similar to: UDP connection attempts

Dear all, I am facing a peculiar situation: on my smb.conf log level = 5, and on my windows machine I log on as a local administrator to add remote desktop users that are in fact domain users. When my worgroup = SOMETHING, everything works fine. When I change my worgroup to: workgroup = example.com, and try to add a new remote desktop user, and set as an object name example.com\user and try

Hi all, I am trying to setup a mail server using postfix (virtual_mailboxes), spamassassin and dovecot, along with SQL where appropriate. From my research so far I realized that, for several reasons, it is required for me to use dovecot LDA instead of maildrop, local, procmail or other alternatives. My configuration was working flawlessly, until spamassassin per-user configuration came to

Hello all, I've got an old server running SAMBA 3.3.0. I've some shares on it. All shares looks like this : [partinfo] path=/shares/partinfo valid users = +info force user = %U force group = info read only = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 All works perfectly : When I create a file on this share other users in the info group can modify it but nobody can delete it

do i need to provide more information? On 19/10/2016 14:49, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > /var/log/maillog showed this > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/smtpd[1298]: 7599A2C19C6: > client=unknown[127.0.0.1] > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/cleanup[1085]: 7599A2C19C6: > message-id=<edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk> > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/qmgr[1059]:

is there something more i need to be doing my end? On 25/10/2016 09:11, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > are there any instructions or tests i can make to check the sieve > configuration? or does the magic all happen internally and there are > no settings to change? > > On 21/10/2016 10:22, Matthew Broadhead wrote: >> the server is using CentOS 7 and that is the package that

the server is using CentOS 7 and that is the package that comes through yum. everything is up to date. i am hesitant to install a new package manually as that could cause other compatibility issues? is there another way to test the configuration on the server? On 21/10/2016 01:07, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 10/20/2016 om 7:38 PM schreef Matthew Broadhead: >> do i need to provide

Hi: I have a Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Ed. as Domain controller, an its current domain functional level is 'Windows Server 2003'. Also, I have a RedHat Linux 7.3 server with SaMBa (tested with rpm samba-3.0.0-2, and compiling the samba source code). I'd joined the linux server to the AD tree without problems, access from it to the Win2003 shared resources too, but I have

I am trying to install Firewalld. I am using CENTOS 7. Please help me to solve the error. [root at ns1 httpd]# systemctl enable firewalld [root at ns1 httpd]# systemctl start firewalld [root at ns1 httpd]# systemctl status firewalld firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled) Active: inactive (dead) since Thu

Now I am following you. FYI [root at ns1 network-scripts]# systemctl start firewalld [root at ns1 network-scripts]# systemctl status firewalld firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled) Active: inactive (dead) since Wed 2015-11-25 17:20:14 SGT; 24s ago Process: 2865 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/firewalld --nofork

Hello, I'm using Postfix with virtual domains (MySQL), Dovecot 1.0beta7 and CVS LDA. I've set up postfix to use the LDA for maildir delivery and defined a global sieve script. -- master.cf -- ... dovecot unix - n n - - pipe flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient} ... -- main.cf -- smtpd_banner =

Samba organizers might want to look into this: [ns1:~] dig 150.73.70.66.relays.osirusoft.com ; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> 150.73.70.66.relays.osirusoft.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28005 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 13 ;; QUESTION SECTION:

greetings on a simple CentOS 4 DNS server install i have the below info. crontab -l "shows nothing" pico /etc/crontab shows... SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin MAILTO=root HOME=/ # run-parts 01 * * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.hourly 02 4 * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.daily 22 4 * * 0 root run-parts /etc/cron.weekly 42 4 1 * * root run-parts /etc/cron.monthly i

I have an operational need to disable TLSv1.3 due to inadequate support to exclude certain ciphers. Much to my dismay, the `ssl_protocols` had been renamed and re-functionalized into `ssl_min_protocol`. Now, there is no way to exclude a specific group of one or more TLS versions. For a new bug report, I think we need two new settings: * `ssl_tls13_ciphersuite` and * `ssl_tls10_cipher`

Dear All I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading , google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve the issue. My named.conf looks as below. * * * // named.conf // // Provided by Red Hat bind package to configure the ISC BIND named(8) DNS // server as a caching only

I have an operational need to disable TLSv1.3 due to inadequate support to exclude certain ciphers. Much to my dismay, the `ssl_protocols` had been renamed and re-functionalized into `ssl_min_protocol`. Now, there is no way to exclude a specific group of one or more TLS versions. For a new bug report, I think we need two new settings: * `ssl_tls13_ciphersuite` and * `ssl_tls10_cipher`

I don''t know what has happened because know I can''t even get this guest booting. The guest conf I think is correct: kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-8.1.4.el5xen" builder=''linux'' memory = 384 name = "ns1" vcpus = 1 #vif = [ ''mac=FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF , ip=139.185.48.214, ''bridge=xenbr1'' ] vif = [ '''',

I'm a bit baffled by this and I'm looking for ideas... background: two DNS servers (ns1 & ns2)(64bit CentOS 5.8) one email server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & postfix 2.3.3) one nagios server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & nagios 3.3.1) situation: - all servers configured to use both DNS servers for lookups - ns1 server down for hardware problem - nagios alerts that smtp on email server taking

Hello all, I am trying to match some conections using u32 but I tryed this: [root@ns1 ~]# tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src 0/0 match ip dst 0/0 match ip sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel [root@ns1 ~]# I have this class at device eth1: [root@ns1 ~]# tc class show dev eth1 class

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 07:55:05AM +0000, Philipp Schafft wrote: > Why does Icecast forward both requests? Very simple: Not all auth setups > require username:password. E.g. some are only for logging and > accounting. Some auth using the IP address, which is already known in > the first request. Indeed. One of my streams has requested geoblocking, which uses exactly the mechanism you

Dear R users, I am trying to do the forest plot follow the function given on web. However, the order of the tests has been sorted alphabetically. I would prefer keeping the order as data frame input so that I can group and compare (from the graph) the target immune NS1, IgG and IgM (where SD, BioRad, Pb etc are the brand names) > d x y ylo yhi SD.NS1