similar to: DNS updates working Windows only

Hi, I'm still running samba4 beta5 with dns-backend=BIND9_FLATFILE I want to upgrade to samba4 rc5. Can I still use BIND9_FLATFILE ? Best regards, Bruno Fernandes

To get the automount schema to work with the git checkout of samba 4 I had to modify the automount schema files and separate the attributes from the classes. I also discovered that it's required to have the ntSecurityDescriptor , instanceType, and objectCategory attributes. Without these it will crash whenever you try to browse... I did alot of stopping samba, tarring of /usr/local/samba and

Dear all, I have a few question regarding to DNS and upgrading from Samba 4.1.17 to 4.4.2. After reading about the Badlock Bug, I feel the urge to upgrade my Samba installation and to move from BIND9_FLATFILE to SAMBA_INTERNAL_DNS. I am using Samba version 4.1.17. During provisioning (some years ago) I have decided to use BIND9_FLATFILE. At this moment I would like to upgrade to Samba 4.4.2 and

yes i realized that there is something wrong with BIND9_FLATFILE while encountering with samba_upgradedns -h which doesn't show BIND9_FLATFILE Any help on*drs repl* not working i think it is pointing to wrong FQDN how do i correct that ? > >/ Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) > />/ > />/ > />/ [root at dc2

I am planning up upgrading my AD/DC from Samba version 4.8.2 to the most recent version in my Slackware distro which is currently 4.15.13. In previous threads in this maillist I was advised that the best route to achieve this was to add a 2nd domain controller, then promote that one and demote the original. I'm in the process of setting up a 2nd DC to that end. I thought I ask questions as I

Hi, I'm curious about this remark on the wiki[1] : "do NOT use NONE as the DNS backend, it is not supported and will be removed in a future Samba version." Why is this being removed? I would prefer to manually add the records that would be generated by BIND9_FLATFILE to my domain's zone file. We have automation that controls records in the domain's zone file that I

Hello Together Please i have here a little company with any exisiting internal DNS Server "BIND 9.11.5-P4-5.1-Debian (Extended Support Version) <id:998753c>" Today i compilled the release Samba 4.10.7 successfully on any new machine here..... i read on Samba org the following News. - Do not use the BIND9_FLATFILE DNS back end. It is not supported and will be removed

Hi! Have you read? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory#Preparing_the_Host_for_Joining_the_Domain Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu no dia domingo, 16/07/2023 ?(s) 07:23: > I am planning up upgrading my AD/DC from Samba version 4.8.2 to the most > recent > version in my Slackware distro which is currently

On Sun Jan 21 03:08:25 2024 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > # samba-tool dns delete mail 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa 2 PTR > > mail.hprs.local Password for [administrator at HPRS.LOCAL]: > > ERROR(runtime): The record does not exist > > > > I must still be doing something wrong. > > Yes, you didn't say that you you wanted

Can work if you use provisioning with BIND9_FLATFILE anyway i tested that long time ago.. but then you wil be missing the "Multimaster" dns ability. Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: donderdag 22 januari 2015 11:10 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:57 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 28/08/2019 19:49, Andy Strohman via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm curious about this remark on the wiki[1] : > > "do NOT use NONE as the DNS backend, it is not supported and will be > > removed in a future Samba version." > > > >

Hai, ? i was reading: ? http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO#Testing_DNS? which stats : Don't use BIND9_FLATFILE! It's not documented and supported!? ? This is wrong imo.? ? bind9_flatefile works fine, it just does not support multi master dns, and bind9_DLZ does. so you must setup a master/slave setup for bind9 with flatfile ? If you need to run a network with

Hi all, I got some issues with adding DNS records. I still use BIND9_FLATFILE on my first DC. Maybe this is the problem? What I would like to try is to change from BIND9_FLATFILE to BIND9_DLZ. I change the backend from BIND9_FLATFILE to BIND9_DLZ twice (in the past or other servers) but I don't remember how I did this anymore! What I did try is the following... and that didn't work. I

> > You are using Bind9 with flatfiles, this is NOT recommended. > If you are using the standard Ubuntu Bind9 package, you should be using > BIND9_DLZ and this stores the dns info in AD. > How did you provision the DC, was it with 'BIND9_FLATFILE' or > 'BIND9_DLZ' ? > If it was the later, just remove the 'wie' zone and its reverse zone > from the

Thanks for the info, At the moment, I don't have more than 1 DC, but I am planning on doing the bind master/slave thing thing soon using the Linux webserver host. With failover, I don't see why that wouldn't work with multiple DCs (but of course haven't tried yet). In any case, our AD/DC also hosts mail and redirected folders do if it goes down we've got big problem anyway --

I'm running into trouble while setting up samba4 on centos 6.4 see #yum install -y libacl-devel libblkid-devel gnutls-devel readline-devel python-devel gdb pkgconfig krb5-workstation zlib-devel setroubleshoot-server setroubleshoot-plugins policycoreutils-python libsemanage-python setools-libs-python setools-libs popt-devel libpcap-devel sqlite-devel libidn-devel libxml2-devel libacl-devel

On Jul 24 13:30:11 2023 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 24/07/2023 17:46, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > > I removed the new computer from the domain and deleted the smb.conf file. I then > > did: > > > > samba-tool domain join hprs.local DC --option='idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes' -U Administrator [deleted] > It sounds

Hi Guys, Setup: Versions: Samba: 4.6.7 Bind9: 9.10.3 Firewall disabled AD Provision: Migrated from samba 3 to 4 using classic upgrade. samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/var/lib/samba.PDC/dbdir --realm=TEST.LOCAL --dns-backend=BIND9_FLATFILE /etc/samba.PDC/smb.PDC.conf The following was the section in regards to the upgrade Processing section

*Hi! When I tried to install active directory in Debian Jessie I had following errors in the end. I followed the samba instructions to install it. Can you please help me? And plus I'm new in linux. :)* root at server-linux:~# nano /etc/hosts root at server-linux:~# export PATH=/usr/local/samba/bin/:/usr/local/samba/sbin/:$PATH root at server-linux:~# samba-tool domain provision .....

On Sat Jan 28 02:37:16 2023 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 28/01/2023 06:44, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > > I wrote earlier about setting the domain user password minimum to > 14 > > characters. It was advised that my first step should be to upgrade from Samba > > 4.8.2 to the most recent version available which for my Slackware 15.0