similar to: I cannot upgrade openssl-stablr

Am I correct in assuming that if I do a: make OPENSSL_OVERWRITE_BASE=yes install clean in /usr/ports/security/openssl ( after updating my ports tree ) that the port will overwrite the base openssl, thus not requiring the subsequent patch and recompile of the OS to patch this Vulnerability? Dana

Hi all and TIA for any help, I find myself in an imposed quandry. I am using cPanel on 4.11-RELEASE-p13 boxes. 99% of the system works well, but I've come across an issue with ssl. It's caused my certs to suddenly crap out and SSL connections from payment processors no longer work (making my customers a tad angry) The base system has openssl-0.9.7d and the ports are linked against

OK, It works if I modify my make.conf to not build openss[lh] like it : #MAKE_KERBEROS5= yes # TEST NO_OPENSSH= true # do not build OpenSSH NO_OPENSSL= true # do not build OpenSSL (implies NO_OPENSSH) Maybe I install openss[hl] as ports after... But I'm not satisfied with this way... -- G?rard MILHAUD ?cole Sup?rieure d'Ing?nieurs de Luminy (ESIL) Luminy - Case 925 -

At 14:24 9/19/2004, JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil, wrote: >Personally, unless one has great need not to, I highly recommend upgrading >to samba3 to start with. The perfomance gains alone I found well worth it. >Plus if you plan to integrate into a network with 2k/XP/2K3, it will greatly >improve compatibility. OK. I tried to install samba 3.0.7,1. Got the same error:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Potential SSL 2.0 rollback Category: contrib Module: openssl Announced: 2005-10-11

[ Sorry for the length of this; I felt it better to provide potentially too much info, rather than not enough. I've probably missed something that's important, though! ] I have an odd problem with 5.1p on RHEL3 if "UsePAM yes" and "UsePrivilegeSeparation no" is set. The code detects that the user password is aged (according to shadow) but then fails to let me

Hi all, I was intending on trying out gjournal on a new disk i've added in my desktop. I had a look to see what the most recent patch provided by Pawel and found http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/gjournal6_20061024.patch I created the directories as per Pawel's original post (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2006-June/001962.html) and the patch succeeded with no failed