similar to: IPsec, VPN and FreeBSD

Is there a "cookbook" for setting this up? There are examples for setting up a tunnel between two fixed-address networks (e.g. a remote LAN that needs to be "integrated" with a central LAN over IPSec but I can't find anything addressing the other situation -- remote user(s) where the connecting IPs are not known in advance, such as a person with a laptop or smartphone in a

Hi Running racoon on a Freebsd-4.11 machine gives a kernel panic. I am using the racoon from ports directory which comes with the freebsd installation. Steps followed are as shown below: racoon -f /usr/local/etc/racoon/raccon.conf setkey -f ipsec.conf ping -c 1 <ip_of_the_other_gw> The ping will lead into a crash. The crash dump looks like for th ping packet it

Scenario: FreeBSD box running IPFW acting as a gateway to private network. The private network is made up of entirely routeable IP addresses. External users running Win2k and XP on DSL connections with dynamic IPs. Goal: To have the FreeBSD gateway securely authenticate and encrypt the traffic between the outside users and the internal network. I've spent the last 3 days running up and

Hi everyone, First of all, this is my first post in this ML, so I''m not sure that this is the right place for my question (please don''t shoot me down ;)). For the record, I''ve been reading and using LARTC for almost 3 years now, and it''s a great help for anyone who wants to learn linux networking. My problem: I want to setup a tunnel for the following

Hello Greg, I am writing you, because I saw your responses to a couple of messages on the freebsd-security mailing list related to freebsd vpn and nat. My situations is rather unique, and I am needing an expert's eyes to glance at it and confirm whether it is doable or not. I have a simple diagram that illustrates what I am trying to do, and it is located here (about 40k):

Buf ... Solved. Problem was that /etc/pam.d/racoon doesn't exists (I found this tip on NetBSD ipsec pages). Simply I have copied /etc/pam.d/passwd to /etc/pam.d/racoon and now all works as expected. Many thanks for your help Ross. Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > I think it might just use another one like /etc/pam.d/remote > cause I audited the package and it wasn't there.

Hi, I am new to ipsec and trying to connect my bsd server with win 2000. I have succeeded to tunnel using pre-shared key. But regarding certificate , I failed to get success. The following are configuration : racoon.conf path certificate "/usr/local/openssl/certs" ; # "log" specifies logging level. It is followed by either "notify",

I will shortly be replacing a couple of proprietary VPN boxes with a FreeBSD solution. Section 10.10 of the Handbook has a detailed description of how to do this. However I remember a lot of discussion about a year ago about whether the gif interface was necessary to set up VPNs like this or whether it was just a convenience, for "getting the routing right". A number of people said

I second Eero's comment, use a new IPSec daemon. Openswan was forked and became Libreswan. Paul, now a RH employee, was a main developer for the Openswan project before he and others created the Libreswan fork. https://libreswan.org/ EL6 has Openswan EL7 has Libreswan Racoon isn't all that fun to work with. If you have the option, ditch it and EL5 and move to a newer platform

Err. Sounds like security nightmare. 21.3.2016 7.47 ip. "Glenn Pierce" <glennpierce at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > Will ask my boss :) We are hosted on memset so not so easy to update > > Thanks > > On 21 March 2016 at 17:36, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi> wrote: > > Centos 5 is still soon end of life. Using it as ipsec gateway is .. > >

Centos 5 is still soon end of life. Using it as ipsec gateway is .. Eero 21.3.2016 7.25 ip. "Mike - st257" <silvertip257 at gmail.com> kirjoitti: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike - st257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I second Eero's comment, use a new IPSec daemon. > > > > Openswan was forked and became Libreswan. Paul, now

I set up an ipsec/racoon vpn tunnel test environment. The gateway machines are 192.168.0.30 and 192.168.0.31 on the external adaptor and 10.0.1.1 and 10.0.2.1 internally. The test workstations are 10.0.1.10 and 10.0.2.10. The tunnel seems to be working as in 10.0.1.10 can talk to 10.0.2.10 an vice versa and they can both use the net via NAT, however 192.168.0.30 and 192.168.0.31 cannot directly

Hi, When a IPSec tunnel is established between two peers, I understand that the "normal" situation is to have in a given moment two SAs, one for each direction of the tunnel. However, in one of my tunnels (peer P1 running GNU/Linux with setkey and racoon; peer P2 is a Cisco router) there is a large number (around 19) of SAs established (this has been observed in P1 with

Hi, I have tried to enable IPSec support for my FreeBSD( 4.11-RELEASE) system. First, I copied the generic kernel configuration file to a file I called MYKERNEL: #cp /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/MYKERNEL Then, I added the following three lines to the options section of /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/MYKERNEL: options IPSEC options IPSEC_ESP options

Hello everyone, I''m not sure whether to place my question here or in the racoon mailing list or even in that of iptables. I have created an ipsec connection with racoon in tunnel mode to another gateway to connect one subnet on each side to each other. This works fine. Only the ipsec gateway itself can''t send packages to the opposite subnet. Shorewall is configured according

Hi, I have setup a IPSEC VPN using Openswan to connect a Draytek router to a CentOS 5.2/Shorewall 4.2.9 firewall. The VPN establishes OK but I''m getting a problem with packets from the left hand subnet getting masqueraded rather than routed down the IPSEC VPN as though they were going out onto the net. I''ve spent the last day searching Google and so far I''ve hit a

I''ve created an IPSec VPN using shorewall and racoon-tool under Debian 3.1. I''m not using the patched iptables/kernel for policy match, therefore I''m using the tunnels/hosts config method rather than the ipsec config file method. I''m running the latest 2.6.13 kernel. I have no problem getting my VPN connection up and running with one exception. Without

Hi all: I ahve some basic questions regarding the mpd.conf: set radius retries 3 set radius timeout 3 set radius server 192.168.128.101 testing123 1812 1813 set radius me 1.1.1.1 set bundle enable radius-auth radius-fallback Here my radius server is 192.168.128.101 and interanl interface of this mpd server is 192.168.64.65 1) What is this "testing123"? is that key between radius

[ -netters, please Cc me or security@ with replies. ] I'm running into trouble integrating dynamic racoon-based IPSec into a network with ipfw and natd. I need to be able to allow VPN access from any address from authenticated clients. I've got the dynamic VPN working, with racoon negotiating SAs and installing SPs, but the problem is that I can't tell whether an incoming packet on

Hi, I am trying to configure ipsec on asterisk. Have configured /etc/racoon/racoon.conf and /etc/raccoon/psk.txt. Also have policy file in same folder. Have run racoon. Still I can't receive calls. Can anyone please tell if any extra step is needed. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: