similar to: Asterisk Dimensioning on newer processors

These show up under Windows XP as if they are SCSI adapters (they're not, obviously.) Has there been any view towards supporting these on FreeBSD? They're on all the recent Intel motherboards for the last year and a half or so. Also, is there any particular benefit (or penalty) to running the amd64 build on Quad-Core or i7-series processors? I have an app that might benefit from

2 years ago at one Meetup in Paris, Marc Girondot, professor at University Paris-Saclay, presented his cluster built with 12 Odroid (equivalent to Rapsberry Pi). The stack was almost the same size than your picture as there was no fan and a narrower distance between each PCB card. There were many more cables. For a total cost of less than 1000 ? and an electrical consumption reduced by a

Hi, is there any good calculator/table/reference about proper dimensioning? I read the wiki and they basically say "xx users run fine in yy hardware" http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+dimensioning. SO far I read that: -Run up to 4 E1s per CPU (which one? an i386 or a dual core? -it is very CPU intensive to do transcoding. Try to minimize it. -you can help the CPU

Juan, I am running a Calling Card application on a Dell PowerEdge 2850 with Asterisk 1.0.7. Recording conversations I have seen on my server causes the processors to burn more than necessary so I would recommend what William from Signate recommended: " Consider saving recorded calls in a database on a separate server. It will be simpler to build a retrieval interface that does not

I have been trying to get a feel for scaling or dimensioning using asterisk 11. if I desire to use something like a dell r320, hardware RAID, 2G E5-2420, 4G RAM and only SIP trunking using gsm (least bandwidth and no transcoding) how many calls "out" can I expect to make at one time and asterisk still be OK and responsive? Thanks, Jerry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi Group, Is there any information available for Asterisk 1.8 dimensioning? I googled but couldn't find helpful data for 1.8. I am trying to figure out hardware configuration for following features implemented in Asterisk 1.8? (1)100 SIP clients. (2)ACD (Around 15 realtime queues) (3)Call recording for all SIP clients. (4)4 port PRI (E1). There would be around 100 concurrent calls.

Hi, Some help with dimensioning the server will be gladly accepted. -50 sip phones (g729) or g711(to avoid transcoding) in LAN -an asterisk server (1.4) doing normal pbx functions + voicemail in the same LAN -Some sporadic conferencing with no more than 2 sip phones and maybe 2 or 3 calls coming from the E1 for a total of 5 people in a conference. The asterisk server will get an E1(pri) via one

Hi, I've sucessfully completed an Openser 1.3.2 + Mediaproxy 1.9.1 + Asterisk 1.4 + CDRTool with freeradius telephony system. Asterisk is used only for voice mail and redirectioning calls. Every calls should pass through mediaproxy so that i can account them. The goal was to create a simple prototype of what could be a VoIP provider. Now i need to dimensioning this system to work

On 10/27/2013 05:57 PM ken wrote: > One laptop I'm looking at buying offers these CPU options: > > * 4 Generation Intel? Core? i7-4700MQ Processor ( 2.4 GHz 6MB L3 Cache - > 4 Cores plus Hyperthreading ) > > * 4th Generation Intel? Core? i7-4800MQ Processor ( 2.7 GHz 6MB L3 Cache > - 4 Cores plus Hyperthreading ) > > * 4th Generation Intel? Core? i7-4900MQ Processor

Is there a way to limit simultaneous calls. I like to limit simultaneous outgoing calls as more than few simulataneous calls are charged by my voip providers. However, I do not want to have any such restriction for internal calls. Thanks Jim

Hi, I have an application that requires decoding of Speex encoded speech in an embedded MIPS processor. Has anyone got any experience of compiling the Speex libraries for the MIPS 4KC processor using ELDK? Thanks Julian Julian Page Speech Technology Specialist HTK Limited julian.page at htk.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 31.5.2013 13:04, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 04:08:57PM +0200, Martijn van Beurden wrote: >> I was surprised to see that the Windows compile on wine actually >> outperformed the native Linux one. Probably GCC 4.6 optimized a little >> better or something very weird is going on in wine, I don't know. The >> assembly optimizations work very

Good morning, The tuning page says worker_processes should be at least the number of CPU cores on a dedicated server. In the case of hyper-threading, should this be the number of cores or the number of threads? For example the Intel Core i7-2600 Quadcore[1] has 4 cores and 8 threads. Would I start my worker_processes at 4 or 8? Finally, would the same apply to Nginx worker processes? Many

Hi, We are having a strange issue. If we run asterisk from /etc/inittab and then connect using asterisk -r, we don't see any logs coming in CLI. However logs are properly reported to /var/log/asterisk/messages and system is working fine. Now, if we run from command line (asterisk -f) and then usie asterisk -r, we properly see logs in CLI. This is bit strange and not able to solve this

Hi, Asterisk does not post CDR when dial status is CHANUNAVAIL. Can someone tell me what are the conditions under which CDR is not posted? Thanks Jim

Hi, I am experiencing a problem related to serialization behavior in 2.15.0 beta (binary installed from Debian unstable) and 2.16.0 (from svn) that is not present in 2.14.2 (binary from Debian testing). I don't fully understand the problem. Also, I tried but have not yet been able to create a small, self-contained example that reproduces the problem. However, I do have a large, not

Hi, First, depending on how much your particular core gets done in one cycle, it is possible that Speex can encode in real-time on a 60 MHz (can't guaranty, of course). The main thing to watch here is the speed of the multiplier. As for parallel encoding, the first thing is that you can't just encode every other frame on each CPU. That's because of the encoder memory. Also, most of

On 1.6.2013 14:24, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: > On 31.5.2013 13:04, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: >> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 04:08:57PM +0200, Martijn van Beurden wrote: >>> I was surprised to see that the Windows compile on wine actually >>> outperformed the native Linux one. Probably GCC 4.6 optimized a little >>> better or something very weird is going on in wine, I

Dear all, I've recently purchased a new 64bit system with an intel i7 quadcore processor. As I understood (maybe wrongly) that to date the 32bit version of R is more stable than the 64bit, I installed the 32bit version and am happily using it ever since. Now I'm running a whole lot of models, which goes smoothly, and I thought out of curiosity to check how much processor I'm using. I

Hi all. What is the best hardware configuration to handle this following scenario? - 4 IVR menu with conference applications for each option; - Only SIP/g711 user access - 3500 simultaneous users(800 at the beginning) - No ZAP channels Where is the most important point of failure? CPU? Ethernet? RAM? Im planning to separate in three servers: Server01: 01 Xeon 3Ghz getting the 1st level of