Trying to figure why the imap-proxy mode does not work towards ngnix. specifically, how can i set conn->client->set.debug in ./src/lib-imap-client/imapc-connection.c cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland www.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch +41 62 775 9902 *** We are hiring

I have been testing the SNAP-2000082900 on solaris ... earlier I wrote that the 'connection dies on exit of x11 forwarded motif application' bug was solved with this release ... unfortunately further testing showed that it just did not occur on the machine I tested. All our other machines still show it ... cheers tobi -- ______ __ _ /_ __/_ / / (_) Oetiker, Timelord &

Eric Christopher wrote: > How are you trying to call it? Do you have a DataLayout? In test/Analysis/ValueTracking/memory-dereferenceable.ll, just change byval to dereferenceable(8), and %dparam won't match (see lib/IR/Value.cpp:521 for the logic that is supposed to fire). How do I get it to pass? I tried introducing a target-triple and target-datalayout, but it didn't help.

rrsync used to throw the error /usr/local/bin/rrsync: invalid rsync-command syntax or options when run under BackupPC 3.2.1, with this patch full and incremental backups work. --- support/rrsync | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/support/rrsync b/support/rrsync index 6f83f9d..c231ea3 100644 --- a/support/rrsync +++ b/support/rrsync @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ our

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7004 Summary: Use posix_fadvise to free cached file contents when done Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ted at

Dear OpenSSH gurus! ;-) I recently upgraded from "OpenSSH 2.1.1p4" to "OpenSSH 2.3.0p1" on my Linux 2.2.17 box with OpenSSL 0.9.5a (RedHat 7.0). According to the "ChangeLog", there was a change in SIGPIPE handling: | 20000930 | [...] | - (djm) Ignore SIGPIPEs from serverloop to child. Fixes crashes with | very short lived X connections. Bug report from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9560 Summary: drop-cache option Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: colundrum at gmail.com QAContact: rsync-qa at

I believe that the changes to support --preallocate and --sparse together have broken --preallocate by itself (commit f3873b3d88b61167b106e7b9227a20147f8f6197) The previous behavior of --preallocate was to do just that: reserve blocks in the filesystem WITHOUT setting the size of the file to the final length. The reported filesize would change as the preallocated blocks were actually written.

On 12 May 2016 at 16:56, Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com> wrote: > In my opinion, it would be better overall for the LLVM project if > top-of-trunk is > tested as much as possible, if testing resources are so scarce that a > choice > has to be made between testing top-of-trunk or testing a release branch. > I agree that trunk is more important, with both of my

On Oct 18, 2018, at 6:52 PM, Japheth Cleaver <cleaver at terabithia.org> wrote: > > Conoboy, on the other hand, takes great pains during the speech to describe a much more fluid and complex interaction between CentOS and its upstream, and puts forth CentOS as a mechanism (perhaps the best mechanism) for the winder EL community to contribute (something?) back into RHEL's future. I

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 05:52:12PM -0700, Japheth Cleaver wrote: > The wider EL community is trapped between a rock and a hard place > somewhat. If you try to direct Fedora into the needs of EL users, > you stand a good chance of getting told to pound stand, and that EL > is getting in the way of bleeding-edge progress. Traditionally, For what it's worth (I hope something!) I

On 10/20/18 8:37 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Oh, great, I now can see the world with your eyes! And last part about > servers life cycle wise doesn't sound much different from what I do using > FreeBSD and jails. The only difference is maybe in how frequently I have > to reboot Linux (any flavor) due to kernel or glibc security update > compared to reboot of FreeBSD. Yup.

On 10/20/18 7:42 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > I would like to hear the reasons of those who chose to use Fedora on their > server. Specifically what advantages one has found compared to other > alternatives. And also what kind of server that is. Single > user/home/family one? Serving some department or similar (say 100 people, > who may need services 24/7/365)? I know, this is just

On Thu, 12 May 2016 16:40:44 +0100 David Chisnall via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The end result is that shortly after a release (sometimes every alternate release) is branched a load of downstream projects update to the new APIs, test things, and find a bunch of regressions that have been sitting in the tree for months. We then have to scrabble to bisect and try

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8775 Summary: Preallocate option doesn't work with recursive? Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: wgordonharris at

On 12 May 2016 at 16:57, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > Errr, Stephen has spoken up here, but my folks are in contact with android > folks pretty much every week, and I don't think what you are stating is > correct on a lot of fronts. I obviously don't speak for Android and have already apologised to Steve about my choice of words. > So if android is

I've read in Phil Spector's new book that it's a good idea to preallocate a big matrix, like u <- matrix(0,nrow,ncol) # (1) Now, I read contents of a huge matrix from a Fortran binary dump. u <- readBin(con,what="double",n=nrow*ncol) # (2) If I do (1) and then (2), u is a vector, obviously it's either reallocated or its matrix nature is lost -- overridden?