similar to: shutdown a windows guest take ages..... (20- 34 minutes here)

Hi! i have a problem with iotop : root at alien: ~ # iotop Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/iotop", line 16, in ? main() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/iotop/ui.py", line 567, in main main_loop() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/iotop/ui.py", line 557, in <lambda> main_loop = lambda: run_iotop(options) File

Hi Steve, MTA = Postfix I have amavis - spamassassin - dspam installed. i think spamassassin scnas after dspam, cuase in the mail headers dspam comes at first. I use Dovecot as Imap Server OS = Gentoo Linux i put the config of dspam here = http://rafb.net/p/VCX8XO97.html if u need more confs just tell me , i can paste then marko Steve schrieb: > Hallo Marko > > This is not

On 06/21/2011 01:15 PM, Jan Stilow wrote: > Hello, > > Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek <at> gentoo.org> writes: >> [...] >> >> Every few minutes, (I guess) when applications do fsync (firefox, >> xchat, vim, etc), all applications that use fsync() hang for several >> seconds, and applications that use general IO suffer extreme >> slowdowns.

Hi, On R 2.10.1 for Windows, when I do the following to duplicate the structure of a large numeric matrix called matrix1: matrix2 <- matrix(0,nrow=nrow(matrix1),ncol=ncol(matrix1)) and then rownames(matrix2) <- rownames(matrix1) I get a "cannot allocate vector of size xxMb" error but if I instead do: rnames <- list() rnames <- rownames(matrix1) matrix2 <-

Is there something like iotop in rpm form available for Centos 4.x? Matt

At my place we don't use SELinux because we have a gazillion tonnes of legacy software that just are not compatible with the default policies. No one wants to go to the effort of working out everything that needs changing. We also use cfengine for central management. Which somestimes causes a problem when CFe modifies a file that I don't want modified on my machine. So I want to be able

hello list, i need help. dovecot dont look into my virtual_alias_maps . i set via postzfixadmin an alias postmaster at domain.tld to newmail at domainother.tld. when i send mails to postmaster at domain.tld mails are rejected. dovecot authworker tells me in log: user unknown. but i can request the data via postmap -v -q postmaster at domain.tld mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias.cf and get

Hi ! I have a server (Centos 5) that is using a pair of SAS drives to store the data. (Mail server) They are on an adaptec raid controler with a battery backup and write back cache active. >From time to time, I have sever peak io to those data disks (> 400 to 500 iops, > 70 to 100 megs/sec). With iostat, I find that it's almost a write i/o problem. How can I find to which files

> On 26 Jul 2017, at 7:57 pm, Olaf Hopp <Olaf.Hopp at kit.edu> wrote: > > Dear collegues, > > many thanks for your valuable input. > > Since we are an university GEO-IP blocking is not an option for us. > Somestimes I think it should ;-) > > My "mistake" was that I had just *one* fail2ban filter for both cases: > "wrong password" and

getting this when starting virt-manager databunka src # virt-manager Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py", line 383, in <module> main() File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager.py", line 285, in main raise RuntimeError(_("Unable to initialize GTK: %s") % gtk_error) RuntimeError: Kann GTK nicht

Is this Howto http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/DovecotLDAPostfixAdminMySQL actual also for Dovecot 2.x ? Cause i read Dovecot 1.x in the Howto Thank you for any hints / tipps Marko (from cold Hamburg Harbour)

I updated my backup server this weekend from CentOS 7 to CentOS 8. OS disk is SSD, /dev/md0 are two 4TB WD mechanical drives. No hardware was changed. 1. wiped all drives 2. installed new copy of 8 on system SSD 3. re-created the 4TB mirror /dev/md0 with the same WD mechanical drives 4. created the largest single partition possible on /dev/md0 and formatted it ext4 5. waited several hours for the

dear timo, can you help me? best regards marko, from hamburg

Hey, I''ve a 2x4TB RAID1 setup with btrfs on kernel 3.8.0. Under high I/O load (BackupPC dump or writing a large file over gigabit) I get messages in syslog such as the one mentioned in the subject. The full non-logcheck-ignored log is under [1]. A BackupPC dump between the same exact machines onto a 2TB ext4 volume take 90 minutes on average, the process on the btrfs volume took 465

Hello, I''m a newby to dtrace and have just installed the dtrace toolkit v0.92 on a core soalris 10 1/06 installation on SUN v40z. I have tried the following commands: iotop iosnoop but I get the message dtrace: invalid probe specifier and a lot of code. At the end it says: : in action list: failed to resolve uid: Unknown variable name Could it be, that there are some

Hi, I'm running dovecot 2.2.x and I'm having an issue where I see many dovecot processes use all the available IO on a server. According to iotop the worst offenders seem to be in this state (NOTE: I swapped in phony username & IP info): dovecot/imap [someusername 123.456.789.012 UID SEARCH] The server in question is running with Maildirs on top of an XFS filesystem. Is there

Hi Everyone, My Xen host has 2 X 1TB hard drives in a RAID1 setup. If one DomU starts to dd a 5GB file (A ran it in a loop as a test), access ssh on the other DomU becomes very slow. Is this normal? Many Thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi All. I've updated my system from 6.3 to 6.4. In my /etc/yum.repos.depel.repo I have: [epel] name=Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux - $basearch #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/$basearch mirrorlist= http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-6&arch=$basearch failovermethod=priority gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5

Hi there, I have an old server (home use now), and i just did a fresh install of 5.8 on it. But the disk is constantly noisy. When running iotop, there is nothing blaring out at me. (sample output) 1722 be/3 root 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 0.10 % auditd 3 be/7 root 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 0.00 % [ksoftirqd/0] 1724 be/2 root 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.10 % 0.00

Franz Fellner <alpine.art.de at gmail.com> writes: > I also suffer from bad performance of notmuch new. I used notmuch > some years ago and notmuch new always felt instantanious. Had to stop > using it because internet was too slow to sync my mails :/ Now (with > better internet and a completely new setup using mbsync) indexing one > mail takes at least 10 seconds,