similar to: Ruby vulnerability?

Please, note: http://secunia.com/advisories/23115/ A port maintainer CC'ed. -- Dixi. Sem.

Hi! Since linux-flashplugin7 r63 is vulnerable according to http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/7c75d48c-429b-11db-afae-000c6ec775d9.html isn't www/linux-seamonkey vulerable, too (it seems to include 7 r25)? Bye Arne __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Colin, good day! Spotted two patches for x11-servers/xorg-server port: see entries for x11r6.9.0-dbe-render.diff and x11r6.9.0-cidfonts.diff at http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/X11R6.9.0/patches/index.html Seems like they are not applied to the xorg-server-6.9.0_5. May be it should be added to the VuXML document? There is a ports/107733 issue that incorporates these patches. May be you

Hi, I'm having trouble getting an answer to the following problem on -questions - I hope someone here has done something similar and can help. I'd like to compile support for FreeBSD OPIE into sshd. Presently I have to use PAM to achieve one-time password support. On a 4.x system I have in /etc/ssh/sshd_config ChallengeResponseAuthentication yes and in /etc/pam.conf sshd auth

Zitat von Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: Hi Remko, > Emails can only be read if they are authenticated / authorized in > someway to access the store. That means you might need to share the > info@ credentials with the other > people so that they can read it over imap or webmail etc. That is self-evident and it is not a problem. I can't understand what you

Old Synopsis: portaudit doesn't report about all security bugs New Synopsis: security/portaudit doesn't report about all security bugs Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-security Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 29 21:37:38 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=84312

Hello Everyone! It has been my pleasure and privilege to serve as the FreeBSD Security Officer for the past 3+ years. With the crucial support of the FreeBSD Security Team members, a lot has been accomplished: hundreds of security issues have been researched and tracked, with some resulting in security advisories and patches; software in the Ports Collection are updated more quickly

...Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015" http://www.freshports.org/net/samba3/ ============================================================================ samba3 3.0.26a_2,1 <http://www.freshports.org/net/>net<http://www.freshports.org/faq.php#watchlistcount> <http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=depends_all&method=match&query=net/samba3>=220 FORBIDDEN:

Hello, My company has been asked to help with the upgrade of several Freebsd systems that are pretty old. The customer is running a file server samba also running apache running FBSD 4.2, he wants to upgrade using cvsup & the make buildworld procedure to upgrade to 5.x. Im very familier with the make buildworld procedure however there have been significant changes between 4.2 & 5.x so is

Howyd all? Seems that I have been routed. Possibly by a physical B&E, but who knows? Probably some of you do.... anyways, some politically sensitive email was deleted from a user account and the line low -tr & inserted into my .xinitrc . Duncan (Dhu) Campbell

Still not quite right for me. Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync(lightning.reub.net): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds (last sent=mail, last recv=mail (EOL)) Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: Timeout during state=sync_mails (send=mails recv=recv_last_common) I'm not sure if there is an underlying replication error

Hi, I've been trying for the past few days to come up with a method for checking a FreeBSD system to see if it is vulnerable to an issue described by a FreeBSD security advisory in some automated way, similar to the way portaudit can use VuXML to check for vulnerabilities in ports. Right now, I'm a bit stuck--there seem to be fairly major issues with all the methods I've come up

er.... How to block Arp PAckages? []s

> On 16 Sep 2015, at 19:10, Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org> wrote: > > Does the Dovecot NTLM mechanism work with MS Outlook? > > [ ] YES > [ ] NO > > Please check one ... anybody. > > ?Mark The URL on the wiki, which had probably been shared before with you; http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ActiveDirectoryNtlm suggests it does. The URL quotes: Step 5.

I think, there is a neat exploit in the phpbb2.0.8 because I found my home page defaced one dark morning. The patch for phpBB is here. http://www.phpbb.com/downloads.php The excerpt of the log is attached. I believe the link to the described exploit is here. http://secunia.com/advisories/13239 The defacement braggen page is here filter to show the exploited FreeBSD machines that aneurysm.inc

I am running Dovecot 2.2.15 on Linux Slackware 14.1 and Samba 4.1.17 as the Active Directory/Domain Controller on the same host as Dovecot. Sendmail/procmail delivers mail to users' $HOME/Maildir. MS Outlook/IMAP is the client MTU used to connect with Dovecot to read mail on the Users' WIN7 workstations. I believe I have confirmed that MS Outlook will either ... 1) send the userid and

In my recent security email, I got the following errors: cantona.dnswatchdog.com login failures: Aug 20 02:37:19 cantona sshd[9444]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted Aug 20 04:30:42 cantona sshd[16142]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted Aug 20 21:21:51 cantona sshd[45716]: fatal: Write failed: Operation not permitted So three questions: What is it? Should I be worried?

Hi list! I have an account (let's say info at mydomain.com) that should be read from more people. These people does NOT have an account on the server. Currently info at mydomain.com is a forward to their addresses, but of course this solution has a huge problem: if info@ receives spam that the server does not recognize, the server forwards spam... Now I want to solve this problem and I

>> auth: in openpam_parse_chain(): /etc/pam.d/dovecot(1): missing or invalid facility > > I do not think that it has something to do with the dovecot settings > itself but perhaps with the pam facility settings instead? i can believe that. any clues to debug? randy

Quoting "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml at o-sinc.com>: > You are not alone! > > On Wednesday, July 06, 2016 01:15:34 PM Remko Lodder wrote: >> Dear list, >> >> I have setup a master-master replication setup. My primairy MX's send >> email >> over on a DNS loadbalanced way, so DNS is doing some kind of round-robin >> way of sending