similar to: Ambisonics Proposal summary.

On 2/28/07, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/28/07, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote: > > Well, there are todo pages at wiki.xiph.org, but I meant more in the > > community folklore sense. My point is a roadmap doesn't help much unless > > there are people committed to making things happen. That's been the > > problem with a

On 2/28/07, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/28/07, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote: > > Well, there are todo pages at wiki.xiph.org, but I meant more in the > > community folklore sense. My point is a roadmap doesn't help much unless > > there are people committed to making things happen. That's been the > > problem with a

Hi Flac Developers, My name is Etienne Deleflie, I'm the founder of http://www.ambisonia.com and, more recently, http://soundofspace.com. Myself and the community I serve are looking for a lossless file format that can encapsulate ambisonic encoding. To this end a specification has been drafted, and is nearing stability, that describes practical features designed to get the most out of

"Gabriel I." wrote: > Greetings, > > I apologize if I posted this in the wrong list, I wasn't sure where to post > it, but seeing as the tags are called "vorbis comments" I thought vorbis, > rather than ogg-dev, would be the right choice. (actually, I'm not even a > developer anyway) Hi Gabriel, I doubt whether the Xiph community would promote a

2008/9/25 e deleflie <edeleflie at gmail.com>: > Hi Vorbis-dev, > Hi, > I've been on this list for a couple of weeks, but its been quiet, so I > dont know who is who. > > My name is Etienne Deleflie, I am the creator of www.ambisonia.com, > and I am (together with the Ambisonic community) looking for a > 'delivery format' for Ambisonic data. > >

All, Progress has been made on the proposed draft spec for integrating ambisonics into vorbis. We are not yet finished (should be soon), but you can see the progress here: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=df4dtw69_3626qqq6st The issue we have hit now concerns how/who would implement the encoding and decoding in Vorbis Tools. Because ambisonics uses spherical harmonic components, an ambisonic file

Since the opusenc and opusinfo changes were independent I split them up and landed the opusinfo changes (with updated mapping family numbers). - Mark On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 4:22 AM, Mark Harris <mark.hsj at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Drew, > > Sorry for the delay. > > FYI the patch that you attached is not your latest version. This > thread that you replied to is an older

On Sat, 28 May 2016 16:21:33 -0700, Michael Graczyk <mgraczyk at google.com> wrote : > Hi Marc, Hi Micheal. > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Marc Lavallée <marc at hacklava.net> > wrote: > > I subscribed because your discussion on the IETF draft ("Ambisonics > > in an Ogg Opus Container") was mentioned on the sursound list. > > Thanks for

Hi Opus list. I subscribed because your discussion on the IETF draft ("Ambisonics in an Ogg Opus Container") was mentioned on the sursound list. I tried Opus for ambisonics more than a year ago. It does works with uncoupled channels (I had to patch the encoder). I don't know what else could be done to optimize support for ambisonics, as I'm not a codec expert. So I think that

Where can I find the Header file or whatever which specifies the "Mapping" flag. In feb - apr 2007, there was a lot of discussion about Ambisonics and Monty kindly stated that Mapping = 1 ; Denotes and Ambisonic file as opposed to = 0 which is 1 speaker/ 1 channel Has this been written explicitly into the standard? Which standard should I be looking at?

>I have been giving some thought to how to include Ambisonics in Ogg Vorbis. As I understand it, mapping type = 1 was meant from the start to indicate an Ambisonic stream. The only other information required is the number of channels which thanks to Mr Leese's clever trick tells us exactly which Ambisonic channels are used up to 3rd order. __________________ >The channel coupling

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> >> Would it make sense to allow an arbitrary number of channels and just >> "truncate" the list of channels. For example, two-channel ambisonics >> would be W plus X and three-channel would be W, X and Y. The idea is >> that you would get

Hello, We (Google) have been experimenting with configuration and adjustments to CELT-only Opus that give good results for compressing ambisonic audio signals [1]. Based on our results so far, we would like to use Opus to encode spatial audio. We hope to make it easy/possible to use libopus with other common tools and software modules (ffmpeg/libav in particular). Based on my reading of the

I've been doing a fair amount of work with Vorbis support for Ambisonics, which seems to be going along nicely. It seems that there is signifant interest in coding 5.1 material with Vorbis esp as tarkin becomes more complete, so I've decided to take a break from pure ambisonic work to look into this. I've decided that the best (from a pure elegance and patent avoidance) way to handle

I've been doing a fair amount of work with Vorbis support for Ambisonics, which seems to be going along nicely. It seems that there is signifant interest in coding 5.1 material with Vorbis esp as tarkin becomes more complete, so I've decided to take a break from pure ambisonic work to look into this. I've decided that the best (from a pure elegance and patent avoidance) way to handle

--- On Thu, 9/17/09, e deleflie <edeleflie at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Flac Developers, > > My name is Etienne Deleflie, I'm the founder of > http://www.ambisonia.com and, more recently, http://soundofspace.com. > > Myself and the community I serve are looking for a lossless file > format that can encapsulate ambisonic encoding. To this end a > specification has

Hi Josh, The minimum things that Flac would need to implement to satisfy the 'file implementations' part of the spec is a bit of metadata and the extensions to channel counts. ok, I do realise that the extending the maximum channel count may be difficult ... there's gotta be a way to do it though. Etienne On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Josh Coalson <xflac at yahoo.com>

Hi Andrew, I suspect that the configure option should be enable-ambisonics (instead of enable_ambisonics), but for each of opus, libopusenc, opusfile and opus-tools git repos (on master branch), when I try "./configure --enable-ambisonics", I get this error message: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-ambisonics Thanks for your help. Marc Le 19-12-18 à 11 h 52, Andrew

Hello Tim and others, Thanks for your help explaining this process on IRC. I wrote out a first draft in the RFC xml format. I have attached the xml (labeled as xml.txt so it will appear inline) and the rendered txt files. Please let me know where I can make improvements. I will upload this draft to the IETF datatracker and send it out to codec@ after addressing your comments. -------------- next

Friendly ping for the opus-tools patch... ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Drew Allen <bitllama at google.com> Date: Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for Ambisonics To: opus at xiph.org <opus at xiph.org> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:52 AM Drew Allen <bitllama at google.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Sorry for the delay (got really