similar to: [PATCH V5 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[PATCH V5 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive"

2013 Jan 21
6
[PATCH V6 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 21
6
[PATCH V6 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 25
4
[PATCH V7 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 25
4
[PATCH V7 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Sep 27
4
[PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure their own transmission steering strategy. So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support, there's
2013 Sep 27
4
[PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure their own transmission steering strategy. So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support, there's
2013 Jan 25
5
[PATCH V8 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 25
5
[PATCH V8 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 11
2
[PATCH V4 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 11
2
[PATCH V4 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Sep 30
4
[net-next PATCH V2] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure their own transmission steering strategy. So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support, there's
2013 Sep 30
4
[net-next PATCH V2] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure their own transmission steering strategy. So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support, there's
2013 Jan 08
3
[PATCH V3 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Jan 08
3
[PATCH V3 1/2] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug. Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason
2013 Nov 05
1
[RESEND PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing user to configure their own transmission steering strategy. So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support,
2013 Nov 05
1
[RESEND PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing user to configure their own transmission steering strategy. So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default mapping when the number of cpus is equal to the number of queues. With XPS support,
2013 Sep 27
0
[PATCH net-next] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 01:57:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue > mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and > loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure > their own transmission steering strategy. > > So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default
2013 Sep 30
0
[net-next PATCH V2] virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue > mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and > loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure > their own transmission steering strategy. > > So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a default
2019 Dec 23
0
[RHEL7]virtio-net: switch to use XPS to choose txq
On 2019/12/20 ??7:48, Cindylu wrote: > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769479 > Upstream Status: 9bb8ca86075f37d3c169b9c46f8e7c6d3165e18f > Brew: ?https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/taskinfo?taskID=25482050 > Tested: verified by customer > > commit 9bb8ca86075f37d3c169b9c46f8e7c6d3165e18f > Author: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > Date: Tue
2013 May 16
2
[PATCH] virtio-net: Reporting traffic queue distribution statistics through ethtool
This patch allows virtio-net driver to report traffic distribution to inbound/outbound queues through ethtool -S. The per_cpu virtnet_stats is split into receive and transmit stats and are maintained on a per receive_queue and send_queue basis. virtnet_stats() is modified to aggregate interface level statistics from per-queue statistics. Sample output below: NIC statistics: rxq0: