Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "Portaudit database truncated?"
2005 Sep 07
2
Problem with portaudit's database
Hello!
Yesterday portaudit notified me about squid's vulnerability, but today it
didn't (despite I haven't upgraded squid). This has attracted my attention,
so I've compared yesterday's and today's auditfile.tbz:
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 29875 Sep 6 15:40 auditfile.tbz
vs.
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 5685 Sep 7 10:11 auditfile.tbz
I don't see commits to
2005 Nov 06
2
What happened with portaudit?
Hello,
One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4,
ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's security
run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the
affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but
now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command lists that three
packages, so they are
2004 Sep 14
1
multiple vulnerabilities in the cvs server code
Hello!
Port security/portaudit reports the following problem:
Affected package: FreeBSD-491000
Type of problem: multiple vulnerabilities in the cvs server code.
Reference:
<http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/d2102505-f03d-11d8-81b0-000347a4fa7d.htm
l>
Note: To disable this check add the uuid to `portaudit_fixed' in
/usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf
I have 2 related questions:
1)
2004 May 03
1
Bad VuXML check on PNG port ?
Hello,
The current png-1.2.5_4 port has no more vulnerability.
It has been corrected by ache@FreeBSD.org yesterday.
But when i try to install the updated port to remplace
the vulnerable one this is what i am told :
# make install
===> png-1.2.5_4 has known vulnerabilities:
>> libpng denial-of-service.
Reference:
2004 Mar 16
3
portaudit
Any reason why portaudit and its associated infrastructure was not announced to
this list or security-notifications? I recently discovered it, and discovered
the feature was added to bsd.port.mk in the beginning of feburary. Seeing as
the security officer apparently (without announcement) no longer issues
security notices (SNs) for ports, I am assuming that portaudit has replaced
SNs entirely,
2005 Jul 30
1
ports/84312: security/portaudit doesn't report about all security bugs
Old Synopsis: portaudit doesn't report about all security bugs
New Synopsis: security/portaudit doesn't report about all security bugs
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-security
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 29 21:37:38 GMT 2005
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=84312
2004 May 16
1
Way to ignore portaudit results?
Hello,
The mysql40-client port currently reports a security
problem when I try to install it:
neely:/usr/ports/databases/mysql40-client$ make
===> mysql-client-4.0.18_1 has known vulnerabilities:
>> MySQL insecure temporary file creation (mysqlbug).
Reference:
<http://people.freebsd.org/~eik/portaudit/2e129846-8fbb-11d8-8b29-0020ed76ef5a.html>
>> Please update your ports
2006 Apr 10
1
[RFC] Ideas and Questions in security updates ( portaudit, freebsd-update)
Hi all,
I use FreeBSD for severals years and this Project now have a
possibility the full security update (src) with
freebsd-update, is really great for Release users but is break for Stable
user.
Ok !!! Exist a possibility for apply manual patch and compile issue,
but for me problem existe in fix kernel issue in stable branch because is
require a update for last stable and this
2004 Jun 13
0
FYI: new port security/portaudit-db
Dear porters and port users,
I've added a new port security/portaudit-db that complements
security/portaudit for users
that have a current ports tree and want to generate the portaudit
database themselves,
possibly distributing it over their local network. This will save you
the traffic downloading
information that is already on your local machine and avoid the lag that
is currently
2005 Aug 28
1
Arcoread7 secutiry vulnerability
Hi!
cc'd to freebsd-security@ as somebody there may correct me,
cc'd to secteam@ as maintaner of security/portaudit.
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:14:21 +0930 Ian Moore wrote:
> I've just updated my acroread port to 7.0.1 & was surprised when portaudit
> still listed it as a vulnerability.
I think it is portaudit problem.
