Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "vorbis-tools patches (was: Cover art)"
2011 Jan 22
0
Flac] Where Cover Art?
You said "With the exception of where to put a picture file, VorbisComments
in a Vorbis stream are the same as VorbisComments in a FLAC stream."
In METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE case they would not be the same. Up to now we
could exchange the complete block of VorbisComments. But with the addiction
of METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE doesn't happen this way.
In Ogg files the METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE
2011 Jan 23
0
Flac] Where Cover Art?
OK Martin. Thank you for the explanations and for your time.
I am writing a program that reads and writes all existent Tags types. It
lacks only to end the edition (rewriting) of "Native" Flac and Matroska.
Both cases for the same problem: the separation of Tags and Picture in
different blocks. In Flac I resolved it, but now I have to add
METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE. Reading Vorbis
2011 Jan 20
1
Flac] Where Cover Art?
"Santiago Jimeno" wrote:
> Flac files, as us knows, follows the Vorbis Tags system included in block 4
> Recently Vorbis has established the possibility to include picture files by
> means of 2 Tags: COVERARTMIME AND COVERART.
> To work therewith is quite easy.
No. this in incorrect. The VorbisComment
"COVERART" was only ever unofficial, and
has been deprecated
2012 Apr 17
1
command line perl tool to create ogg/Vorbis picture comments
On 14 April 2012 23:40, Ian Malone <ibmalone at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 April 2012 23:34, Ian Malone <ibmalone at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://pastebin.com/xXhPyZuQ
>
>> ./jpegtoblock.pl ?-i DSCN7376.JPG -o flacblock
>
>> You'll need to add the "METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE=" which makes it into a
>> comment file yourself.
>>
>
2014 Feb 12
0
[user] coverart and other tags
On 12 February 2014 13:02, Alice Wonder <alicewonder at shastaherps.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to using opus but so far I really am loving it. At 16kbps
> spoken content sounds fabulous.
>
> I am using opusenc on 64-bit linux - mostly with flac input.
>
> The one thing I can't figure out how to do is add album art. I tried
> passing the vorbis way of
2009 Mar 26
8
Cover art
Hello to the people reading this list!
I am developing tagging support for ogg vorbis in Nero products and we are
currently thinking of supporting cover art in ogg files. What is the current
state of proposal for cover art in ogg files? Is this
http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/VorbisComment#Cover_art still the latest
information?
Regards,
Goran
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML
2002 Aug 14
0
automake 1.6 compatability patch
This patch cleans up the vorbis-tools Makefile.am files so they work with both
automake 1.4 and 1.6. Some changes to configure.in were also needed in order
to get things to work (and to fix some ac 2.50 issues).
Please remove config.h from cvs as it is a generated file and empty anyway.
automake 1.6 isn't really incompatable with 1.4, it's just more picky about
you sticking to the rules:
2014 Feb 12
2
[user] coverart and other tags
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 14:29 +0000, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 12 February 2014 13:02, Alice Wonder <alicewonder at shastaherps.org> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am new to using opus but so far I really am loving it. At 16kbps
> > spoken content sounds fabulous.
> >
> > I am using opusenc on 64-bit linux - mostly with flac input.
> >
> > The one
2006 Jul 13
0
[vorbis-tools] Some patches coming from Debian bugs
Hello.
Attached are some patches that some Debian users of vorbis-tools have
sent to our BTS over the years (numbers refer to Debian bugs).
It'd be nice to see them integrated. They apply cleanly to SVN as of
today.
The largefile_support one is a bit bigger than just the configure.ac
since the submitter adviced that config.h got included in all C source
files before the standard includes,
2006 Jul 13
0
[vorbis-tools] Some patches coming from Debian bugs
Hello.
Attached are some patches that some Debian users of vorbis-tools have
sent to our BTS over the years (numbers refer to Debian bugs).
It'd be nice to see them integrated. They apply cleanly to SVN as of
today.
The largefile_support one is a bit bigger than just the configure.ac
since the submitter adviced that config.h got included in all C source
files before the standard includes,
2017 Jul 27
1
Fixing Ogg Vorbis files with incorrectly framed headers
Greetings.
