similar to: Samba + NFS4 + ACLs

Hi everyone We're really struggling with nfs4 <--> windows acls. Scenario Samba4 share --> cifs --> win7. No problem Samba4 share --> nfs4 --> Linux. acls not inherited Neither is there inheritance vica versa. e.g. It is not possible to create files with group rw on a umask 0022 nfs4 share. nfs4_setfacl cannot override umask. Using POSIX or windows acls this works

Le mer. 15 mai 2024 ? 12:32, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On Wed, 15 May 2024 10:36:03 +0200 > mathias dufresne via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Is it possible on Linux systems to share through SMB managed by Samba > > some NFS4 mounted FS and that Samba is using NFS4 ACLs only?

On Wed, 15 May 2024 13:02:24 +0200 mathias dufresne via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Le mer. 15 mai 2024 ? 12:32, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > > On Wed, 15 May 2024 10:36:03 +0200 > > mathias dufresne via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > >

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:17:36AM -0400, Kevin Taylor wrote: > Name : nfs4-acl-tools Relocations: (not relocatable) > Version : 0.3.3 Vendor: CentOS > Release : 6.el6 Build Date: Fri 22 Jun 2012 02:10:47 AM EDT > Install Date: Mon 31 Mar 2014 10:41:48 AM EDT Build Host: c6b10.bsys.dev.centos.org >

On Wed, 15 May 2024 10:36:03 +0200 mathias dufresne via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Is it possible on Linux systems to share through SMB managed by Samba > some NFS4 mounted FS and that Samba is using NFS4 ACLs only? Re sharing an NFS filesystem by Samba isn't a good idea. > > The point would be to not store anything on Samba

Hi everyone, Is it possible on Linux systems to share through SMB managed by Samba some NFS4 mounted FS and that Samba is using NFS4 ACLs only? The point would be to not store anything on Samba regarding ACLs... Best regards, mathias

On 17/11/16 13:15, Reinald Gfuellner via samba wrote: > I try to set up a Samba4-based Fileserver in an Samba3-DC enviroment. > Filesystem is ext4, CIFS + NFS4 should be provided. The same ACLs should > be used over both protocols. > > With Samba 3 this was possible (using POSIX 1003.1e DRAFT 17 ACLs only) > . How can I do the same with Samba 4 ? > > Posix-ACLs set on

> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:59:47 +0100 > From: Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE > To: groucho.64738 at hotmail.com > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] NFS4 ACLs with samba 3 (or 4) > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:17:34PM -0400, Kevin Taylor wrote: > > I know this was discussed a lot a few years ago, but my google searches aren't quite getting me where

> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:59:47 +0100 > From: Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE > To: groucho.64738 at hotmail.com > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] NFS4 ACLs with samba 3 (or 4) > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:17:34PM -0400, Kevin Taylor wrote: > > I know this was discussed a lot a few years ago, but my google searches aren't quite getting me where

I try to set up a Samba4-based Fileserver in an Samba3-DC enviroment. Filesystem is ext4, CIFS + NFS4 should be provided. The same ACLs should be used over both protocols. With Samba 3 this was possible (using POSIX 1003.1e DRAFT 17 ACLs only) . How can I do the same with Samba 4 ? Posix-ACLs set on the server with setfacl are recogniced on a windows-client. But every change I do on a

Am 19.03.2015 um 17:39 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:16:20AM -0400, Kevin Taylor wrote: > >> Unfortunately I'm not a programmer, so I don't know if there is an API or not. As far as me the user can tell is that we have an NFSv4 filesystem mounted on the linux box. We have tools available through the nfs4-acl-tools package (this is on CentOS 6, for

Am 20.03.2015 um 10:45 schrieb Volker Lendecke: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 05:47:11PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote: >>> Well the API is propably just stuffing blobs into extended >>> attributes directly from userspace. That's how most of >>> the NFSv4 ACLs usually get done :-(. >>> >>> Of course all implementations use different blobs containing

I have an NFS4 server exporting a folder, and a Samba server importing that folder which it then turns around and shares over Samba. I would like Windows machines accessing this folder and its sub folders to be properly restricted according to ACLs. The NFS4 server is running CentOS 5.7 and is NFS exporting an EXT4 folder. The Samba server is running CentOS 6.0, and Samba 3.5.4-68.el6_0.2. On the

Good morning! I'm reviewing some corporate storage setups involving NetApps, where the NetApp stores what they call "UNIX Qtrees". So far, so good: those allow the setting of access to the data with NFS4 ACL's, which are fairly sophisticated and allow multiple groups or even multiple users to be granted write access.or read access, besides the normal UNIX group owner. That works

I am looking for where zfsacl settings such as, zfsacl: acesort = dontcare , are documented. Do I need NFS settings such as, nfs4: mode = simple , if I am not using NFS? If I do, where are they documented? Thanks

Hi List, I'm interested in implementing nfs4 acl support for rsync. Are there any pointers to start? Is anybody else working on this? -- Peter Somogyi Gamax Kft Bartok Bela ut 15/D H-1114, Budapest, Hungary e-mail: psomogyi@gamax.hu phone: +36 1 382 5469

All test machines are CentOS 5.5 (RHEL subscriptions purchased). We've had NFS3 storage working fine and decided to try NFS4. We can mount an NFS4 share on our KVM host, but the SELinux file context on the mountpoint directory is magically changed from virt_image_t to nfs_t. Restorecon refuses to change it back. Adding the mount option context=system_u:object_r:virt_image_t on either server

G'day, I have a workstation running CentOS 5.8 with kernel 2.6.18-308.el5. This workstation needs to mount a NFS4 directory on a server (mysvr in the example below). If the computer is running the XEN kernel (uname -a reports ...2.6.18-308.el5xen), my NFS4 share is mounted but "ls" reports an error. Xen kernel: uname -a ...2.6.18-308.el5xen mount | grep mysvr

Hello, I have a CentOS 5.2 server that exports /home on the local network for 2 users by secure nfs4 with kerberos krb5p. The clients are a notebook and a desktop pc. The following error is always reproducible on all clients. If running the clients on high load, that means for example 5 firefox windows open and connected with www pages from the internet, installing the new qt development

Hi everyone, I'm sorry if this has already been covered somewhere, but I've had a look and can't find it. Also if there is a better place for this question, please let me know. I know that the CTDB documentation states that only NFS2/3 are supported with CTDB but what I'd really like to know is why NFS4 won't work and if NFS4 support is planned for the future (timeline?).