> According to
2004 Mar 29
1
cvs commit: ports/multimedia/xine Makefile
Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 08:14:29PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
>
>>Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 03:44:06PM -0800, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
>>>
>>>>eik 2004/03/28 15:44:06 PST
>>>>
>>>>FreeBSD ports repository
>>>>
>>>>Modified files:
2013 Jul 03
1
curl and CVE-2013-2174
Dear members,
It may sound a silly question. I have curl installed:
# pkg_info |grep curl
curl-7.24.0_3 Non-interactive tool to get files from FTP, GOPHER, HTTP(S)
Today portsnap updated the ftp/curl port, and patch-CVE-2013-2174 appeared
in files/, but the port version remained such that portaudit, and
portupgrade still complain about curl's version. What is the recommended
way to
2007 Nov 12
11
Various FreeBSD bits...
I just drudged through a bit of the archives and see a FreeBSD bits
floating in there that are of some value, but aren''t on the wiki. I
posted a few bits on the wiki regarding some FreeBSD cobbling that
I''ve done recently and hope that folk find it of use (and start
posting their useful bits there as well).
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PuppetFreeBSD
The
2004 Dec 27
4
Found security expliot in port phpBB 2.0.8 FreeBSD4.10
I think, there is a neat exploit in the phpbb2.0.8 because I found my home
page defaced one dark morning. The patch for phpBB is here.
http://www.phpbb.com/downloads.php
The excerpt of the log is attached.
I believe the link to the described exploit is here.
http://secunia.com/advisories/13239
The defacement braggen page is here filter to show the exploited FreeBSD
machines that aneurysm.inc
2015 Feb 17
4
Callfile problem - Unable to find codec translation path from (nothing)
Hi,
I copied a setup from an older 1.8.5 installation to an 11.15 installation, and I'm having problems getting call files to work. Here is the extension setup I'm using:
[outbound-swift]
exten => _[a-zA-Z].,1,Answer
exten => _[a-zA-Z].,n,Playback(AAA/check_ip_failure)
;exten => _[a-zA-Z].,1,Swift("${EXTEN}")
exten => _[a-zA-Z].,n,Goto(1)
[mis-phone]
exten =>
2006 Oct 10
0
cvs commit: ports/multimedia/win32-codecs Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
Hello!
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006, Jose Alonso Cardenas Marquez wrote:
> Modified files:
> multimedia/win32-codecs Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
> Log:
> - Add the REALPLAYER and QUICKTIME(off) OPTIONS. If QUICKTIME OPTION is off,
> this port could install without problem of vulnerabilities.
> - Bump PORTREVISION
> - Other few modifications
Thanks, that's great,
2004 Apr 19
0
VuXML and FreeBSD
Hello All,
I'd like to bring to your attention the Vulnerabilities and eXposures
Markup Language (VuXML) and associated resources.
VuXML is a markup language designed for the documentation of security
issues within a single package collection. Since about February
of this year, we have been diligently documenting vulnerabilities
in FreeBSD and the FreeBSD Ports Collection using VuXML. The
2010 Sep 10
0
Custom package provider -- not stored locally?
I have a package provider which is a modified form of one of the
default ones in the FreeBSD ports version of Puppet 2.6.1r3. I placed
the provider in /usr/local/etc/puppet/modules/test/lib/puppet/
provider/ and ran puppetd on the client with the following command
line:
puppetd -o --no-daemonize -l console --pluginsync --server example.net
I got the following output:
notice:
2013 Mar 09
1
lang/ruby19: ruby-1.9.3.392,1 is vulnerable: ** [check-vulnerable] Error code 1
I try to compile port lang/ruby19 and I always get on a FreeBSD
9.1-STABLE box the following error message, which is obviously triggered
by some port auditing - but I do not find the "knob" to switch it off.
Can someone give a hint, please?
Regards,
Oliver
===> Cleaning for ruby-1.9.3.392,1
===> ruby-1.9.3.392,1 has known vulnerabilities:
ruby-1.9.3.392,1 is vulnerable:
Ruby
2006 Jul 28
2
Ruby vulnerability?
Hi,
FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So
far it doesn't appear in the VuXML, but am I correct in presuming it will
soon?
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0604.html
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3694
cheers,
-- Joel Hatton --
Infrastructure Manager | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417
AusCERT - Australia's national