similar to: NSD remote control batch utility in PERL

Dear all, NSD 4.11.0 is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.11.0.tar.gz sha256 93956d90d45ffa9f84f8ca2f718a42105e4236d094ce032211849f1a12cdc158 pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.11.0.tar.gz.asc Version 4.11.0 sees various small features and bugfixes. One notable feature is that configuration can be reloaded and evaluated on SIGHUP, when enabled with the new

Dear all, NSD 4.11.0rc1 pre-release is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.11.0rc1.tar.gz sha256 7594d014199585c24f6593649bfc657078d411a3f09eb31192a35a7c031c028f pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.11.0rc1.tar.gz.asc Version 4.11.0rc1 sees various small features and bugfixes. One notable feature is that configuration can be reloaded and evaluated on SIGHUP, when

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 17:02:09 +0100 richard lucassen via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > The problem is (was) that I used "include:" statements in nsd.conf > to load zone information. Apparently nsd does not reread the include > files upon a SIGHUP. I scripted everything into 1 file and a HUP > rereads the zone info now. Wrong, I made a mistake it

Dear all, We have an emergency quick-fix release, version 4.11.1 for NSD. NSD 4.11.1 is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.11.1.tar.gz sha256 696e50052008de4fa7ab1d818d5b77eb63247eea2f0575114c9592ff9188a614 pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.11.1.tar.gz.asc NSD version 4.11.0 had a serious bug in which applying updates to zones (and other modifications that require a

Hi, I'm new to NSD and would really appreciate if someone can point me to the right direction. I have like 8 NSD servers (secondary) serving around 30,000 zones. Zone updates are transferred from the primary DNS servers by AXFR/IXFR. The 8 NSD servers do not save the zones file on disk but are only held in memory. Therefore after NSD service is restarted zone transfer requests are being

Hi, I'm doing some quick tests with nsd-4.0.0b5 and (rc2). And found something strange when changing (nsd-control reconfig) one zone from: zone: name: 10.in-addr.arpa zonefile: /zones/empty.zone to zone: name: 10.in-addr.arpa request-xfr: 192.168.122.12 NOKEY allow-notify: 192.168.122.12 NOKEY zonefile: /zones/slave/10.rev and doing nsd-control reconfig. After

Rick, My apologies :) zongo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [nsd-users] nsd can't bind udp socket: Address already in use Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:33:20 +0200 From: Rick van Rein (OpenFortress) <rick at openfortress.nl> To: zongo saiba <zongosaiba at gmail.com> zongo, you only sent this to me? -rick On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:04 PM, zongo saiba

Can nsd 2.3.3 make load balancing? Example: www 600 IN A 10.0.0.1 600 IN A 10.0.0.2 600 IN A 10.0.0.3 Greet Sebastian Schikora

Hi, NSD 4.8.0rc1 pre-release is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.8.0rc1.tar.gz sha256 64f1da8f8163340f9d3b352ef8819e3c72c951fdd87cff55dc3b6a6b1ea27942 pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.8.0rc1.tar.gz.asc This release introduces PROXYv2 support and faster statistics gathering, removes the database option and fixes bugs. The proxy protocol support is an implementation

Hi Jannik, What's the rationale behind the "--enable-prometheus-metrics" compile-time option? If this code were compiled by default, would it do any harm? The reason I'm asking this is that features that can be enabled/disabled at compile-time make package distribution complicated. It can result in a scenario where NSD packages on different operating systems or distributions

Hello I have this problem since a week or so: The nsd daemon crashes unexpectedly and the nsd log files shows this: [1200299533] nsd[3736]: info: XSTATS 1200299533 1200298484 RR=0 RNXD=0 RFwdR=0 RDupR=0 RFail=0 RFErr=0 RErr=0 RAXFR=0 RLame=0 ROpts=0 SSysQ=0 SAns=40 SFwdQ=0 SDupQ=0 SErr=0 RQ=37 RIQ=0 RFwdQ=0 RDupQ=0 RTCP=0 SFwdR=0 SFail=30 SFErr=0 SNaAns=0 SNXD=0 RUQ=0 RURQ=0 RUXFR=0 RUUpd=1

Hello, It seems our NSD secondary has triggered some sort of intermittent bug After several weeks/months of running nsd stops forking with the new zone data. A manual nsd-control transfer or even nsd-control force_transfer won?t work, only restart of nsd solves the problem. The only ?hint? I?ve found is that the nsd xfrd messages stops appearing in the logs (while the notify messages keeps

Hi Jean Claude, The message is printed when the bind operation failed. Why that happens is hard to say, I'd need more information for that. As the message does not say: address already in use (or similar), I'm guessing the address is not configured? Best regards, Jeroen On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 18:03 +0200, HAKIZIMANA Jean Claude via nsd-users wrote: > Dear nsd Users, > kindly can

This release is an alpha release. We are currently not planning to have a 1.4.0 stable release as we want to prioritize implementing DNSSEC first. The next stable release will then be NSD 2.0.0 with DNSSEC support. This release has some major changes: the database format is much more compact, responses are generated on-the-fly instead of being precompiled in the database, and the new

Robert Blayzor via nsd-users writes: > > NSD doesn't understand the GENERATE directive. You'll have to create > > your zone files using a script or template engine. > Understood but certainly not helpful with large dynamic IPv6 PTR's... > Not that dynamic hosts NEED PTR's, but would still be nice to have. lex(1) is your friend. For managing our reverse ip6

Hi there! I remember reading that you cannot reload new zone files on the fly and require a full restart of the nsd daemon? We are evaluating multiple DNS servers that have better performance comparing to bind, but will require quite heavy zone reload (new and existing) every 10 minutes or so. Downtime (even 1-3 secs) is not the option. Thanks!

Hi Andreas, The suggestions I captured in GitHub issues. Thanks for sharing. Regarding whether notifies are still plain UDP. Yes, the config parser doesn't accept additional arguments to "notify" and judging by the xfrd code anything to do with notify is using UDP, so no TLS yet. I've added a GitHub issue for this too. Thanks for the suggestions. They make for nice

People are proposing rate-limiting built into BIND, to defend against some DoS attackes (a proposal <http://fanf.livejournal.com/122111.html> and its implementation <https://github.com/fanf2/bind-9/blob/master/doc/misc/ratelimiting>). What is the current thinking for NSD? (It is a truly open question, do not take it as "this guy requires rate-limiting in NSD".)

Hello, This topic has been discussed at least a couple of times in the past, but is there currently any way to make NSD ignore out-of-zone data or other errors in the zones or make NSD skip invalid zones? At least with NSD 3.2.16 or earlier any such errors cause NSD rebuild fail and thus prevent NSD from restarting. This is especially problematic in environments where NSD acts as a slave server

Hello NSD users, I've updated the NSD port in the MacPorts tree to version 3.2.1, so that MacPorts users on OS X can install it with a simple "port install nsd" command. The port has two variants, viz. "stats" and "rootserver". Note that after installing the port, one still needs to copy PORTBASE/etc/nsd/nsd.conf.sample to PORTBASE/etc/nsd/nsd.conf and customise