similar to: [PATCH V8 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[PATCH V8 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive"

2013 Jan 21
6
[PATCH V6 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 21
6
[PATCH V6 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 25
4
[PATCH V7 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 25
4
[PATCH V7 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 18
3
[PATCH V5 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 18
3
[PATCH V5 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 11
2
[PATCH V4 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 11
2
[PATCH V4 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 08
3
[PATCH V3 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 08
3
[PATCH V3 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Sep 27
4
[PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure their own transmission steering strategy. So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support, there's
2013 Sep 27
4
[PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure their own transmission steering strategy. So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support, there's
2013 Sep 30
4
[net-next PATCH V2] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure their own transmission steering strategy. So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support, there's
2013 Sep 30
4
[net-next PATCH V2] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure their own transmission steering strategy. So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support, there's
2013 Nov 05
1
[RESEND PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing user to configure their own transmission steering strategy. So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support,
2013 Nov 05
1
[RESEND PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing user to configure their own transmission steering strategy. So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support,
2013 Jan 07
1
[PATCH V2 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As M.S.T mentioned, set affinity will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev at gmail.com> Cc: virtualization at
2013 Jan 07
1
[PATCH V2 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As M.S.T mentioned, set affinity will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev at gmail.com> Cc: virtualization at
2013 Sep 27
0
[PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 01:57:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue > mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and > loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure > their own transmission steering strategy. > > So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default
2013 Sep 30
0
[net-next PATCH V2] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue > mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and > loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure > their own transmission steering strategy. > > So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default