similar to: Multiple default gateways. Unable to ping other hosts.

Hi. I´m making an script for load balancing of two cablemodems internet connections toward my LAN. The problem is that when I try to ''equalize'' the the two internet connections with the weight=1 it doesn´t work. On the other hand, if I put 5 and 5 it works, but not at 100%, it does intermittlently, some times works and others don´t. example: ip route add default equalize\

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Vonau" <jvonau@shaw.ca> To: "Mailing List for Shorewall Users" <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 08:06 Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Two Links and DNAT > > > > Btw, by "shorewall show nat" I just noticed that I was doing snat only > > for packets comming

I have a simple script: #!/bin/bash # index=0 total=0 names=() ip=() while read -r LINE do NODENAME=` echo $LINE | cut -f 1 -d ','` IP=` echo $LINE | cut -f 2 -d ','` names[index]="$NODENAME" ip[index]="$IP" index=`expr index+1` total=`expr total+1` done <<< $(cat list.txt) simple file: more list.txt name1,ip1 name2,ip2 name3,ip3 output when

Hi All, I''m a big user of the LARTC document but am currently stuck with a question around section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) in relation to "Routing for multiple uplinks/providers". I''m wanting to do a similar setup to the diagram where I have - lets just say for the moment - two uplink providers where I want to route over two

Dear All. I want to use 'not' for 2 addresses (for both) in ipfw2 rule. The only way that looks like what I need is # ipfw add count from IP1 to not IP2,IP3 But does this rule indeed makes what I want? Does it count all packets destined to addresses other then IP2 AND IP3?! No other syntax works. For example more logically correct not IP2 AND not IP3 or even not { IP2 or IP3 } are

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |

hy Hope everyone is fine, I have one issue coming in asterisk , What i am doing is i am generating a callback if some one calls at a specif access number on asterisk, Asterisk sends a busy signal to the calling party that he received a request from party and then sends the call back to the person from where asterisk received a request but in From field as you can see below astrisk is sending the

Hi Everybody in the list I have a situation like this ------ (IP1) linux |----eth0.40------ | router | | | box | (IP2) |------|Client Router ( Destiantion Net DNET) |----eth0.41------ | | /27 subnet ------ I just want to balance the load of bandwidth per packet based between the two vlan interfaces to Client Destination network

Hello Im having a problem similar to sawar Here is my configuration --------------eth1---192.168.1.128---------- -------------192.168.1.1 ISP router 1 | my | ---Eth0---192.168.10.157----| | | linux |

Hello all, I have a linux router with 2 interfaces(eth0 - ISP and eth1 - LAN). I''ve established a VPN connection(openvpn) over eth0 with a friend of mine => tun0 interface. I want half of my LAN to have Internet access through the eth0 interface and the other half through the tun0 interface. I''ve set up a script like the "load balancing split access" instructions

I need to set up following network architecture : Internet ^ +-----------------+ | +------------------+ | Centos6-1 | | | Centos6-2 | | +---- eth0 + ----+ | | | (br0)| | | | | +---- eth1 +----------------+

Hello I have a PC with 2 IPs publics IP1 in eth0 and IP2 in eth0:0 I want to do a redirection of IP2 to an other public IP IP3 in an other laptop (other network) - for all ports : IP2 ---> IP3 - for juste www : IP2:www --> IP3:www i tried many combination with shorewall-3.0.7-4, but no sucess no help from google, Thanks in advance Laurent

HI All , I am running a FC6 box with two internet links with load balance . Every thing is working fine expect the MSN connection that failed and reconnect every time and SSL connections . I would link to know if with the nona howto I could fix that . I have been tried with no success to redirect that connection only to one link but its look like do not work . Here my configuration :

Hi, this might be a dumb question, but I''m not finding much information online. I''m trying to setup a 2.6 linux box to run nat across multiple upstream links as a simple way to aggregate bandwidth. I found the instructions in lartc section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) fairly clear and straightforward. I implemented those, and a couple of trivial

Hi, At office, we have I ISPs. I want to lightly monitor each link latency in order to decide several routing. For that, I have only one external server: 1 IP, it's an OVH dedicated server. The quick picture is http://s24.postimg.org/n3436z64l/defaul_route.png Default route is via ISP1. If OVH-server pings IP1: - the request will go through ISP1: it's OK - the reply will go through

from ip1=192.168.222.96 and ip2=192.168.22.96 user zvn2 receive test in list, hosts allow = 192.168.222.96 in config for share test and global access based share enum = Yes, but I need share test in list only from ip1=192.168.222.96 when ip1=192.168.222.96 $ smbclient -L 192.168.22.135 --use-kerberos=off -U zvn2%pppppppp -W . ?? ?Sharename?????? Type????? Comment ?? ?---------??????

Hi all, is there a way to combine iptables parameters like: iptables -A OUTPUT -p UDP & -p TCP -d $IP1 & -d $IP2 ? Best Regards Marcus

Am 29.07.24 um 14:35 schrieb Zhuchenko Valery via samba: > user may be same, but from client ip1 this user can't see shares, which > can see from client ip2. > need share enumeration by client ip Have you checked if "hosts allow" in combination with "access based share enum" does what you want?

Hello, I am making a HTB script for a few people and I wanted to ask a question. Now I have a nice script with this hierarchy of classes. root(128/128) +---WWW(32/128) +---Default(32/128) +---P2P(1/64) #P2P Programs like DC and Kazza +---.... How should I implement limiting the speed of some users (by IP addresses)? I had an idea, but it looks too compicated. What do you think?

I''m using Debian (sarge) I do now have 2 ISP, one DSL and one cabel. I want to use the DSL as my primary and only use the cabel-modem if the DSL fails. The setup is: IP1 -> Router -> NAT_IP1 -> eth0 -> eth2 (LAN) IP2 -> Cable-Modem -> eth1 -> eth2 (LAN) I wrote the following in my /etc/iproute2/rt_tables ip rule add from NAT_IP1 lookup 1 ip route add