similar to: Non-standard fields?

Hi, On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. >> >> I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively

On 09/11/2017 10:42 AM, Sami Ketola wrote: >> On 11 Sep 2017, at 11.24, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> I use dovecot with a broken IMAP server (which doesn't properly implement command pipelining amongst others) as an imapc backend. >> Dovecot issues the above command sequence (SELECT and UID FETCH pipelined), which doesn't work with this server. >>

On 08 Feb 2016, at 12:56, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: > > On 02/08/16 11:16, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> Oh, you were thinking about ability to provide IMAP/etc support for other random servers, and have Dovecot act as kind of a middleware and translate the requests. Maybe the answer is still jmap though? It would require jmap lib-storage backend similar to imapc, which

Hi, This is a capture from an imapc client session (which is triggered by a message, received via LMTP): * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 NAMESPACE] Ready 2 LOGIN "uid" "pass" 2 OK LOGIN succeeded 1 LIST "" "" * LIST (\Noselect) "/" "" 1 OK LIST completed 3 APPEND "INBOX" {568} + Ready for 568 octets of data [...] 3 OK APPEND

Hi, imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively handle boundless fetches (like a list with all wanted UIDs, or simply 1:* if all are needed), do you see this as a good addition to develop? This could be a

Hi, Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established, compatible protocol frontend with an open backend API, which could be used to easily make a custom storage backend for the LMTP/POP/IMAP frontend in any language, in any programming paradigm,

On 09/11/2017 09:17 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 08.09.2017 15:29, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> On 09/08/2017 01:53 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> On 08.09.2017 14:50, Nagy, Attila wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've a broken IMAP server, which doesn't support pipelining and fails >>>> on dovecot's attempt to do this ([C] is

> On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:59, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:01, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. >> I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established,

On 09/11/2017 11:14 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 11.09.2017 11:59, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> On 09/11/2017 10:42 AM, Sami Ketola wrote: >>>> On 11 Sep 2017, at 11.24, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >>>> I use dovecot with a broken IMAP server (which doesn't properly >>>> implement command pipelining amongst others) as an imapc backend.

I'd like to add S=<size> and W=<vsize> to the filenames in my Maildir storage for newly delivered mails. But I cannot find where I can make Dovecot's LDA add those. Anybody? http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir says: A maildir filename with those fields would look something like: 1035478339.27041_118.foo.org,S=1000,W=1030:2,S which is exactly what I want, but it

Hi, I have the following config in dovecot 2.2.18: # doveconf -n userdb passdb userdb { driver = prefetch } passdb { args = host=127.0.0.1 port=1430 default_fields = userdb_imapc_user=%u userdb_imapc_password=%w driver = imap } I guess it should cause a single login to the backend IMAP server when issuing a LOGIN to dovecot. Yet, dovecot opens two TCP sessions. In the first, it

Hello, I have some jails running on ZFS, so I have to mount devfs's into them. For this purpose, I have some similar lines in /etc/fstab: devfs /pool/jail/ldap/dev devfs rw 0 0 Where /pool is a ZFS filesystem. This has worked until today -when I upgraded from a previous 7-STABLE (FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #16: Fri Mar 7 14:30:08 CET 2008) to today's STABLE- but not

Hi, I'm trying to migrate from the deprecated autocreate plugin to the mailbox { auto }setting without success. What do I forget, or misunderstand? I deliver mails via LMTP and log in on IMAP, neither of them create the folders other than the inbox itself. # doveconf -n # 2.2.2: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE amd64 auth_cache_negative_ttl = 0 auth_cache_size

Hi. Is there a 802.1x implementation (client and server) for FreeBSD -STABLE? Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam

Hello, I'm wondering about closing some information leaks in FreeBSD jails from the "outside world". Not that critical (depends on the application), but a simple user, with restricted devfs in the jail (devfsrules_jail for example from /etc/defaults/devfs.rules) can figure out the following: - network interfaces related data, via ifconfig, which contains everything, but the

Hi, IP traffic from one jail to another jail, arrives on destination jail on lo0 having the destination jails IP as source IP. Why not the source jail's IP address? How can I filter traffic from one jail to another, using ipfw of ipf? Cheers, -- Anders.

Hello, I have a setup where there are multiple maildir users, one of them being the pop/imap server itself, the others are for example a maildir capable webmail and message replication. I would like to evaluate Dovecot, but I wonder how would its binary indexes and logs fit into this picture. After running through http://wiki.dovecot.org/IndexFiles I'm not sure how well would Dovecot

I?m considering moving from maildir to mdbox, but don?t quite see how I should do the conversion with minimal downtime. Our userdb is ldap, and the we use this setting to point to the users maildirectory: user_attrs = mailMessageStore=mail=maildir:%$:INDEX=/indexes/%1u/%1.1u/%u,mailQuota=quota_rule=*:storage=%$ i.e. every user has a "mailMessageStore" attribute in LDAP that points to

Hi, I originally picked mdbox because I had the impression from reading about it on the mailing list that it was more performant and that it would conserve disc space. But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double the storage as reported. I mean, IMAP QUOTA reports around 900MB for one account that has over 2GB when I inspect the mail location of the user using the linux command `du`

v2.1 supports now multiple LDAP fields in a template e.g.: user_attrs = \ homeDirectory=home, \ uidNumber=uid, \ gidNumber=gid, \ =mail=%{ldap:mailboxFormat}:%{ldap:homeDirectory} which is the same as: user_attrs = \ =home=%{ldap:homeDirectory}, \ =uid=%{ldap:uidNumber}, \ =gid=%{ldap:gidNumber}, \ =mail=%{ldap:mailboxFormat}:%{ldap:homeDirectory} I was also thinking about