similar to: which windows software can communicate with ipsec(racoon)?

Hi, while testing racoon on Linux (based on the ported ipsec-tools) the following issue appeared: Racoon did not verify the RSA Signatures during Phase 1 in either main or aggressive mode. Authentication was possible using a correct certificate and a wrong private key. I have verified the below problem using racoon-20030711 on FreeBSD 4.9. I will test it using the SNAP Kit but suspect it to be

Hi all, Somebody can explains me how can I configure ipsec-tools package to use private virtual ip address as an openswan does or some doc/howto about it?? I have seen this howto, but doesn't works for me: http://www.howtoforge.com/racoon_roadwarrior_vpn Many thanks. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

As was accidently posted here earlier by Ralf :-), you should be aware of this issue: http://vuxml.freebsd.org/d8769838-8814-11d8-90d1-0020ed76ef5a.html racoon fails to verify signature during Phase 1 Affected packages racoon < 20040407b Details VuXML ID d8769838-8814-11d8-90d1-0020ed76ef5a Discovery 2004-04-05 Entry 2004-04-07 Ralf Spenneberg discovered a serious

SuSE10.2 Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Patched, Whenever I try to establish a connection raccoon fails giving the following error. Raccoon config ################# remote 67.101.176.*** { exchange_mode main,aggressive; doi ipsec_doi; situation identity_only; my_identifier address; send_cr off; send_cert off; lifetime time 2 min;

There is an update to ipsec-tools for CentOS 3.1 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-165.html refers. Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/ipsec-tools-0.2.5-0.4.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/ipsec-tools-0.2.5-0.4.src.rpm which is also dependant on :- updates/i386/RPMS/initscripts-7.31.13.EL-1.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/initscripts-7.31.13.EL-1.centos.1.src.rpm These are

Hello, I have given myself quite the headache trying to make this VPN work correctly. I am attempting to use racoon to establish keys and construct an encrypted tunnel between one host(A.A.A.A) with a routable IP address and another that has a private address(10.0.0.2) with a cable modem(B.B.B.B) forwarding all ports to the private address(10.0.0.2). Here is a quick topographic dipiction of the

Hi Running racoon on a Freebsd-4.11 machine gives a kernel panic. I am using the racoon from ports directory which comes with the freebsd installation. Steps followed are as shown below: racoon -f /usr/local/etc/racoon/raccon.conf setkey -f ipsec.conf ping -c 1 <ip_of_the_other_gw> The ping will lead into a crash. The crash dump looks like for th ping packet it

I am attempting to create an ipsec tunnel between two CentOS 5.1 systems, network-to-network with two different 192.168.xxx.0/24 LAN segments. I have gone through the documentation on the centos web site, and have the machines to the point where the /var/log/messages show ``IPsec-SA established'' on both machines after runnig ``ifup ipsec0'' (same ipsec0 on each machine). IP

Hi everyone, I wrote up a post on the FreeBSD forums about the issue I am having. It's rather long so I am providing a link to it here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=39595 In summary, it seems that when the packets are routed in to the gateway from local network hosts, the src and dst addresses are changed to the public IPs of the tunnel -- at least from the perspective of the

[ -netters, please Cc me or security@ with replies. ] I'm running into trouble integrating dynamic racoon-based IPSec into a network with ipfw and natd. I need to be able to allow VPN access from any address from authenticated clients. I've got the dynamic VPN working, with racoon negotiating SAs and installing SPs, but the problem is that I can't tell whether an incoming packet on

I have no idea whatsoever as to why racoon/IKE does not work here. I've tried various how-to documents but found nothing that works for me. Gateway (10.0.0.1) running 4.9-stable. Laptop (10.0.0.10) running 5.2.1-release. Both running racoon-20040408a On the gateway 10.0.0.1 # cat /etc/ipsec.conf add 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.10 esp 691 -E rijndael-cbc "1234567890123456" -A hmac-sha1

FYI, looks like support for Racoon is ending. Does anyone have any experience with the version in ipsec-tools ? ---Mike >Racoon users, > >This is the announcement that the kame project will quit providing >a key management daemon, the racoon, and that "ipsec-tools" will become >the formal team to release the racoon. >The final release of the racoon in the

I am trying to get a tunnel from a cisco 1760 with IOS 12.2.15.t13 to a freebsd 4.9 install with racoon. I have package version freebsd-20040408a and internal version 20001216 in my log file. I posted the full racoon and cisco log below my configs. Racoon keeps saying: 2004-07-26 16:24:03: DEBUG: isakmp.c:2295:isakmp_printpacket(): begin. 2004-07-26 16:24:03: DEBUG:

Hi, I am developing on an embedded MIPS-based system; I have iproute2''s ip working correctly talking to the kernel, but tc seems to be broken. I''d like to fix this, but I need a little bit of help in figuring out how tc communictes with the kernel -- can someone tell me the places I should be looking? Thanks. Joseph

Hi, I am currently running a Debian lenny on top of a Ubuntu 9.04 dom0. (Xen version is 3.4) Now I want to test some tpm functions in the domU, but I am having troubles reaching the TPM. To do so, I am following the tutorial here : https://www.grounation.org/index.php?post/2008/07/04/8-how-to-use-a-tpm-with-linux I have already used this tutorial on a non-virtualised machine, and even on my

I want to know how xend handle those messages, got lost in those files. Which file I should look for those codes? Thanks, -x ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.

We need to create many virtual machines and assign an static ip for each of them. To do this, 1. we can use one dhcp server to assign ip for them, and bind the MAC to it's ip. But we got many many machines, so this is not easy to operate for admins. 2. we can just create the vm and then let the client to config the ip from within the operating system. But the client don't want to, and

You might try the free SSH client, putty (from: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/). It has a command line SCP client (pscp) that will allow you to securely copy the file from Unix box, under windows. I've used it and had excellent results. Good luck, Paul "Manish K" <manish.k at db.com> wrote: Hi I got the email-id from the web site. Kindly let me know

Does anyone know of a way to get my Windows MFC app running under WINE to call a function in a native OS X lib or plugin? I would like the ability for my Windows app to call some custom functions which would pull information about the current machine, such as OS X version for example. I dont really care as to how but I was thinking I could write a 'generic c++ plugin' or 'c++

HI folks, I have set a barging facility with our production box.Client able to barge a agent but client raise a requirement, they want talk to barge agent but that communication is not listen by customer. It is possible with asterisk or not. thanks in advance. Regards Akhilesh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: