similar to: monthly meeting?

Guys and Silvia, do come please. If this meeting is a fiasco, there will be a lot of stuff to discuss on some other meeting in what...? November? Not good. If you cannot come in time (like Silvia and Sebastian) we will wait a bit, but do come. If you cannot come at all, state your opinions on the issues at hand through the mailing lists. Your opinion is important.

Guys and Silvia, do come please. If this meeting is a fiasco, there will be a lot of stuff to discuss on some other meeting in what...? November? Not good. If you cannot come in time (like Silvia and Sebastian) we will wait a bit, but do come. If you cannot come at all, state your opinions on the issues at hand through the mailing lists. Your opinion is important.

Guys and Silvia, do come please. If this meeting is a fiasco, there will be a lot of stuff to discuss on some other meeting in what...? November? Not good. If you cannot come in time (like Silvia and Sebastian) we will wait a bit, but do come. If you cannot come at all, state your opinions on the issues at hand through the mailing lists. Your opinion is important.

Guys and Silvia, do come please. If this meeting is a fiasco, there will be a lot of stuff to discuss on some other meeting in what...? November? Not good. If you cannot come in time (like Silvia and Sebastian) we will wait a bit, but do come. If you cannot come at all, state your opinions on the issues at hand through the mailing lists. Your opinion is important.

Hi all, The IETF has a final draft of our RFC at ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/authors/rfc5334.txt (yes, it goes from 3534 to 5334 - funny!). If you have anything in need of change, speak up now. I have one question in particular: Ogg.k.ogg.k: is the kate codec parameter now down to 8 bytes? If so, it's ok, since I've already made that change. Cheers, Silvia.

On 14 April 2012 23:40, Ian Malone <ibmalone at gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 April 2012 23:34, Ian Malone <ibmalone at gmail.com> wrote: > >> http://pastebin.com/xXhPyZuQ > >> ./jpegtoblock.pl ?-i DSCN7376.JPG -o flacblock > >> You'll need to add the "METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE=" which makes it into a >> comment file yourself. >> >

Ralph Giles wrote: > > A URI/URL scheme for referencing streams would be a generally useful > thing. Should we override the query mechanism like the time fragment > draft? "?oggserial=0x15323421" ? > This is roughly what was suggested the last time around. A possible refinement is to provide a mapping from identifiers to IDs so you could say "?oggid=myvideo".

What I've gotten out of this discussion so far: 1) we need to introduce a means in which to do captions; this could be done through adding a "caption" element to CMML, or in another time-continuous annotation format; so far I am not sure which would be the better way 2) we need a XML annotation format for audio - in particular for music - that is more structured than vorbiscomment

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Ian Malone <ibmalone at gmail.com> wrote: > 2008/8/15 Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com>: >> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:03 PM, ogg.k.ogg.k at googlemail.com >> <ogg.k.ogg.k at googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>> Just one small question, 10.3: "In particular, .ogg is used for Ogg >>>>> files

Another spin-off discussion. The scheme used on <http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/Metadata> was to packetize XML (split it up into packets at the root level, each of which was self contained (the terminology has temporarily abandoned me), and have the bos packet as the opening <?xml &c. stanza, the eos a </xml>. It is probably more sensible to include a magic number identifying

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:03 PM, ogg.k.ogg.k at googlemail.com <ogg.k.ogg.k at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Just one small question, 10.3: "In particular, .ogg is used for Ogg >>> files that contain only a Vorbis bitstream, while .spx is used for Ogg >>> files that contain only a Speex bitstream." >>> >>> Should that be a "Vorbis

Howdy, There's quite a lot of big stuff to discuss, so I believe the July meeting should not be skipped. I'm proposing it to the next Wednesday at 0:60 am UTC 0 time, and if possible I would like that as many Xiph members as possible would attend. If you do not agree with either the time or date or both, please suggest another date/time. If it will not be possible for you to attend at

Howdy, There's quite a lot of big stuff to discuss, so I believe the July meeting should not be skipped. I'm proposing it to the next Wednesday at 0:60 am UTC 0 time, and if possible I would like that as many Xiph members as possible would attend. If you do not agree with either the time or date or both, please suggest another date/time. If it will not be possible for you to attend at

Howdy, There's quite a lot of big stuff to discuss, so I believe the July meeting should not be skipped. I'm proposing it to the next Wednesday at 0:60 am UTC 0 time, and if possible I would like that as many Xiph members as possible would attend. If you do not agree with either the time or date or both, please suggest another date/time. If it will not be possible for you to attend at

Howdy, There's quite a lot of big stuff to discuss, so I believe the July meeting should not be skipped. I'm proposing it to the next Wednesday at 0:60 am UTC 0 time, and if possible I would like that as many Xiph members as possible would attend. If you do not agree with either the time or date or both, please suggest another date/time. If it will not be possible for you to attend at

On 02/10/2007, Ian Malone <ibmalone@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin Leese wrote: > > 2. Following on from 1, a tool which inputs an > > Ogg containier with one or more streams, and > > outputs a new Ogg container with the same > > streams plus an Ogg Skeleton stream stuffed > > in front would be very helpful. The tool could > > also

On 02/10/2007, Ian Malone <ibmalone@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin Leese wrote: > > 2. Following on from 1, a tool which inputs an > > Ogg containier with one or more streams, and > > outputs a new Ogg container with the same > > streams plus an Ogg Skeleton stream stuffed > > in front would be very helpful. The tool could > > also

On 16/01/07, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/15/07, Ian Malone <ibmalone@gmail.com> wrote: > > > First, there is apparently a new version of MS DOS coming out shortly, > > does anyone know if it is any more sensible than it's predecessors? > > I've not heard of anything in that regard. Actually, I'm not sure it > would

Hello, I am new to using opus but so far I really am loving it. At 16kbps spoken content sounds fabulous. I am using opusenc on 64-bit linux - mostly with flac input. The one thing I can't figure out how to do is add album art. I tried passing the vorbis way of adding a metadata_block_picture comment field to opusenc but it complained about the length. I can't seem to find any

Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > Hi Ian, > > hmm, there was a whole bunch up on media.aidabrowser.com, but it seems > that CSIRO have taken that site offline. > > I thought there was a version of the media in cmmlwiki that produces > annodex files, but there may be a bug on the server that prevents > that. Conrad - is this a known issue? > Thanks for getting back to me.