similar to: security weakness

forgot this addr. -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the hackerscene -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Remko Lodder [mailto:remko@elvandar.org] Verzonden: vrijdag 23 januari 2004 10:53 Aan: Nick Twaddell Onderwerp: RE: [Freebsd-security] ipfw + named problem did you tcpdump the packets so that you can

Yeah but if you are uncertain about your own box my VERY STRONG advise is that you reinstall. IF your host is indeed owned, then you are a lot further away then just reinstalling, god knows what issues can arrise when a cracker exploits the system to do bogus tasks.. Then i say: Too bad for your time, sorry but it's like that -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org

Hi, I dont think you can deny all ddos against your box, you will need help from your isp. That is because if a person sends you enough packets, like 1mbit (and your line is 1mbit) full of packets, your connection is stuck, whether you filter or not. Though you can mitigate those by closing all non needed ports, log them if any attempt is being made to connect to them, and use a bogon list which

that only works when you are presuming that the host was not hacked already because i would clear those logs when i hacked a system :) but indeed it's a try, If you remain unsure, it is best to reinstall the system to be sure that a fresh and newly updated (yeah update it when installed :)) system is not compromised at that time.. loads of work, but it gives you some relief to know that

yes unless you use the version as of :> 2004-03-02 17:24:46 UTC (RELENG_5_2, 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1) check it out with uname -a if it does not say -p1 it affects you. My guess, you are affected :) cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the hackerscene -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van:

http://www.isc.org/sw/bind/view/?release=9.3.4 SECURITY ADVISORIES * CVE-2006-4095 CERT Vulnerability Note VU#915404 NISCC 172003 * CVE-2006-4096 CERT Vulnerability Note VU#697164 NISCC 172003 * CAN-2005-0034 NISCC-UNIRAS 20050125-00059 CERT Vulnerability Note VU#938617 [ODiP] == Dmitry Grigorovich

> On 16 Sep 2015, at 19:10, Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org> wrote: > > Does the Dovecot NTLM mechanism work with MS Outlook? > > [ ] YES > [ ] NO > > Please check one ... anybody. > > ?Mark The URL on the wiki, which had probably been shared before with you; http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ActiveDirectoryNtlm suggests it does. The URL quotes: Step 5.

Quoting Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: >> On 11 Jul 2016, at 17:36, Rick Romero <rick at havokmon.com> wrote: >> >> Quoting "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml at o-sinc.com>: >> >>> You are not alone! >>> >>> On Wednesday, July 06, 2016 01:15:34 PM Remko Lodder wrote: >>>> Dear list, >>>>

Hi People, I recently setup a replication service within dovecot between two machines in different datacenters, which has the following configuration; (yes it is hashed out, because I needed to) #service replicator { # unix_listener replicator-doveadm { # mode = 0666 # } # process_min_avail = 1 #} # #service aggregator { # fifo_listener replication-notify-fifo { # mode = 0666 #

Maybe you could not delete the message instantly, but keep track of last seen UID. UIDs increase monotonically, so you can rest assured that next arriving email has larger UID. Then you can bulk delete mails that are older than one day. Aki > On October 20, 2017 at 8:01 PM Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Anyone has suggestions? The situation

Zitat von Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: Hi Remko, > Emails can only be read if they are authenticated / authorized in > someway to access the store. That means you might need to share the > info@ credentials with the other > people so that they can read it over imap or webmail etc. That is self-evident and it is not a problem. I can't understand what you

> On 7 Jun 2018, at 07:21, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot at reub.net> wrote: > > Still not quite right for me. > > Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync(lightning.reub.net): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds (last sent=mail, last recv=mail (EOL)) > Jun 7 15:11:33 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: Timeout during

On 29.06.2018 10:53, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > Zitat von Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: > > Hi Remko, > >> Emails can only be read if they are authenticated / authorized in >> someway to access the store. That means you might need to share the >> info@ credentials with the other >> people so that they can read it over imap or webmail etc. > >

On 29/06/18 09:53, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > Zitat von Remko Lodder <remko at freebsd.org>: > > Hi Remko, > >> Emails can only be read if they are authenticated / authorized in >> someway to access the store. That means you might need to share the >> info@ credentials with the other >> people so that they can read it over imap or webmail etc. > >

You will face additional problems with this approach, the first user who reads a message will mark it as read for consecutive users. It's better to make a public mailbox for that but that involves more complex setup And dovecot is not so admin friendly on this matter from my experience so far. George On Fri, Jun 29, 2018, 10:59 Luca Bertoncello <lucabert at lucabert.de> wrote: >

We have the same problem, with a twist. When Thunderbird deletes a folder, it is still shown by the GUI. Dovecot deleted the folder correctly, and the sunscriptions file is also correct. Some other times, on shared folders, Thunderbird refuses to delete; in this case, apple mail on iphone can delete successfully. This suggests that the problem is in Thunderbird's code. R On Mon, Feb 5, 2018

On 31. May 2018, at 18:09, Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> On 31 May 2018, at 17:52, Michael Grimm <trashcan at ellael.org> wrote: >> I would love to get some feedback from the developers regarding: >> >> #) are commercial customers of yours running 2.3 master-master replication without those issues reported in this thread? >> #) do you get

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, Randy Bush wrote: > Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 22:08:22 +0900 > From: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> > To: Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org> > Cc: Christian Kivalo <ml+dovecot at valo.at>, dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: Re: pam auth problem > >>> auth: in openpam_parse_chain():

On 1/06/2018 2:47 AM, Michael Grimm wrote: > On 31. May 2018, at 18:09, Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>> On 31 May 2018, at 17:52, Michael Grimm <trashcan at ellael.org> wrote: >>> I would love to get some feedback from the developers regarding: >>> >>> #) are commercial customers of yours running 2.3 master-master replication

Aaaaand I forgot to CC the list, sorry for that, it's way too early in the morning :P On 07.06.18 - 07:39, Thore B?decker wrote: > What does the output of these two commands show after that error has > been logged? > > doveadm replicator status > > doveadm replicator dsync-status > > If there are *waiting failed* requests, that never make it "through" >