similar to: Samba ADDS DC krb5 and samba_nsupdate

Many (many) hours later, I'm finally throwing in the towel and seeking help. I have read everything I can find on the internet to no avail to get past my issues. I have to say, I'm very disappointed in the general quality and fragmentation of information on this topic. Samba isn't a turn-key solution as an AD by any stretch of the imagination. I've run the gamut so far with

On 11/19/2015 9:44 AM, Thierry Hotelier wrote: > hello, > we've just upgraded from samba 3.6.6 to samba 4.3.0. We are using > INTERNAL as dns backend. We have 1 domain and 6 DCs on 5 different > sites. Replication between DCs is ok as we can see with "samba-tool > drs showrepl". We configured them like it is described on the wiki and > used the RSAT tool

On 03/09/2019 10:07, Marcio Demetrio Bacci via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using Samba 4.10.7 with Bind9_DLZ (9.10.3-P4-Debian), but I'm not > getting to insert a new DC into the Domain. My SO is a VM Debian 9.9. > > Following is the command used and the error: > > root at samba4-dc3:/var/lib/samba/private# samba-tool domain join > empresa.com.br DC -k yes

2015-11-10 22:07 GMT+08:00 James <lingpanda101 at gmail.com>: > I't appears all versions of Samba 4.2.X allow secure updates. It's >> transitioning to any version of Samba 4.3.X that prevents secure >> updates. Looking at the Wireshark captures of a successful update >> >> https://www.cloudshark.org/captures/79e72c42de44 >> >>

I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose. Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable I already checked what?s listed @

Ah i see.. /usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab Thats the "old" path.. Your using bind9 you should have: /usr/local/samba/bind-dns/dns.keytab dont forget to set the needed rights on bind-dns folder. On road, cant look deeper in it. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Rommel Rodriguez Toirac [mailto:rommelrt at nauta.cu] > Verzonden:

On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: > >>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>> >>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>> is some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the >>> top levels: FQDN

Dear all, after succesfull joining my new samba 4 DC to the domain. There is an error on using, samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names On the new joined dc: dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable Failed nsupdate: 1 How can I fix it!? Dnsupdate on the Master is running well. [root at s4slave etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs: ['192.168.135.253'] Skipping PDC entry (SRV

> So you never read this: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC > Which means that you probably never ran the aptly named > 'samba_upgradedns'Of course I ran this. Many times. I'm not stupid, Rowland. At least I can read:D If I've seen that Bind doesn't work, I had to change backend to internal DNS.I carefully read and made

I'm having trouble with nsupdates.  I'm getting TKEY is unacceptable. I'm using Fedora 29, with its packages: [root at dc2 kwhite]# rpm -qa | grep samba samba-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-dc-bind-dlz-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-common-4.9.4-1.fc29.noarch samba-libs-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-dc-libs-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-winbind-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64 samba-common-libs-4.9.4-1.fc29.x86_64

Hi, samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names IPs: ['192.168.1.20'] force update: A samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br 192.168.1.20 force update: NS empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br force update: NS _msdcs.empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br force update: A empresa.com.br 192.168.1.20 force update: SRV _ldap._tcp.empresa.com.br samba4-dc1.empresa.com.br 389 force update: SRV

On 10/12/15 14:00, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 10.12.2015 um 14:38 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 10/12/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> Is it possible that kdc server is always the SOA, at least if >>> derived from DNS and not specified *explicitly* in the krb5.conf? >>> >>> In my DNS-Manager console I find that >>> >>>

Hi, I used to upgrade/migrated samba 3.3.10 to samba 3.4.17 with LDAP backend in place, while upgrading the CentOS from 5.5 to 5.9. In place to retain the trust relationship. The users can able to login without re-authentication from existing machines. Tested 3 XPs, and 3 Win7 but it takes 5-8 mins to login compared to 1 win7 that was re-connected (disconnected from domain, restart, then rejoin

hello, we've just upgraded from samba 3.6.6 to samba 4.3.0. We are using INTERNAL as dns backend. We have 1 domain and 6 DCs on 5 different sites. Replication between DCs is ok as we can see with "samba-tool drs showrepl". We configured them like it is described on the wiki and used the RSAT tool "Sites and services" to add sites, subnets, links ... But for the 4 DCs

Hi I know that this has been addressed before but I couldn't find a solution. Summary: when attempting to write a dns record using nsupdate, nothing gets written to the zone due to the error: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure Everything is working. We can login to the domain from the same client and we have sssd sending the dyndns update requests which also produce the same

I am trying to setup dynamic updates with bind_dlz backend, but for some reason if any windows client or linux with nsupdate tries to remove AAAA record, server just 'cancelling transaction', while A and PTR records (both on reverse ipv4 and ipv6) working fine. If i'am remove AAAA record manually via samba-tool or windows mmc then AAAA record can be updated, but after that it again

On 1/2/2018 1:51 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:38:52 -0500 > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> A few other observations while attempting to switch. >> >> * I do not have a dns.keytab file. Should I or is created after >> attempting to switch? > See my earlier post about samba_dnsupgrade. >

Hello Hello I'm using samba4 rc1 since 2 months as PDC with samba4 internal DNS. Everything works but i can't ping domain clinets via its names. Clients are named as stacja00X.localdomain where X is station number. But even on SambaPDC i can't ping it with for exapmle: ping stacja003.localdomain or ping stacja003 nslookup says that there is no host like that. Funny becouse domain

Hi, I've some trouble in getting samba internal DNS server in sync with others DNS (Windows) of my AD domain. samba_dnsupdate returns: update failed: REFUSED Failed update of 1 entries I'm running samba Version 4.5.12-Debian root at mysamba4dc:~# dpkg -l | grep samba ii  python-samba                   2:4.5.12+dfsg-2+deb9u3 amd64        Python bindings for Samba ii 

I've set up a lab for testing Samba 4.1 as an RODC emulating a satellite office setup, using the sernet packages on SLES11SP2. ## Problem 1 samba_dnsupdate is failing: ==> /var/log/samba/log.samba <== [2013/11/18 13:22:37.416193, 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:317(samba_runcmd_io_handler) /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure [2013/11/18