similar to: Loops

Hello: I am doing forward stepwise analysis on the glm model. I am trying to use model operator in the "upper" scope formula, for example, scope=list(lower=~1,upper=~ .^2) but the upper bound of the scope seems to be ignored and add1 is not performed at all, while if the terms are explicitly listed in the formula, the step function seems to work

Hi Olivier, Thanks for responding! I get to learn this way. On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:50, Olivier Meurant wrote: > Hi Garrison, > > I am not a specialist of the code but here is my 2 cents: > > - I like the idea that in lazy-mode the call (in module or not) is treated by a stub (like every calls). If we go further with this, I'll have to add test cases for lazy mode. I kind

In thinking about this we could use a Mutex::tryacquire(...) (non-recursive), around JIT::runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(...)'s while loop, and use your JITEmitter:: getLazyFunctionStub(...) suggestion in place of forceEmitFunctionStub(...). Is the lock attempt too heavy, even if it is implemented with atomics? I'll implement this when I have time. Garrison On Feb 17, 2010, at 15:42, Garrison

Dear Sir/Madam, Please allow me ask some things about share samba on CentOS 6.5 My case: data (excel file, linked file) of shared folder need security and not allow deleting except for owner and owning group, My testing configuration: + NTFS permision: chmod 3775 on shared folder, # chmod 3777 fa # ll total 8 drwxrwsrwt 2 fa1 fa 4096 Feb 2 12:41 fa + Samba permission:

Dear Sir/Madam, Please allow me ask some things about share samba on CentOS 6.5 My case: data (excel file, linked file) of shared folder need security and not allow deleting except for owner and owning group, My testing configuration: + NTFS permision: chmod 3775 on shared folder, # chmod 3777 fa # ll total 8 drwxrwsrwt 2 fa1 fa 4096 Feb 2 12:41 fa + Samba permission:

Hi Garrison, I am not a specialist of the code but here is my 2 cents: - I like the idea that in lazy-mode the call (in module or not) is treated by a stub (like every calls). - If the jit is in non-lazy mode, I'm not really fan of the "stub" solution. Is it not possible to use the same mechanism as it already exists : add the function to pending list and emit it after the current

The patch I recently attached to bug 2606, reproduced here, is my first attempt to solve this issue as represented by the attached test cases. To solve the foreign Module GlobalVariable problem, I modified JIT::getOrEmitGlobalVariable(...) to directly attempt to map a found "external" GlobalVariable. To solve the foreign Module Function problem, I modified both JIT.{h,cpp} and

Hola everyone, Solving this issue would be a huge time saver for analyzing my thesis data, so I'll try to be as concise as possible and hope that someone can give me a hand. I am trying to run a function that I created, which works fine until I try to use it with the by function. That function is listed at the bottom (f3) just in case that might be the issue. Essentially I have compiled a

I am sure there is a simple way to do the following, but i haven't been able to find it. I am hoping a merciful soul on R-help could point me in the right direction. I am doing a factor analysis on survey data with missing values. to do this, I run: FA1<-factanal(na.omit(DATA), factors = X, rotation = 'oblimin', scores = 'regression') Now that I have my factors and

When I try to adjust a mixed model with random effects I can make this order without problem > lm.FA<-lme(absFA~trait*condition,random=~1|individual) But if I try to fit a model in which the response (absFA) is not the same in all individuals at different levels of "trait" factor , but varies randomly from each. That is, this order >

I have a very strange problem accessing some files on a samba share that are in use from many windows7 client machines. I'm experiencing long timeouts: 5-30 seconds per file on very small xml files. The share is accessed by contemporary Windows7 machines at the time they are shut down. It seems to me that some of the files remain opened and locked to all other clients at server side while the

Hi LLVM list, Thanks for having me here. I'm writing my own debugger for my (secret) language... I don't know anything about LLVM beyond the general "big picture"... I haven't any real practical experience working with it... beyond just using XCode... So... really the problem is... I'm generating some functions... by "compiling to C"... so my compiler just

Dear Contributors, I am back asking for help concerning the same type of dataset I was asking before, in a previous help request. I needed to sum data over subsample of three time series each of them made of 100 observations. The solution proposed were various, among which: db<-p dim( db ) <- c(25,4,3) db2 <- apply(db, c(2,3), sum) db3 <- t(apply(db2, 1, function(poff)

Hi. Tue, 29 Dec 2015 23:25:24 +0900 (JST), HAT <hat at fa2.so-net.ne.jp>: > Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:24:17 +0100, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>: >> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:34:34AM +0900, HAT wrote: >>> In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed. >>> >>> $ rm test.txt >>> rm: test.txt: Resource busy >>>

Hello. Is NN for R for Win available? It seemes that there's no NN package in contributed ones. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20010310/6a58939c/attachment.html

Hi. Does anyone know whether CA(Cellular Automata), GA(Genetic Algorithm) or Multi-Agent System is available for R for Win? I've already knowna software for these areas, SWARM or startlogo. But I'd like to link R's function with these methods. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:24:17 +0100, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:34:34AM +0900, HAT wrote: >> In case of OS X 10.9 and later, any file could not be removed. >> >> $ rm test.txt >> rm: test.txt: Resource busy >> >> cannot remove: >> OS X 10.11.2 El Capitan >> OS X 10.10.5 Yosemite >> OS X 10.9.5

Greetings, all: I am using factanal in R. When I enter a matrix or a formula, the print method winds up with something like this: Test of the hypothesis that 6 factors are sufficient. The chi square statistic is 28.1 on 22 degrees of freedom. The p-value is 0.172 But when I enter a covmat, the print method winds up with something like this: The degrees of freedom for the model is 22 and the

Hello. I've dowloaded R-0.65.1 for WinNT/9X. >There is more support for (support of) ActiveX Automation via the >Rproxy.dll: see the file front-ends/readme. And where is this "the file front-ends/readme" which describes R's ActiveX Automation ? In "readme" under "r-install path\" and FAQ for Win port, no description about this. Please teach me.

Hello. I've dowloaded R-0.65.1 for WinNT/9X. >There is more support for (support of) ActiveX Automation via the >Rproxy.dll: see the file front-ends/readme. And where is this "the file front-ends/readme" which describes R's ActiveX Automation ? In "readme" under "r-install path\" and FAQ for Win port, no description about this. Please teach me.