Possibly as the result of buggy tagging software, several hundred of my
Ogg Vorbis files exhibit the following warning when examined by ogginfo:
WARNING: Vorbis stream 1 does not have headers correctly framed.
Terminal header page contains additional packets or has non-zero
granulepos
Nonetheless, most media players can play these files without any
problem. A notable exception is
2003 Jul 06
1
vorbiscomment causes "Illegal UTF-8 sequence in comment"
Could someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong here? I have some oggs tagged using other applications and ogginfo doesn't give me any warnings when I use UTF-8 in them.
I did the following:
$ vorbiscomment --raw -a test.ogg -t "test=åäö"
$ vorbiscomment --raw -l test.ogg
test=åäö
$ ogginfo -v test.ogg
Processing file "test.ogg"...
New logical stream (#1, serial:
2001 Sep 03
2
Building vorbis-tools without libao
Hi All,
For my new file (and thus mp3) server I've decided to switch
completely to Ogg Vorbis. This means having to reencode
~30GB worth of 128Kb MP3's, but i figured that it would all
be worth the effort. So I downloaded the sources for
libogg, libvorbis and vorbis-tools and fired up my trusty
old compiler. libogg and libvorbis built and installed
like a charm. Not so for
2001 Sep 03
0
[paul@mail.me.maar.nu: Building vorbis-tools without libao]
Again, Hi All,
Thanks for your replies. I probably should've mentioned that
I'm not subscribed to the list but I found your answers on
the archives.
I just wanted to go on record and mention that I do in fact
have all the original CD's and that by re-encoding I meant
repeating the entire process of ripping the original CD's
(with cdparanoia (of course ;)) and then encoding them
2009 Jul 23
1
Fixing ogg vorbis corruption caused by bad metadata
> However, there is a general point. ?Xiph policy
> now encourages cover art in VorbisComments
> using the METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE tag,
> visit:
> http://wiki.xiph.org/VorbisComment#Cover_art
>
> This means that VorbisComments can be
> huge, and so memory for them now needs to
> be allocated from the heap, not the stack.
Huge is relative. Are people really sticking
2014 Feb 12
3
[user] coverart and other tags
Hello,
I am new to using opus but so far I really am loving it. At 16kbps
spoken content sounds fabulous.
I am using opusenc on 64-bit linux - mostly with flac input.
The one thing I can't figure out how to do is add album art. I tried
passing the vorbis way of adding a metadata_block_picture comment field
to opusenc but it complained about the length.
I can't seem to find any
2008 Oct 18
1
Album art - requirements
>> So, a possible way to encode album art would be:
>>
>> - a Skeleton stream with appropriate header messages
>> - one Kate stream per image, carrying a PNG image
>> (alternatively, use Ogg/MNG, if someone brings it from the dead)
>> [...]
Silvia wrote:
>Interesting proposal. Not sure it won't over-complicate album art though...
Well yes, of course
2014 Oct 15
0
manpages of vorbis-tools
ping
On Jun 23 09:05:38, hans at stare.cz wrote:
> Dear authors of vorbis-tools,
>
> the manpages are currently writen using the man(7) markup language.
> Would there be any interest in having them rewritten to mdoc(7)?
>
> The mdoc(7) language allows for _semantic_ markup, expressing
> things like "this is an optional argument", as opposed to the physical
>
2017 Nov 15
1
manpages in mdoc(7)
Dear authors of Vorbis,
currently, the manpages that come with vorbistools
are written in the traditional man(7) markup language.
I am proposing to rewrite them into the semantic markup
of the mdoc(7) language. I am willing to do the work.
Both the man(7) and mdoc(7) languages have been around for decades,
and are supported by the prevalent formatters: groff(1) on most Linuxes
and mandoc(1) on
2008 Oct 15
0
Album art - requirements
> is coverart a header-type content or a time-aligned type content?
> > Well, it's collection-level metadata, so it doesn't belong in files
at all. :)
Well right, but the problem is that external coverart files are unhandy (broken links!!, streaming...)
Users therefore want to embed them most times, as you can tell from other audio file formats: the majority of cover art is