similar to: Build Opus on Windows

Hello, I am interested in porting OPUS to an embedded platform. The idea is that the encoder and decoder will run on different processors. In order to choose the proper platform, I need an estimate of the resources which are needed for OPUS. I read the following in the OPUS wiki: "The Opus code base is written in C89 and should run on the vast majority of recent (and not so recent) CPUs.

Hello, I am testing the command line based opus encoder/decoder tools and I have some questions regarding the information given by the encoder (see below as an example). Encoding using libopus 1.0.2 (audio) ----------------------------------------------------- Input: 48kHz 1 channel Output: 1 channel (1 uncoupled) 20ms packets, 64kbit/sec VBR Preskip: 312 Encoding complete

The e-mail sent to you contained an attachment with a not allowed filetype. Please inform the sender to pack this type of attachment into a password protected ZIP-archive. Eine an Sie gesendete E-Mail enthielt einen nicht erlaubten Dateianhang. Bitte informieren Sie den Absender, diese Art von Anhang kann nur als Passwort gesch?tztes ZIP-Archiv versendet werden. Details: Sender:

Hello All, We have been doing an optimised port of OPUS to a ARM Cortex A9. We are currently measuring between 20 and 90 MCPS for our code running on a Panda board (single core), this covers all bit-rates,sample rates for stereo coding (encode + decode) under normal operation. As Marc says complexity can be controlled via the API with our higher figure corresponding to the default setting of

Hi all, I am interested in using the OPUS codec for real-time application on an (preferable low-profile) platform. In order to choose the optimal processor (memory size, speed,...) I have the following questions: - We have compiled OPUS on a PC with Linux OS and on a dual-core Cortex A9 with Linux Kernel. Can OPUS run on a processor with no specific OS, or are there

Hi All, I'm wondering about saving audio to a file. With MP3 & WMA there's support for tags - is there a file format for Opus with tag support? I guess I've missed something somewhere. Opus is excellent BTW, I use it in client/server radio communications software, http://v2.sdr-radio.com/ . Simon G4ELI/HB9DRV http://dit-dit-dit.com -------------- next part

Dear Christian van Bijleveld, You can use any of the below DSPs of Texas Instruments 1. TMS320C674x - This supports floating point implementation of opus 2. TMS320C66x - This supports both floating and fixed point implementations 3. TMS320C64x - This supports only fixed point implementation Regards, Mahantesh On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:12 PM, <opus-request at xiph.org> wrote: >

I have been challenged by someone that opusfile's 48kHz most of the time forced resampling but I didn't have good arguments to counter. I've checked the opus-codec.org pages and Monty's pages without finding good arguments. If you encode files to .opus with opusenc and decode with opusfile's api the sampling rate is constantly 48kHz ignoring output hardware isn't it? Is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, We just released Opus 1.1-beta and Monty wrote a nice demo showing off all the new features, including many improvements over the alpha release: http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/opus/demo3.shtml As usual, the code can be downloaded from: http://opus-codec.org/downloads/ In addition to 1.1-beta, we also released 1.0.3, which includes a

Hi All, As I've said before, Opus is excellent. I use it to reduce network load when running a remote radio, the encoding improvements in 1.1 are very impressive. I downloaded and compiled 1.1 (VS2010) but can't find the 1.1 API changes - maybe I'm just being extra-thick this morning J . Simon GD4ELI/HB9DRV http://v2.sdr-radio.com/ -------------- next part

Hello, We've been using Opus for VoIP calls in Jitsi and we're very happy with the sound quality it provides. Thank you for the great work! We are thinking of updating to 1.1-beta and wanted to know if there's any reason not to do so at this point, and wait for the 1.1 release instead. Is the beta expected to be as stable as the 1.0.x series, or are there any known flaws still to

Hi, a first set of results can be downloaded here <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/wiki/TestingResults> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/wiki/TestingResults More will be added soon. Thanks to Patrick Schreiner and Alfons Martin, who did the tests. With best regards, Christian Hoene Symonics GmbH Sand 13 72076 T?bingen Tel +49 7071 5681302

On Jan 20, 2013, at 10:18 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Sorry, I wasn't trying to suggest anything vague, but rather refer to my previous (perhaps ill founded) understanding about the expected path forward for LLD. Anyways, I'll explain in a bit more detail so we can talk about the concrete issue. > > My concrete hope is that LLD migrates toward the coding standards that are

I'm in the process of writing a library and giving a talk about writing compilers using LLVM (llvm-c) and Clojure. As part of my talk I'd like to give an example of a program running on CUDA. Are there any papers, tutorials, examples, on writing a custom frontend for NVPTX? For instance, I'm trying to figure out how to get access to "global" variables like blockidx. I know

What I'm trying to achieve is that a voicemail message should be at least 3 seconds long for it to be saved, but *after that* a prolonged silence (e.g. 10 seconds) should terminate the call and recording. My current settings (Asterisk 10.7.0 and 11.2.1) are: ; Minimum length of a voicemail message in seconds for the message to be kept ; The default is no minimum. minsecs=3 ;

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > On Jan 20, 2013, at 10:18 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > Sorry, I wasn't trying to suggest anything vague, but rather refer to my > previous (perhaps ill founded) understanding about the expected path > forward for LLD. Anyways, I'll explain in a bit more detail so we can talk > about

Hi, I have an issue with Samba using winbind. We have Active Directory groups with underscores (for example sambagroup_underscore). But an underscore in Samba (Unix) is a space in Active Directory. So my question is what character is used in Samba (Unix) for an underscore in Active Directory? Or are there other solutions to solve this? I would be very happy if you can help me! Met

Greetings. I'm not sure if this is the place or not, but I wanted to pass on this patch (against CVS as of today) to document two exit values that are used by rsync but not yet in the docs. Please let me know if there's a better place to send it. Many thanks to the developers and maintainers of rsync for all the excellent work! Jon Index: rsync.yo

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2013, at 1:55 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > We're looking more at doing some serious hacking on LLD, and I'd like to > avoid doing lots of work in the codebase only to change the style around > later. > > > > My understanding was that LLD was always intended to

I use the Opus multistream encoder for both mono and stereo encodings and after updating from 1.1.3 to 1.3 I noticed the size of the produced Opus files had doubled for 1-channel encodings whereas switching to the standand Opus encoder gave me roughly the same sizes as before. In these tests, I'm encoding an 8kHz mono stream containing only speech with the following options set: frame length