similar to: how should I make the optional arguments in r?

Hi the list. Is there a bug in mmlcr package ? The following code does not compile: mmlcrTest <- function(dataW){ dataL <- reshape(dataW,idvar="id",timevar="T",varying=list("T0","T1","T2"),direction="long",v.names="score") resultR <- mmlcr(outer= ~ 1 | id, components = list(list(formula =

Hi All, In XCore backend, I saw “ …... EVT VT = Op.getValueType(); SDValue Data = DAG.getNode(XCoreISD::CRC8, DL, DAG.getVTList(VT, VT), Op.getOperand(1), Op.getOperand(2) , Op.getOperand(3)); SDValue Crc(Data.getNode(), 1); SDValue Results[] = { Crc, Data }; return DAG.getMergeValues(Results, 2, DL); “ which is used to lower an

Hi, I have posted to this list once before without any reply. It would be nice if some reply could indicate why the posting was not appropriate and some indication as to what one should do - the last time I included my smbconf. This time I have reworked my questions, limited their scope , and put them in two emails. I have two essentially identical linux computers [east and west] both running

Tks Cameron, I did some study on it. Now I am having the same problem as mentioned in this thread;"http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-January/057654.html” , > Looking at the X86 back-end code, it looks like there do exist > multi-output instructions, but they all use physical (implicit) registers > for the second destination, not arbitrary register types. And if I

hi, I thought it would be easy and over quickly - it has been anything but... I decided to test and use Samba 3.+ on my Suse linux pro 9.1 lan but cannot get it to work and need some help/guidance. I have two essentially identical linux computers [east and west] and I have both of them as both server AND client. At a later date, after this `simple' lan works, I plan to add a ms portable