similar to: Enc: FreeBSD and the new virtual machine-based rootkits

Hi all, I need to solve double integrals with no closed solution. Calling x and y the two variables we have x ~ Normal(y*v,1) and y ~Half-Normal(0,1). In fact, given a joint funcion g(x,y), I need evaluate the integral of this function under that random structure. Could anyone suggest me a package or even a suitable method to solve this problem? Thanks all, Caio

In ubuntu 6,06 the R normally run, but latter to install the a vesion 6,10 plot this not appearing. computer with problem: /usr/share/X11/fonts$ ls misc Type1 X11R7 In computer OK: /usr/share/X11/fonts$ls 100dpi(*) 75dpi encodings fonts.cache-1 misc Type1 ----- Mensagem original ---- De: Peter Dalgaard <p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk> Para: Ricardo Arias Brito

All, I have written a trusted execution module and would appreciate if anyone could help in testing. This module provides a functionality similar to NetBSD's verified exec mechanism. Once the design details of this security policy has been solidified, I will be releasing a white paper which describes the technical implementation in greater detail. The mac_chkexec policy logic can be found

On Nov 4, 2006, at 8:30 AM, Wesley Shields <wxs@atarininja.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 07:54:59AM -0800, Ricardo A. Reis wrote: > [...] >> In the II COLARIS - Joanna Rutkowska alert the possible >> new technology of Malware's using hardware virtualization, present >> in AMD and INTEL new processor. >> >> I've two questions ...

On a rather full customer web server, I am trying to track down whose web site script is trying to make outbound network connections when they should not be. In /etc/security/audit_control, I added to the flags line dir:/var/audit flags:lo,aa,-nt minfree:5 to log failed network connection. When I try an make an outbound connection to something that is blocked in pf, it seems to sometimes work.

Um texto embutido e sem conjunto de caracteres especificado associado... Nome: n?o dispon?vel Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20061028/f13e24ff/attachment.pl

Hello, when one has physical access to a computer, he can run something like tripwire, with keys and checksum on a separate, write-only media, to verify the integrity of the system. What if the system is a remote one (in my case Centos 4.3 on a User Mode Linux VPS some hundred of KMs from here)? Does it still make sense to run tripwire remotely? If yes, how, since you cannot plug a floppy or

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1420 Summary: BSM support on Mac OS X Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

I think I've found a bug with sshd handling audit events for commands (like scp) over ssh1 connections. Specifically, after updating to a recent FreeBSD 6.x with audit support, I'm getting log messages like these when using scp over ssh1: Sep 12 14:13:16 <auth.info> bm55 sshd[12335]: Accepted rsa for xxx from A.B.C.D port 2981 Sep 12 14:13:16 <auth.crit> bm55 sshd[12335]:

Dear All, I'd like to fit a "kind" of logistic model to small data-set using nonlinear least-squares regression. A transcript of R-script are reproduced below. Estimated B and T (the model's coeff, herein B=-8,50 and T=5,46) seem appropriate (at least visually) but are quite diff from those obtained w/ SPSS (Levenberg-Marquardt): B=-19,56 and T=2,37. Am I doing something wrong in

Voc? tem uma nova mensagem no Badoo! Gilberto Nunes deixou uma mensagem pra voc?. Clique no link para abrir: http://us1.badoo.com/01097897898/in/BDGmMoCC9H8/?lang_id=61 E, outras pessoas estiveram procurando por voc?: Manoel Felipe (Joinville, Brasil)Mara Leal mendes (Joinville, Brasil)Tiago Gabriel (Joinville, Brasil) Se os links desta mensagem n?o funcionarem, copie e cole os links na barra

Hi there, Forgive me for repeating a question asked about a year ago: > Hi, > > Just wondered if anyone had got the following to work or if there are any > plans to add this functionality. > > * X.509 certificate support for authentication. As used in the likes of > stunnel, mod_ssl etc for client auth. > > * Directory based (LDAP) key lookup. Either

--- In english --- Hello! I am to implement a new architecture of the network in my company but I do not know right where to start ... need help! Currently 90% of my servers are virtual machines under Xen. I have many valid IP networks and all Hypervisors are configured in bridge mode, to simplify. We have 3 VMWare ESX Hypervisor also in bridge mode. Some networks are exclusive to certain

I ran chkrootkit and this is what I got. should I worry or is this normal? I'm running 4.8 thanks. Checking `wted'... 3 deletion(s) between Sat Jun 26 18:10:21 2027 and Sun Mar 24 04:27:12 2024 4 deletion(s) between Sun Mar 24 04:27:12 2024 and Sun Mar 24 04:27:12 2024 5 deletion(s) between Sun Mar 24 04:27:12 2024 and Sun Mar 24 04:27:12 2024 1 deletion(s) between Sun Mar 24 04:27:12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ok...did some checking. I forgot to mention that I killed dead syslogd. Not just a -HUP but an actual kill and restarted. I did this several times. I was trying to get something else to work. Anyway, I killed it again this morning and restarted. The infect message went away immediately. Could this have been the problem? -

If the attacker could get a shell, the attacker could have used this local root exploit to get the necessary privileges to install the rootkit. One reason why there seem to be few RHEL reports is that RHEL5 is not that widely available yet but lots of vulnerable Fedora/Debian installations are available.

On 16.06.2018 13:49, Ahmed Soliman wrote: > Following up on these threads: > - https://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=151929803301378&w=2 > - http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2018/02/22/18 > > I lost the original emails so I couldn't reply to them, and also sorry > for being late, it was the end of semester exams. > > I was adviced on #qemu and

On 19 June 2018 at 19:37, David Vrabel <david.vrabel at nutanix.com> wrote: > It's not clear how this increases security. What threats is this > protecting again? It won't completely protect prevent rootkits, because still rootkits can edit dynamic kernel data structures, but it will limit what rootkits damage to only dynamic data. This way system calls can't be changed, or

Hi, there is a remote (VPS) Centos 4.2 server which *may* have been compromised. Reinstalling everything from scratch isn't a problem, it may even be an occasion to improve a few things, the question is another. There are backups of necessary shell script, ASCII configuration files and more or less important email (maildir format, if it matters) including messages with binary attachments in

Hello everyone, I hope you are having a good day. However, I am concerned by this: https://isc.sans.edu/diary/SSHD+rootkit+in+the+wild/15229 Has anyone heard yet what the attack vector is, if 5.9 and 6.4 are affected, and if a patch is coming out? Thanks! Gilbert ******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste